8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stress beyond coping? A Rasch analysis of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) in an Aboriginal population

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The history of colonization contributed to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders becoming one of the most disadvantaged groups in Australia. The multiple social inequalities, and therefore the constant insecurities for many about low income, poor living conditions, unemployment, and discrimination, generate chronic stress in this population. In the Baby Teeth Talk Study, an oral-health randomized controlled trial, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) was administered to 367 pregnant Aboriginal women at baseline. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the PSS-14 in an Aboriginal population. The study analysed: (a) model fit; (b) dimensionality; (c) local dependence; (d) differential item functioning; (e) threshold ordering and item fit; (f) targeting; (g) reliability; and (h) criterion validity. The dimensionality analysis indicated a two-factor structure, with negatively and positively worded items clustering together and 21.7% (95% Agresti-Coull C.I. [17.8%, 26.2%]) statistically significant t-tests between the persons’ estimates. After the creation of composite items, the revised Perceived Distress (χ 2 (21) = 11.74, p = 0.946) and Perceived Coping (χ 2 (28) = 17.63, p = 0.935) subscales fitted the Rasch model. Reliability was modest (PersonSeparationIndex distress = 0.72; PersonSeparationIndex coping = 0.76). The latent correlation between the Perceived Distress and Perceived Coping subscales was r = 0.14. It is hypothesized that the social inequalities experienced by the Aboriginal population are so pronounced that even Aboriginal pregnant women that perceived themselves as coping well with life challenges ended up endorsing items regarding high levels of stress. The present research showed that a revised PSS-14 is a culturally valid and modestly reliable psychological instrument to measure stress in a population of pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Construct validity in psychological tests.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being.

              The authors examined social class differences in 2 aspects of the sense of control (mastery and perceived constraints) in 3 national probability samples of men and women ages 25-75 years (N1 = 1,014; N2 = 1,195; N3 = 3,485). Participants with lower income had lower perceived mastery and higher perceived constraints, as well as poorer health. Results of hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that for all income groups, higher perceived mastery and lower perceived constraints were related to better health, greater life satisfaction, and lower depressive symptoms. However, control beliefs played a moderating role; participants in the lowest income group with a high sense of control showed levels of health and well-being comparable with the higher income groups. The results provided some evidence that psychosocial variables such as sense of control may be useful in understanding social class differences in health.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                3 May 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 5
                : e0216333
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health (ARCPOH), Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [2 ] School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                [3 ] School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
                University of Copenhagen, DENMARK
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-8340
                Article
                PONE-D-18-25557
                10.1371/journal.pone.0216333
                6499425
                31050685
                417b4b69-87b4-4fd5-a065-9f4001f550be
                © 2019 Santiago et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 31 August 2018
                : 18 April 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 5, Pages: 24
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000925, National Health and Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: 627350
                Award Recipient :
                The Baby Teeth Talk RCT was funded by an International Collaborative Indigenous Health Research Partnership grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC, Project Grant 627350).
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Psychological Stress
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Stress
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychological Stress
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Maternal Health
                Pregnancy
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Pregnancy
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Alcohol Consumption
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Nutrition
                Diet
                Alcohol Consumption
                People and places
                Population groupings
                Ethnicities
                Indigenous Australian people
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Research Validity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Oceania
                Australia
                Engineering and Technology
                Equipment
                Measurement Equipment
                Custom metadata
                Data cannot be shared publicly because of its sensitive nature. The study participants constituted a significant proportion of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community in South Australia and the release of data could lead to the participants' identification. Data are available from the Aboriginal Research Advisory Committee of the Indigenous Oral Health Unit (Email: iohu@ 123456adelaide.edu.au . Phone: +61 8 8313 4611) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article