Fairness of psychological tests: Implications of four definitions for selection utility and minority hiring.

Schmidt, Frank L.; Rauschenberger, John M.; Hunter, John E.

doi:10.1037//0021-9010.62.3.245

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Fairness of psychological tests: Implications of four definitions for selection utility and minority hiring.

Author(s): John E. Hunter , Frank L. Schmidt , John M. Rauschenberger

Publication date Created: 1977

Publication date (Print): 1977

Journal: Journal of Applied Psychology

Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Title: Journal of Applied Psychology

Abbreviated Title: Journal of Applied Psychology

Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)

ISSN (Print): 0021-9010

Publication date Created: 1977

Publication date (Print): 1977

Volume: 62

Issue: 3

Pages: 245-260

Article

DOI: 10.1037//0021-9010.62.3.245

SO-VID: 41003665-443a-4144-8c46-3e6e7e7f3b47

History

Data availability:

Fairness of psychological tests: Implications of four definitions for selection utility and minority hiring.

Read this article at

Related collections

cGMP: Generators, Effectors and Therapeutic Implications Conference

Author and article information

Journal

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 1,357

Cited by 28