7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      New, Occasional, and Frequent Use of Zolpidem or Zopiclone (Alone and in Combination) and the Risk of Injurious Road Traffic Crashes in Older Adult Drivers: A Population-Based Case–Control and Case-Crossover Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Previous studies on the effect of zolpidem or zopiclone use on the risk of road traffic crashes (RTCs) have shown mixed results.

          Objective

          Our objective was to determine the association between zolpidem or zopiclone use (as separate drugs or combined) and the occurrence of injurious RTCs among older adult drivers.

          Methods

          This was a population-based matched case–control and case–crossover study based on secondary data linked together from Swedish national registers. Cases were drivers aged 50–80 years involved in a vehicle crash resulting in injuries between January 2006 and December 2009 for the case–control study ( n = 27,096) and from February 2006 to December 2009 for the case–crossover study ( n = 26,586). For the first design, four controls were matched to each case by sex, age, and residential area, and exposure was categorized into new, occasional, and frequent use of zolpidem only, zopiclone only, and combined zolpidem and zopiclone. For the case–crossover study, newly dispensed zolpidem or zopiclone users were assessed during the 28 days prior to the crash and compared with an equally long control period using a 12-week washout period. Matched adjusted odds ratios (OR) were computed using conditional logistic regression.

          Results

          Increased ORs for all users were observed. In the case–control study, the highest odds were seen among newly initiated zolpidem-only users involved in single-vehicle crashes (adjusted OR 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–4.24), followed by frequent combined zolpidem and zopiclone users [adjusted OR 2.20; CI 1.21–4.00]. In the case–crossover, newly initiated treatment with zolpidem or zopiclone showed an increased risk that was highest in the 2 weeks after the start of the treatment (OR 2.66; 95% CI 1.04–6.81).

          Conclusions

          These results provide more compelling evidence for the role of zolpidem or zopiclone in the occurrence of RTCs among older adults, not only in frequent users, but also at the beginning of treatment.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40263-017-0445-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          National use of prescription medications for insomnia: NHANES 1999-2010.

          To determine current patterns and predictors of use of prescription medications commonly used for insomnia (MCUFI) in the U.S.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients.

            Many studies from around the world show a correlation between increasing age and adverse drug reaction (ADR) rate, at least for some medical conditions. More than 80% of ADRs causing admission or occurring in hospital are type A (dose-related) in nature, and thus predictable from the known pharmacology of the drug and therefore potentially avoidable. Frail elderly patients appear to be particularly at risk of ADRs and this group is also likely to be receiving several medicines. The toxicity of some drug combinations may sometimes be synergistic and be greater than the sum of the risks of toxicity of either agent used alone. In order to recognize and to prevent ADRs (including drug interactions), good communication is crucial, and prescribers should develop an effective therapeutic partnership with the patient and with fellow health professionals. Undergraduate and postgraduate education in evidence-based therapeutics is also vitally important. The use of computer-based decision support systems (CDSS) and electronic prescribing should be encouraged, and when problems do occur, health professionals need to be aware of their professional responsibility to report suspected adverse drug events (ADEs) and ADRs. "Rational" or "obligatory" polypharmacy is becoming a legitimate practice as increasing numbers of individuals live longer and the range of available therapeutic options for many medical conditions increases. The clear risk of ADRs in this situation should be considered in the context that dose-related failure of existing therapy to manage the condition adequately may be one of the most important reasons for admission of the elderly to hospital. Thus, age itself should not be used as a reason for withholding adequate doses of effective therapies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alicia.nevriana@ki.se
                jette.moller@ki.se
                lucie.laflamme@ki.se
                +46 8 524 833 84 , joel.monarrez-espino@ki.se
                Journal
                CNS Drugs
                CNS Drugs
                CNS Drugs
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1172-7047
                1179-1934
                1 July 2017
                1 July 2017
                2017
                : 31
                : 8
                : 711-722
                Affiliations
                ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Department of Public Health Sciences, Widerströmska huset, , Karolinska Institutet, ; Tomtebodavägen 18A, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0695-5356
                Article
                445
                10.1007/s40263-017-0445-9
                5533809
                28669021
                42b0fba3-32ba-42f7-aff6-e49b6b9fed3f
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer International Publishing AG 2017

                Comments

                Comment on this article