46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Digital Health Interventions for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Literature Review

      review-article
      , PhD 1 , , MD 2 , , BA 1 , , BS 1 , , BS 3 , 4 , , BA 1 , , MD 1 , 4 , , MD 5 , , MD, MPH 3 , , MD 1 , , PhD, RN, BSN 6 , , MD 1 , , MD 7 , , MD 1 , , MD 3 , , MD, FACC, FAHA 8 , , MD, FACC, FAHA 9 , , MD, PhD, MPH 10 , 11 , , MD, MHS, FACC, FAHA, FASPC 3 ,
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer), (Reviewer), (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      Journal of Medical Internet Research
      JMIR Publications
      cardiac rehabilitation, telemedicine, digital technologies, mHealth, mobile phone

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite strong evidence supporting the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), over 80% of eligible patients do not participate in CR. Digital health technologies (ie, the delivery of care using the internet, wearable devices, and mobile apps) have the potential to address the challenges associated with traditional facility-based CR programs, but little is known about the comprehensiveness of these interventions to serve as digital approaches to CR. Overall, there is a lack of a systematic evaluation of the current literature on digital interventions for CR.

          Objective

          The objective of this systematic literature review is to provide an in-depth analysis of the potential of digital health technologies to address the challenges associated with traditional CR. Through this review, we aim to summarize the current literature on digital interventions for CR, identify the key components of CR that have been successfully addressed through digital interventions, and describe the gaps in research that need to be addressed for sustainable and scalable digital CR interventions.

          Methods

          Our strategy for identifying the primary literature pertaining to CR with digital solutions (defined as technology employed to deliver remote care beyond the use of the telephone) included a consultation with an expert in the field of digital CR and searches of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for original studies published from January 1990 to October 2018.

          Results

          Our search returned 31 eligible studies, of which 22 were randomized controlled trials. The reviewed CR interventions primarily targeted physical activity counseling (31/31, 100%), baseline assessment (30/31, 97%), and exercise training (27/31, 87%). The most commonly used modalities were smartphones or mobile devices (20/31, 65%), web-based portals (18/31, 58%), and email-SMS (11/31, 35%). Approximately one-third of the studies addressed the CR core components of nutrition counseling, psychological management, and weight management. In contrast, less than a third of the studies addressed other CR core components, including the management of lipids, diabetes, smoking cessation, and blood pressure.

          Conclusions

          Digital technologies have the potential to increase access and participation in CR by mitigating the challenges associated with traditional, facility-based CR. However, previously evaluated interventions primarily focused on physical activity counseling and exercise training. Thus, further research is required with more comprehensive CR interventions and long-term follow-up to understand the clinical impact of digital interventions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

            Although recommended in guidelines for the management of coronary heart disease (CHD), concerns have been raised about the applicability of evidence from existing meta-analyses of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation

              Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death globally. Traditionally, centre-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes are offered to individuals after cardiac events to aid recovery and prevent further cardiac illness. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes have been introduced in an attempt to widen access and participation. This is an update of a review previously published in 2009 and 2015.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J Med Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                February 2021
                8 February 2021
                : 23
                : 2
                : e18773
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD United States
                [2 ] University of Patras School of Medicine Patras Greece
                [3 ] Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD United States
                [4 ] UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine Los Angeles, CA United States
                [5 ] Medstar Franklin Square Hospital Baltimore, MD United States
                [6 ] Johns Hopkins School of Nursing Baltimore, MD United States
                [7 ] Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Baltimore, MD United States
                [8 ] Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA United States
                [9 ] Stanford Prevention Research Center Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford, CA United States
                [10 ] INTERVENT International Savannah, GA United States
                [11 ] Centre for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine School of Therapeutic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Seth S Martin smart100@ 123456jhmi.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1390-7440
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-0942
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5878-1442
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-4356
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0445-5702
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-1479
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9295-3818
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5984-2956
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4772-8213
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-8687
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8390-2277
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9150-935X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5690-0196
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-8543
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6422-1772
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-6301
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4867-8588
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9450-0326
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7021-7622
                Article
                v23i2e18773
                10.2196/18773
                7899799
                33555259
                4212954f-2bd9-4e7b-bdea-1a0b94ce3685
                ©Shannon Wongvibulsin, Evagelia E Habeos, Pauline P Huynh, Helen Xun, Rongzi Shan, Kori A Porosnicu Rodriguez, Jane Wang, Yousuf K Gandapur, Ngozi Osuji, Lochan M Shah, Erin M Spaulding, George Hung, Kellen Knowles, William E Yang, Francoise A Marvel, Eleanor Levin, David J Maron, Neil F Gordon, Seth S Martin. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 08.02.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 17 March 2020
                : 29 June 2020
                : 22 November 2020
                : 7 December 2020
                Categories
                Review
                Review

                Medicine
                cardiac rehabilitation,telemedicine,digital technologies,mhealth,mobile phone
                Medicine
                cardiac rehabilitation, telemedicine, digital technologies, mhealth, mobile phone

                Comments

                Comment on this article