13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Making sense of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in the light of evolution

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a holistic approach to combat pests (including herbivores, pathogens, and weeds) using a combination of preventive and curative actions, and only applying synthetic pesticides when there is an urgent need. Just as the recent recognition that an evolutionary perspective is useful in medicine to understand and predict interactions between hosts, diseases, and medical treatments, we argue that it is crucial to integrate an evolutionary framework in IPM to develop efficient and reliable crop protection strategies that do not lead to resistance development in herbivores, pathogens, and weeds. Such a framework would not only delay resistance evolution in pests, but also optimize each element of the management and increase the synergies between them. Here, we outline key areas within IPM that would especially benefit from a thorough evolutionary understanding. In addition, we discuss the difficulties and advantages of enhancing communication among research communities rooted in different biological disciplines and between researchers and society. Furthermore, we present suggestions that could advance implementation of evolutionary principles in IPM and thus contribute to the development of sustainable agriculture that is resilient to current and emerging pests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references97

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Pesticide Exposure, Safety Issues, and Risk Assessment Indicators

          Pesticides are widely used in agricultural production to prevent or control pests, diseases, weeds, and other plant pathogens in an effort to reduce or eliminate yield losses and maintain high product quality. Although pesticides are developed through very strict regulation processes to function with reasonable certainty and minimal impact on human health and the environment, serious concerns have been raised about health risks resulting from occupational exposure and from residues in food and drinking water. Occupational exposure to pesticides often occurs in the case of agricultural workers in open fields and greenhouses, workers in the pesticide industry, and exterminators of house pests. Exposure of the general population to pesticides occurs primarily through eating food and drinking water contaminated with pesticide residues, whereas substantial exposure can also occur in or around the home. Regarding the adverse effects on the environment (water, soil and air contamination from leaching, runoff, and spray drift, as well as the detrimental effects on wildlife, fish, plants, and other non-target organisms), many of these effects depend on the toxicity of the pesticide, the measures taken during its application, the dosage applied, the adsorption on soil colloids, the weather conditions prevailing after application, and how long the pesticide persists in the environment. Therefore, the risk assessment of the impact of pesticides either on human health or on the environment is not an easy and particularly accurate process because of differences in the periods and levels of exposure, the types of pesticides used (regarding toxicity and persistence), and the environmental characteristics of the areas where pesticides are usually applied. Also, the number of the criteria used and the method of their implementation to assess the adverse effects of pesticides on human health could affect risk assessment and would possibly affect the characterization of the already approved pesticides and the approval of the new compounds in the near future. Thus, new tools or techniques with greater reliability than those already existing are needed to predict the potential hazards of pesticides and thus contribute to reduction of the adverse effects on human health and the environment. On the other hand, the implementation of alternative cropping systems that are less dependent on pesticides, the development of new pesticides with novel modes of action and improved safety profiles, and the improvement of the already used pesticide formulations towards safer formulations (e.g., microcapsule suspensions) could reduce the adverse effects of farming and particularly the toxic effects of pesticides. In addition, the use of appropriate and well-maintained spraying equipment along with taking all precautions that are required in all stages of pesticide handling could minimize human exposure to pesticides and their potential adverse effects on the environment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Priming for enhanced defense.

              When plants recognize potential opponents, invading pathogens, wound signals, or abiotic stress, they often switch to a primed state of enhanced defense. However, defense priming can also be induced by some natural or synthetic chemicals. In the primed state, plants respond to biotic and abiotic stress with faster and stronger activation of defense, and this is often linked to immunity and abiotic stress tolerance. This review covers recent advances in disclosing molecular mechanisms of priming. These include elevated levels of pattern-recognition receptors and dormant signaling enzymes, transcription factor HsfB1 activity, and alterations in chromatin state. They also comprise the identification of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase as a receptor of the priming activator β-aminobutyric acid. The article also illustrates the inheritance of priming, exemplifies the role of recently identified priming activators azelaic and pipecolic acid, elaborates on the similarity to defense priming in mammals, and discusses the potential of defense priming in agriculture.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kristina.karlsson.green@slu.se
                Journal
                Evol Appl
                Evol Appl
                10.1111/(ISSN)1752-4571
                EVA
                Evolutionary Applications
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1752-4571
                20 August 2020
                September 2020
                : 13
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1111/eva.v13.8 )
                : 1791-1805
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Plant Protection Biology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp Sweden
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Kristina Karlsson Green, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 102, SE‐230 53 Alnarp, Sweden.

                Email: kristina.karlsson.green@ 123456slu.se

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1820-2036
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0468-799X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0850-4081
                Article
                EVA13067
                10.1111/eva.13067
                7463341
                32908586
                429018cc-890c-4f83-84fa-4060df00ddb5
                © 2020 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 November 2019
                : 04 July 2020
                : 06 July 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Pages: 15, Words: 12246
                Funding
                Funded by: FP7 People: Marie‐Curie Actions , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100011264;
                Award ID: INCA 600398
                Funded by: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100001862;
                Award ID: 2018‐01036
                Funded by: Vetenskapsrådet , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100004359;
                Award ID: 2014‐6418
                Award ID: 2018‐04354
                Categories
                Perspective
                Perspective
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.8 mode:remove_FC converted:02.09.2020

                Evolutionary Biology
                biological control,crop wild relatives,economic injury level,evolutionary application,evolutionary integrated pest management,pesticide resistance,plant resistance,plant tolerance

                Comments

                Comment on this article