INTRODUCTION
In summer 2020, COVID-19 laid bare social determinants contributing to disproportional
African-American death rates,
1
and #BlackLivesMatter protests decried police brutality and systematic racism that
continue to exert daily pressure on African American lives.
2
These twin forces resulted in renewed commitment to health equity and criminal justice
reform within the medical community.
3
Microaggressions including “microinvalidation”—the denial of racialized experiences
of people of color—may more profoundly impact racial anger, frustration, and self-confidence
than overt forms of racism.
4
Furthermore, denial of racism prevents team members from realizing and confronting
their role in causing traumatic reactions or perpetuating disparities.
5
METHODS
As part of a 3-year mixed-methods evaluation of a novel team-based care (TBC) primary
care model, Primary Care 2.0,
6
we added questions on rotating topics to standard quarterly implementation-focused
interviews (standard interview guide and rotating topic questions available upon request).
Our implementation science-informed evaluation actively sought to explore the impact
of context, in this case national conversations about racial bias, since context is
a known factor in successful implementation.
Items of interest explored the potential role of racism and bias in TBC, effectively
establishing a local baseline of reported #BlackLivesMatter impact, with this prompt:
“How has #BlackLivesMatter and the national conversation about racial bias changed
the way you interact with patients or people at work, if at all?”
For this analysis we examined interview transcripts (n = 26, Table 1). A qualitative
expert (CBJ) and two physicians (MS, NKT) collaboratively coded responses for themes;
co-authors reached interpretive consensus with iterative discussions.
Table 1
Participants from Interviews Within Five Academic Primary Care Clinics—Three Community-Embedded
Clinics and Two Hospital-Adjacent Clinics—in Santa Clara County, CA (census population
estimates as of July 1, 2019: total 1,927,852; Non-Latinx White 31.0%; African American
2.8%; Native American or Alaska Native 1.2%; Asian 38.3%; Native Hawaiian and Pacific
Islander 0.5%; Latinx 25.3%; Multiple Races 4.1%)
Total
25
Role
Management
4
Clinician (MD and advance practice provider nurse practitioner or physician assistant)
11
Medical assistant
10
Gender
Female
22
Male
3
Race/ethnicity
Non-White
14
White
11
RESULTS
We identified 7 major themes around two divergent foci: lack of acknowledgement of
the role of racial bias in healthcare, and strategies to address racism (Table 2).
Nullifying themes included no impact (n = 13), denial (n = 7), and no awareness (n
= 5). Strategies revolved around communication (n = 6), patient care adaptations (n
= 3), and diversity in TBC (n = 2). Specifically, participants discussed the following:
acknowledging previous negative healthcare experiences by asking new patients “How
has healthcare been for you? Any barriers in the past?”; creating safe TBC cultures
that encourage honest communication and support team discussions about racism; becoming
aware of providers’ own assumptions and leveraging that information to intentionally
resist dismissing complaints from patients of color.
Table 2
Themes/Strategies and Exemplar Quotes from Participant Responses to the Question:
“How Has #BlackLivesMatters and the National Conversation About Racial Bias Changed
the Way You Interact with Patients or People at Work if at All?” (Excerpted from Primary
Care 2.0 Evaluation*)
Themes and responses
n*
Example quotes
No impact
13
• “No.”
• “You know, I really, it doesn’t affect me at all.”
• “Racial bias. Um, I don’t—I’m not sure if it has affected my practice”
Denial
7
• Denial of personal impact: “I treat everybody the same. We’re all human, we’re all
the same.”
• Denial of professional impact: “I’m very professional”
• Denial of ability to change system (learned helplessness): “We have these tech company
executives or engineers [who] are very equipped and health literate. You feel a little
bad because I don’t think the quality of care you provide is different [for lower
socio-economic status patients or patients of color], but I think what you can offer
the patient is different... Quality of care is not different, but the type of care
you can offer can be different... It’s a little hard to reconcile…that’s the problem
with healthcare here.”
• Denial of patient experience by actively shutting down conversations with patients:
“Try to keep the conversation on like what the main concern is. We’ll be like, ‘oh
really?’ and then I just like try to distract them and be like, ‘Oh Al, your blood
pressure was this. Oh you’re due for this.’ And then try to guide them away from that.
That way we don’t get too involved, ‘cause then if you get involved you’re talking
more about something you’re not supposed to be talking about. But try not to engage
too much, that’s what I try to do. Distract them.”
Positive communication strategies
6
• Conducting conversations with new patients about previous healthcare experiences:
“I keep that [the impact of racism on healthcare access] in the back of my mind so
asking questions like, ‘How was previous healthcare for you. Any barriers in the past?’
Just to make sure that they feel like they can come here and have the access to the
care that they need.”
• Using open-ended questions to gather whole-person patient information: “It also
reminds me to be more open-ended with my questions instead of making [assumptions]
... being aware if I’m starting to ask a question that might be leading in terms of
what they do or what they might think about something to try and step back and be
more open ended.”
• Setting expectations with patients to avoid potential triggers: “With patients especially,
even those that we've befriended and we have long relationships with, just still being
very careful with what you say… Just so it's not awkward, I always [say], ‘In this
sheet, there are a few questions that they [always] ask’…”
• Conducting staff discussions about racism: “…And it’s funny cause it’s not a conversation
I’ve had with my staff at all, but maybe it would be a good conversation to have...
Just in general about all these topics.”
• Creating a culture of psychological safety for honest communication: “I believe
that people, the team, staff, patients, and providers, have the courage and feel the
right to voice their perceptions and views of what’s going on, so I would have to
believe that there has to be some aspect of [#BlackLivesMatter] that has brought that
to the highline and has encouraged people… I know that it had a very positive affect,
so…But that was two years ago, wasn’t it?”
No awareness
5
• “I don’t even turn [the news] on. I don’t look at it. I don’t read a feed. I couldn’t
tell you about what's going on in the world today... Maybe that’s my coping mechanism.”
• “I actually don’t even watch the news at all, cause I think it’s just not even beneficial
to my life.”
Already aware and so no change in practice
4
• “I think we’re trying, and I don’t think that there’s anything different that we’re
doing.”
• “Yeah so for me personally I think I’ve always tried to practice keeping that in
mind. I know a lot personally being a person of color, just how that can affect healthcare
and access.”
Changes to patient care
3
• Assisting patients with insurance navigation: “We’ve had a lot of difficulties with
Medi-Cal, insurance-wise, and our staff is so committed to helping those patients…
We still don’t quite understand it. Medi-Cal’s rules are changing, but we have a lot
of Medi-Cal patients who have insurance questions that they’re not getting answers
for. But our staff is really committed to helping them and understanding what they
have.”
• Providers becoming aware of their own assumptions about patients: “I really try
to check my assumptions about who people are and what they do. Yeah. I’m not sure
it’s changed the conversation amongst staff members, but I’m more cognizant if I make
an assumption about someone. Do I really have any facts for that? Where did that assumption
come from?... it’s an internal reflection.”
• Resist dismissing patient complaints: “I don’t know if this is #BlackLivesMatter
necessarily or race-related necessarily, but [I try to be] less likely to dismiss
complaints. Like being aware that if this [patient] was someone of a different gender
or a different race, would I respond differently to this particular complaint?...
even providers of color [can] make those same assumptions.”
Diversity as need and asset
2
• Diversity of staff for team based care as an asset and a way to connect with patients:
“... We see the huge variety of patients…[and] because we have a pretty multicultural
staff, we are [able to connect] …speaking their language, understanding them, some
of the customs.”
• Diversity needs in recruitment for faculty, but success with recruiting diverse
staff: “We’ve tried to stay abreast about recruiting and representing minorities,
but …we need to be a lot better. I think from the standpoint of recruiting we need
to do a lot better in order to enhance our [faculty] diversity. Our staff is incredibly
diverse.”
*Complementing qualitative interviews focused on implementation science outcomes and
emergent topics such as racial bias, other evaluation activities were framed around
the Quadruple Aim, and included tracking patient outcomes and satisfaction through
HEDIS metrics and Press Ganey patient satisfaction results, assessing cost/value based
on salaries for TBC team members, and biannual wellness Professional Fulfillment Index
surveys for all staff and providers
DISCUSSION
Our interviews demonstrated a pre-2020 baseline of poor acknowledgment of the role
of racism in interactions among our care team members and with patients. It is unknown
whether these findings are unique to our time/setting, but they reflect previous research
documenting a state of widespread denial of local impacts of racism in large system
settings, which can include healthcare and academia.
4
Denial of racism may be a protective learned mechanism, but it can also perpetuate
silence and inaction.
5
Denial, overt racism, and covert microaggression/microinvalidation can threaten high-performing
healthcare teams.
4, 5
Responses to racism that promote racial justice, such as #BlackLivesMatter, may be
particularly relevant to team-based primary care, which brings together interdisciplinary
healthcare staff with diverse training and backgrounds. The American Medical Association’s
code of conduct emphasizes “[care] for the health of the community” and individual
patient-provider relationships “based on trust.” It additionally requires “patients’
welfare above the physician’s own self-interest”. Our respondents’ specific anti-racism
strategies align with this code, but may be uncomfortable for some team members. Suggested
communication approaches include active listening and checking in with colleagues
and patients about their experiences of racism; explicitly acknowledging patients’
previous potentially negative interactions with healthcare; and staying informed of
current events. Additional anti-racism strategies alluded to, but not overtly highlighted
in our data, include promoting national-level change for equitable care regardless
of race or other factors.
This study is limited by its single-institution setting; we attempted to increase
applicability by sampling multiple individual clinics and various level of staff.
#BlackLivesMatter and COVID-19 disparities dominated US media in early summer 2020,
potentially raising awareness around racism impacts in both the national collective
awareness and local clinic settings. This awareness may afford team-based care a valuable
window of opportunity to engage in individual reflection and group work around the
legacy of racism. We hope this manuscript and others provide clues for individual
and team behavior change, especially since our data demonstrate specific ways healthcare
providers and staff can interact to potentially reduce racism’s negative impact on
health and healthcare.