13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Fifth metacarpal neck fractures: is follow-up required?

      1 ,
      The Journal of hand surgery, European volume
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study examines the premise that follow-up after fifth metacarpal neck fractures is unnecessary after initial assessment in a hand clinic. Forty consecutive patients with this fracture were managed in plaster and followed up. The next 38 patients were treated with neighbour strapping, given information sheets and no follow-up visits were arranged. In the first group, most return visits were for removal of plaster. Almost half of the appointments, thereafter, were not attended. In the second group, only two patients returned to the clinic, one with minor complaints and one with a repeat injury. Patients reported better satisfaction when managed with neighbour strapping (P=0.04) and without regular follow-up visits (P<0.01). The time to return to work was a mean of 5 weeks and 2.7 weeks in the first and second groups, respectively (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the functional outcome at 12 weeks, as assessed by the DASH score.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Hand Surg Eur Vol
          The Journal of hand surgery, European volume
          Elsevier BV
          1753-1934
          0266-7681
          Feb 2007
          : 32
          : 1
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Birmingham Hand Unit, University Hospital Birmingham, Selly Oak, Birmingham, UK. smiraj@rediffmail.com
          Article
          S0266-7681(06)00438-4
          10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.09.021
          17125893
          4337856f-99dd-491d-bef5-63f09338842e
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article