15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bias in Self-reported Voting and How it Distorts Turnout Models: Disentangling Nonresponse Bias and Overreporting Among Danish Voters

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most nonexperimental studies of voter turnout rely on survey data. However, surveys overestimate turnout because of (1) nonresponse bias and (2) overreporting. We investigate this possibility using a rich dataset of Danish voters, which includes validated turnout indicators from administrative data for both respondents and nonrespondents, as well as respondents’ self-reported voting from the Danish National Election Studies. We show that both nonresponse bias and overreporting contribute significantly to overestimations of turnout. Further, we use covariates from the administrative data available for both respondents and nonrespondents to demonstrate that both factors also significantly bias the predictors of turnout. In our case, we find that nonresponse bias and overreporting masks a gender gap of two and a half percentage points in women’s favor as well as a gap of 25 percentage points in ethnic Danes’ favor compared with Danes of immigrant heritage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Overreporting Voting

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Validation: What Big Data Reveal About Survey Misreporting and the Real Electorate

              Social scientists rely on surveys to explain political behavior. From consistent overreporting of voter turnout, it is evident that responses on survey items may be unreliable and lead scholars to incorrectly estimate the correlates of participation. Leveraging developments in technology and improvements in public records, we conduct the first-ever fifty-state vote validation. We parse overreporting due to response bias from overreporting due to inaccurate respondents. We find that nonvoters who are politically engaged and equipped with politically relevant resources consistently misreport that they voted. This finding cannot be explained by faulty registration records, which we measure with new indicators of election administration quality. Respondents are found to misreport only on survey items associated with socially desirable outcomes, which we find by validating items beyond voting, like race and party. We show that studies of representation and participation based on survey reports dramatically misestimate the differences between voters and nonvoters.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Political Analysis
                Polit. Anal.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                1047-1987
                1476-4989
                October 2019
                March 13 2019
                October 2019
                : 27
                : 4
                : 590-598
                Article
                10.1017/pan.2019.9
                41e20638-a250-480d-b40e-08c12640f79f
                © 2019

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article