Blog
About

6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Analysis of exacerbation rates in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: example from the TRISTAN study.

      Pharmaceutical Statistics

      administration & dosage, analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use, Androstadienes, Asthma, drug therapy, physiopathology, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Models, Statistical, Placebos, Poisson Distribution, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Albuterol

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recurrent events in clinical trials have typically been analysed using either a multiple time-to-event method or a direct approach based on the distribution of the number of events. An area of application for these methods is exacerbation data from respiratory clinical trials. The different approaches to the analysis and the issues involved are illustrated for a large trial (n = 1465) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). For exacerbation rates, clinical interest centres on a direct comparison of rates for each treatment which favours the distribution-based analysis, rather than a time-to-event approach. Poisson regression has often been employed and has recently been recommended as the appropriate method of analysis for COPD exacerbations but the key assumptions often appear unreasonable for this analysis. By contrast use of a negative binomial model which corresponds to assuming a separate Poisson parameter for each subject offers a more appealing approach. Non-parametric methods avoid some of the assumptions required by these models, but do not provide appropriate estimates of treatment effects because of the discrete and bounded nature of the data. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          17230434
          10.1002/pst.250

          Comments

          Comment on this article