What do randomized controlled trials say about virtual rehabilitation in stroke? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of upper-limb and cognitive outcomes

Abstract

Background

Virtual-reality based rehabilitation (VR) shows potential as an engaging and effective way to improve upper-limb function and cognitive abilities following a stroke. However, an updated synthesis of the literature is needed to capture growth in recent research and address gaps in our understanding of factors that may optimize training parameters and treatment effects.

Methods

Published randomized controlled trials comparing VR to conventional therapy were retrieved from seven electronic databases. Treatment effects (Hedge’s g) were estimated using a random effects model, with motor and functional outcomes between different protocols compared at the Body Structure/Function, Activity, and Participation levels of the International Classification of Functioning.

Results

Thirty-three studies were identified, including 971 participants (492 VR participants). VR produced small to medium overall effects ( g = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33–0.59, p < 0.01), above and beyond conventional therapies. Small to medium effects were observed on Body Structure/Function ( g = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.28–0.55; p < 0.01) and Activity outcomes ( g = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.34–0.60, p < 0.01), while Participation outcomes failed to reach significance ( g = 0.38; 95% CI: -0.29-1.04, p = 0.27). Superior benefits for Body Structure/Function ( g = 0.56) and Activity outcomes ( g = 0.62) were observed when examining outcomes only from purpose-designed VR systems. Preliminary results ( k = 4) suggested small to medium effects for cognitive outcomes ( g = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.28–0.55; p < 0.01). Moderator analysis found no advantage for higher doses of VR, massed practice training schedules, or greater time since injury.

Conclusion

VR can effect significant gains on Body Structure/Function and Activity level outcomes, including improvements in cognitive function, for individuals who have sustained a stroke. The evidence supports the use of VR as an adjunct for stroke rehabilitation, with effectiveness evident for a variety of platforms, training parameters, and stages of recovery.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12984-018-0370-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.