59
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ubiquitous L1 Mosaicism in Hippocampal Neurons

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Somatic LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposition during neurogenesis is a potential source of genotypic variation among neurons. As a neurogenic niche, the hippocampus supports pronounced L1 activity. However, the basal parameters and biological impact of L1-driven mosaicism remain unclear. Here, we performed single-cell retrotransposon capture sequencing (RC-seq) on individual human hippocampal neurons and glia, as well as cortical neurons. An estimated 13.7 somatic L1 insertions occurred per hippocampal neuron and carried the sequence hallmarks of target-primed reverse transcription. Notably, hippocampal neuron L1 insertions were specifically enriched in transcribed neuronal stem cell enhancers and hippocampus genes, increasing their probability of functional relevance. In addition, bias against intronic L1 insertions sense oriented relative to their host gene was observed, perhaps indicating moderate selection against this configuration in vivo. These experiments demonstrate pervasive L1 mosaicism at genomic loci expressed in hippocampal neurons.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • An estimated 13.7 somatic L1 insertions occur per hippocampal neuron, on average

          • Target-primed reverse transcription drives somatic L1 retrotransposition

          • Somatic L1 insertions sense oriented to introns are depleted in neurons and glia

          • Hippocampus genes and enhancers are strikingly enriched for somatic L1 insertions

          Abstract

          Somatic genome mosaicism among neurons has the potential to impact brain function. L1 retrotransposons mobilize extensively in hippocampal neurons, preferentially in hippocampally expressed loci, and are depleted from mature neurons when oriented in the most deleterious configuration to host genes, suggesting functional significance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies.

          Next-generation sequencing technologies generate very large numbers of short reads. Even with very deep genome coverage, short read lengths cause problems in de novo assemblies. The use of paired-end libraries with a fragment size shorter than twice the read length provides an opportunity to generate much longer reads by overlapping and merging read pairs before assembling a genome. We present FLASH, a fast computational tool to extend the length of short reads by overlapping paired-end reads from fragment libraries that are sufficiently short. We tested the correctness of the tool on one million simulated read pairs, and we then applied it as a pre-processor for genome assemblies of Illumina reads from the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus and human chromosome 14. FLASH correctly extended and merged reads >99% of the time on simulated reads with an error rate of <1%. With adequately set parameters, FLASH correctly merged reads over 90% of the time even when the reads contained up to 5% errors. When FLASH was used to extend reads prior to assembly, the resulting assemblies had substantially greater N50 lengths for both contigs and scaffolds. The FLASH system is implemented in C and is freely available as open-source code at http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/software/flash. t.magoc@gmail.com.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints

            Regulatory factor binding to genomic DNA protects the underlying sequence from cleavage by DNaseI, leaving nucleotide-resolution footprints. Using genomic DNaseI footprinting across 41 diverse cell and tissue types, we detected 45 million factor occupancy events within regulatory regions, representing differential binding to 8.4 million distinct short sequence elements. Here we show that this small genomic sequence compartment, roughly twice the size of the exome, encodes an expansive repertoire of conserved recognition sequences for DNA-binding proteins that nearly doubles the size of the human cis-regulatory lexicon. We find that genetic variants affecting allelic chromatin states are concentrated in footprints, and that these elements are preferentially sheltered from DNA methylation. High-resolution DNaseI cleavage patterns mirror nucleotide-level evolutionary conservation and track the crystallographic topography of protein-DNA interfaces, indicating that transcription factor structure has been evolutionarily imprinted on the human genome sequence. We identify a stereotyped 50 base-pair footprint that precisely defines the site of transcript origination within thousands of human promoters. Finally, we describe a large collection of novel regulatory factor recognition motifs that are highly conserved in both sequence and function, and exhibit cell-selective occupancy patterns that closely parallel major regulators of development, differentiation, and pluripotency.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reverse transcription of R2Bm RNA is primed by a nick at the chromosomal target site: a mechanism for non-LTR retrotransposition.

              R2 is a non-LTR retrotransposable element that inserts at a specific site in the 28S rRNA genes of most insects. We have expressed the open reading frame of the R2 element from Bombyx mori, R2Bm, in E. coli and shown that it encodes both sequence-specific endonuclease and reverse transcriptase activities. The R2 protein makes a specific nick in one of the DNA strands at the insertion site and uses the 3' hydroxyl group exposed by this nick to prime reverse transcription of its RNA transcript. After reverse transcription, cleavage of the second DNA strand occurs. A similar mechanism of insertion may be used by other non-LTR retrotransposable elements as well as short interspersed nucleotide elements.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell Press
                0092-8674
                1097-4172
                09 April 2015
                09 April 2015
                : 161
                : 2
                : 228-239
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Mater Research Institute – University of Queensland, TRI Building, Woolloongabba QLD 4102, Australia
                [2 ]Department of Child Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK
                [4 ]Center for Genetic Medicine Research, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA
                [5 ]Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author faulknergj@ 123456gmail.com
                [6]

                Co-first author

                Article
                S0092-8674(15)00313-X
                10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.026
                4398972
                25860606
                42016d37-97a3-4005-9426-cb56a9d4b746
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 September 2014
                : 28 December 2014
                : 25 February 2015
                Categories
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article