4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative efficacy of vasoactive medications in patients with septic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Catecholamines, especially norepinephrine, are the most frequently used vasopressors for treating patients with septic shock. During the recent decades, terlipressin, vasopressin V1A agonist, and even Ca 2+ sensitizer were increasingly used by physicians. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of such different kinds of vasoactive medications on mortality among patients with septic shock.

          Methods

          Relevant randomized controlled trials were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials updated to February 22, 2018. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of different types of vasoactive medications. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS), and adverse events were also assessed.

          Results

          A total of 43 trials with 5767 patients assessing 17 treatment modalities were included. Treatments ranking based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve values from largest to smallest were NE/DB 85.9%, TP 75.1%, NE/EP 74.6%, PI 74.1%, EP 72.5%, VP 66.1%, NE 59.8%, PE 53.0%, DA 42.1%, DX 38.2%, SP 27.0%, PA 24.3%, EX 22.8%, LE 21.5%, and DB 13.3% for 28-day mortality. Treatments ranking for ICU mortality were TP/NE 86.4%, TP 80.3%, TP/DB/NE 65.7%, VP/NE 62.8%, NE 57.4%, VP 56.5%, PE 48.4%, DA 33.0%, PA 27.5%, LE 22.1%, and DB 9.9%. The incidence of myocardial infarction was reported with NE/EP 3.33% ( n = 1 of 30), followed by EP 3.11% ( n = 5 of 161), and then VP 3.10% ( n = 19 of 613), NE 3.03% ( n = 43 of 1417), DA 2.21% (n = 19 of 858), NE/DB 2.01% ( n = 4 of 199), LE 1.16% ( n = 3 of 258), and PA 0.39% ( n = 1 of 257). The incidence of arrhythmia was reported with DA 26.01% ( n = 258 of 992), followed by EP 22.98% ( n = 37 of 161), and then NE/DB 20.60% ( n = 41 of 199), NE/EP 20.0% ( n = 6 of 30), NE 8.33% ( n = 127 of 1525), LE 5.81% ( n = 15 of 258), PA 2.33% ( n = 6 of 257), and VP 1.67% ( n = 10 of 600).

          Conclusions

          The use of norepinephrine plus dobutamine was associated with lower 28-day mortality for septic shock, especially among patients with lower cardiac output.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2427-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions.

          The assumption of consistency, defined as agreement between direct and indirect sources of evidence, underlies the increasingly popular method of network meta-analysis. No evidence exists so far regarding the extent of inconsistency in full networks of interventions or the factors that control its statistical detection. In this paper we assess the prevalence of inconsistency from data of 40 published networks of interventions involving 303 loops of evidence. Inconsistency is evaluated in each loop by contrasting direct and indirect estimates and by employing an omnibus test of consistency for the entire network. We explore whether different effect measures for dichotomous outcomes are associated with differences in inconsistency, and evaluate whether different ways to estimate heterogeneity affect the magnitude and detection of inconsistency. Inconsistency was detected in from 2% to 9% of the tested loops, depending on the effect measure and heterogeneity estimation method. Loops that included comparisons informed by a single study were more likely to show inconsistency. About one-eighth of the networks were found to be inconsistent. The proportions of inconsistent loops do not materially change when different effect measures are used. Important heterogeneity or the overestimation of heterogeneity was associated with a small decrease in the prevalence of statistical inconsistency. The study suggests that changing the effect measure might improve statistical consistency, and that an analysis of sensitivity to the assumptions and an estimator of heterogeneity might be needed before reaching a conclusion about the absence of statistical inconsistency, particularly in networks with few studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The pathogenesis of vasodilatory shock.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The epidemiology of sepsis in Brazilian intensive care units (the Sepsis PREvalence Assessment Database, SPREAD): an observational study

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dewcheng007@163.com
                yanjing0513@126.com
                42336770@qq.com
                467843616@qq.com
                ypj_jacky@sohu.com
                jianghuaicu@sina.com
                +86 17705184082 , aztec0403@163.com
                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                14 May 2019
                14 May 2019
                2019
                : 23
                : 168
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1765 1045, GRID grid.410745.3, Department of Intensive Care Unit, , Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, ; 155 Hanzhong Road, Nanjing, 210029 China
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1765 1045, GRID grid.410745.3, Key Laboratory for Metabolic Diseases in Chinese Medicine, First Clinical Medical College, , Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, ; 138 Xianlin Avenue, Nanjing, 210013 China
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1765 1045, GRID grid.410745.3, Department of Center of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, , Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, ; 155 Hanzhong Road, Nanjing, 210029 China
                Article
                2427
                10.1186/s13054-019-2427-4
                6518735
                31088524
                4251c558-66cc-4d7b-b8b2-b4ed85337b13
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 3 October 2018
                : 9 April 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                sepsis,septic shock,vasoactive agent,hemodynamic,norepinephrine,terlipressin,dopamine,vasopressin

                Comments

                Comment on this article