130
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Large-Scale Phenomics Identifies Primary and Fine-Tuning Roles for CRKs in Responses Related to Oxidative Stress

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 3 , 5 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 6 , 3 , 2 , 7 , 3 , 6 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 3 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 6 , 3 , 6 , 9 , 4 , 5 , 2 , 5 , 1 , 3 , * , 3 , 10 , on behalf of the CRK Consortium
      PLoS Genetics
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cysteine-rich receptor-like kinases (CRKs) are transmembrane proteins characterized by the presence of two domains of unknown function 26 (DUF26) in their ectodomain. The CRKs form one of the largest groups of receptor-like protein kinases in plants, but their biological functions have so far remained largely uncharacterized. We conducted a large-scale phenotyping approach of a nearly complete crk T-DNA insertion line collection showing that CRKs control important aspects of plant development and stress adaptation in response to biotic and abiotic stimuli in a non-redundant fashion. In particular, the analysis of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related stress responses, such as regulation of the stomatal aperture, suggests that CRKs participate in ROS/redox signalling and sensing. CRKs play general and fine-tuning roles in the regulation of stomatal closure induced by microbial and abiotic cues. Despite their great number and high similarity, large-scale phenotyping identified specific functions in diverse processes for many CRKs and indicated that CRK2 and CRK5 play predominant roles in growth regulation and stress adaptation, respectively. As a whole, the CRKs contribute to specificity in ROS signalling. Individual CRKs control distinct responses in an antagonistic fashion suggesting future potential for using CRKs in genetic approaches to improve plant performance and stress tolerance.

          Author Summary

          Receptor-like kinases (RLKs) are important regulators in signal transduction in plants. However, the large number of RLKs and their high sequence similarity has hampered the analysis of RLKs. One of the largest subgroups of RLKs, the cysteine-rich receptor-like kinases (CRKs), has been suggested to be involved in mediating the effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS). While ROS are recognized as important signalling elements with a large variety of roles in plants, their ligands and achievement of signalling specificity remain unknown. Using insertion mutants we analysed the roles of CRKs in plant development and stress responses and show that CRKs have important roles as mediators of signalling specificity during regulation of stomatal aperture. Our study shows that, despite their large number and high sequence conservation, individual CRKs have intriguingly distinct functions in different aspects of plant life. This makes the CRKs promising candidates for future studies of their biochemical function.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth.

          Cell expansion is a central process in plant morphogenesis, and the elongation of roots and root hairs is essential for uptake of minerals and water from the soil. Ca2+ influx from the extracellular store is required for (and sets the rates of) cell elongation in roots. Arabidopsis thaliana rhd2 mutants are defective in Ca2+ uptake and consequently cell expansion is compromised--rhd2 mutants have short root hairs and stunted roots. To determine the regulation of Ca2+ acquisition in growing root cells we show here that RHD2 is an NADPH oxidase, a protein that transfers electrons from NADPH to an electron acceptor leading to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We show that ROS accumulate in growing wild-type (WT) root hairs but their levels are markedly decreased in rhd2 mutants. Blocking the activity of the NADPH oxidase with diphenylene iodonium (DPI) inhibits ROS formation and phenocopies Rhd2-. Treatment of rhd2 roots with ROS partly suppresses the mutant phenotype and stimulates the activity of plasma membrane hyperpolarization-activated Ca2+ channels, the predominant root Ca2+ acquisition system. This indicates that NADPH oxidases control development by making ROS that regulate plant cell expansion through the activation of Ca2+ channels.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception.

            Plants and animals recognize microbial invaders by detecting pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) such as flagellin. However, the importance of flagellin perception for disease resistance has, until now, not been demonstrated. Here we show that treatment of plants with flg22, a peptide representing the elicitor-active epitope of flagellin, induces the expression of numerous defence-related genes and triggers resistance to pathogenic bacteria in wild-type plants, but not in plants carrying mutations in the flagellin receptor gene FLS2. This induced resistance seems to be independent of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and ethylene signalling. Wild-type and fls2 mutants both display enhanced resistance when treated with crude bacterial extracts, even devoid of elicitor-active flagellin, indicating the existence of functional perception systems for PAMPs other than flagellin. Although fls2 mutant plants are as susceptible as the wild type when bacteria are infiltrated into leaves, they are more susceptible to the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 when it is sprayed on the leaf surface. Thus, flagellin perception restricts bacterial invasion, probably at an early step, and contributes to the plant's disease resistance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF genes function in ROS-dependent ABA signaling in Arabidopsis.

              Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been proposed to function as second messengers in abscisic acid (ABA) signaling in guard cells. However, the question whether ROS production is indeed required for ABA signal transduction in vivo has not yet been addressed, and the molecular mechanisms mediating ROS production during ABA signaling remain unknown. Here, we report identification of two partially redundant Arabidopsis guard cell-expressed NADPH oxidase catalytic subunit genes, AtrbohD and AtrbohF, in which gene disruption impairs ABA signaling. atrbohD/F double mutations impair ABA-induced stomatal closing, ABA promotion of ROS production, ABA-induced cytosolic Ca(2+) increases and ABA- activation of plasma membrane Ca(2+)-permeable channels in guard cells. Exogenous H(2)O(2) rescues both Ca(2+) channel activation and stomatal closing in atrbohD/F. ABA inhibition of seed germination and root elongation are impaired in atrbohD/F, suggesting more general roles for ROS and NADPH oxidases in ABA signaling. These data provide direct molecular genetic and cell biological evidence that ROS are rate-limiting second messengers in ABA signaling, and that the AtrbohD and AtrbohF NADPH oxidases function in guard cell ABA signal transduction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                21 July 2015
                July 2015
                : 11
                : 7
                : e1005373
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Department of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Plant Biotechnology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
                [3 ]Department of Biosciences, Plant Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
                [4 ]Laboratory of Biochemistry and Microspectroscopy Center, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences and Copenhagen Plant Science Center, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
                [6 ]Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
                [7 ]Department of Plant Physiology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
                [8 ]Research Unit Environmental Simulation, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
                [9 ]Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
                [10 ]Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
                University of Minnesota, United States of America
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: GB PB AG LN JS CR EM TP MB HK JWB DBC SKa MFL SR MW JK. Performed the experiments: GB PB AG LN JS CR NI KH SKi EM AV KO DK AP DTA DG JL JZ OM TP AA HL DE MB JD MFL DBC. Analyzed the data: JS GB PB AG LN CR KH SKi EM MB HK JWB DBC SKa MFL SR MW JK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DE JD HK JWB SKi DBC SR MW JK. Wrote the paper: MW JK. Critically read, contributed to and commented on the manuscript: GB PB AG LN JS CR NI KH SKi EM AV KO DK AP DTA DG JL JZ OM TP AA HL DE HK MB JD JWB DBC SKa MFL SR MW JK.

                [¤a]

                Current address: Novozymes South Asia Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, India

                [¤b]

                Current address: Institute of Plant Biology, Braunschweig University of Technology, Braunschweig, Germany

                [¤c]

                Current address: Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

                [¤d]

                Current address: Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Protein Engineering, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Warsaw, Poland

                [¤e]

                Current address: The Genome Analysis Centre & John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom

                ‡ JWB, DBC, SK, MFL, SR, MW, and JK also contributed equally to the manuscript.

                ¶ CR and NI also contributed equally to the manuscript.

                Article
                PGENETICS-D-14-02251
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1005373
                4511522
                26197346
                4285436a-7830-4998-9b1e-a2457a97145d
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 20 August 2014
                : 19 June 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 0, Pages: 36
                Funding
                This work has been performed in an ERA-PG consortium “PROSIG” ( http://www.erapg.org/). GB was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ( http://dfg.de/; ERA-PG PROSIG), DTA by an ERASMUS fellowship. Research of the SR laboratory is supported by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation ( http://www.gatsby.org.uk/) and a grant by the European Research Council ( http://erc.europa.eu/; ERC STORM). LN was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (ERA-PG research grant NWO-PROSIG, ( www.nwo.nl; 855.50.018). Ska and his group members acknowledge the support of the Welcome2008/1 program operated within the framework of the Foundation for Polish Science ( https://www.fnp.org.pl/en/), co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund ( http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/index.cfm/en/funding/erdf/), of the REGPOT project FP7-286093 WULS-PLANT HEALTH, and of the Polish National Science Centre ( https://www.ncn.gov.pl/) Maestro6 project UMO-2014/14/A/NZ1/00218. KO acknowledges the support of the Polish National Science Centre ( https://www.ncn.gov.pl/) Sonata2 project UMO-2011/03/D/NZ9/04059). DBC, MFL and CR acknowledge the Danish Research Council FTP ( http://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/rad-og-udvalg/det-frie-forskningsrad) for financial support via the projects “Unravelling plant regulatory networks” (09-062964), “Characterization of the barley CRK/DUF26 receptor-like protein kinase family in relation to drought, salt and cold stress” (11-117019) and “Climate change effects on plant health” (09-065066). HK was supported by Estonian Research Council ( http://www.etag.ee/en/estonian-research-council/; IUT2–21) and European Regional Fund ( http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/index.cfm/en/funding/erdf/; Center of Excellence in Environmental Adaptation). Research in the laboratory of JK was supported by the Academy of Finland ( http://www.aka.fi; ERA-PG research grant #129940, Centre of Excellence program 2006–2010 #213509, #129628 and 2014–2019 #271832), Biocentrum Helsinki ( http://www.helsinki.fi/biocentrum/) and the University of Helsinki ( https://university.helsinki.fi/). Research in the group of MW is supported by the University of Helsinki ( https://university.helsinki.fi/; Post-doctoral grant and three year fund allocation) and the Academy of Finland ( http://www.aka.fi; decisions #275632 and #283139). AV is supported by the Doctoral Programme in Plant Sciences ( http://www.helsinki.fi/dpps/index.htm) in the Doctoral School in Environmental, Food and Biological sciences at the University of Helsinki. AG was supported by a post-doctoral grant by the Academy of Finland ( http://www.aka.fi; #140187). NI was supported by the Finnish Graduate School in Plant Biology ( http://www.helsinki.fi/fdpps/). Phenotyping at Helmholtz Zentrum München is supported by the European and German Plant Phenotying Networks (EPPN http://www.plant-phenotyping-network.eu/ and DPPN http://www.dppn.de/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article