33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cost Effective Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery with a Reusable Platform

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The authors found that laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with a reusable platform was feasible for various urologic entities, yielding favorable cosmetic and functional results.

          Abstract

          Background and Objectives:

          Many disposable platforms have been applied in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Besides technical issues, cost is one of the limiting factors for its widespread acceptance. The current study describes the first completely reusable LESS-platform.

          Methods:

          We performed LESS-procedures in 52 patients including nephrectomy (18), adrenalectomy (2), partial nephrectomy (3), pyeloplasty (4), renal cyst ablation (4), pelvic lymphadenectomy (15), and lymphocele ablation (6). All procedures were conducted using a novel reusable single-port device (X-Cone, Karl-Storz) with a simplified set of instruments. We obtained perioperative and demographic data, including a visual analogue pain scale (VAS), and a complication reporting system based on Clavien grading.

          Results:

          Mean age was 50.04 y. Conversion to standard laparoscopy was necessary in 3 cases and addition of a needlescopic instrument in 6 cases. There was no open conversion. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in 3 (Clavien II in 2 and III in 1) cases. Mean operative time was 110, 90, and 89 min, and hospital stay was 4.9, 3.1, and 3.6 d for nephrectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and pyeloplasty, respectively. Mean VAS was 2.13, 1.07, and 1.5 while blood loss was 81.3 mL, 25.67 mL, and 17.5 mL, respectively. Mean lymph node yield was 15 (range, 8 to 21).

          Conclusions:

          A completely reusable LESS-platform is applicable to various uses in urology, yielding favorable functional and cosmetic results. Reusable materials are useful to reduce the cost of LESS, further increasing its acceptance. LESS with a completely reusable platform is more cost effective than standard laparoscopy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report.

          To describe our initial clinical experience of robotic single-port (RSP) surgery. The da Vinci S robot (Intuitive, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was used to perform radical prostatectomy (RP), dismembered pyeloplasty, and radical nephrectomy. A robot 12-mm scope and 5-mm robotic grasper were introduced through a multichannel single port (R-port, Advanced Surgical Concepts, Dublin, Ireland). An additional 5-mm or 8-mm robotic port was introduced through the same umbilical incision (2 cm) alongside the multichannel port and used to introduce robotic instruments. Vesico-urethral anastomosis and pelvi-ureteric anastomosis were successfully performed robotically using running intracorporeal suturing. All three RSP surgeries were performed through the single incision without adding extra umbilical ports or 2-mm instruments. For RP, the operative duration was 5 h and the estimated blood loss was 250 mL. The hospital stay was 36 h and the margins of resection were negative. For pyeloplasty, the operative duration was 4.5 h, and the hospital stay was 50 h. Right radical nephrectomy for a 5.5-cm renal cell carcinoma was performed in 2.5 h and the hospital stay was 48 h. The specimen was extracted intact within an entrapment bag through the umbilical incision. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. At 1 week after surgery, all patients had minimal pain with a visual analogue score of 0/10. Technical challenges of single-port surgery that may limit its widespread acceptance can be addressed by using robotic technology. Articulation of robotic instruments may render obsolete the long-held laparoscopic principles of triangulation especially for intracorporeal suturing. We report the initial series of robotic surgery through a single transumbilical incision.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases.

            To present perioperative outcomes in an observational cohort of patients who underwent LaparoEndoscopic Single Site (LESS) surgery at a single academic center. A prospective study was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after LESS urologic surgery. Demographic data including age, body mass index, operative time, estimated blood loss, operative indications, complications, and postoperative Visual Analog Pain Scale scores were accrued. Patients were followed postoperatively for evidence of adverse events. Between September 2007 and February 2009, 100 patients underwent LESS urologic surgery. Specifically, 74 patients underwent LESS renal surgery (cryoablation, 8; partial nephrectomy, 15; metastectomy, 1; renal biopsy, 1; simple nephrectomy, 7; radical nephrectomy, 6; cyst decortication, 2; nephroureterectomy, 7; donor nephrectomy, 19; and dismembered pyeloplasty, 8) and 26 patients underwent LESS pelvic surgery (varicocelectomy, 3; radical prostatectomy, 6; radical cystectomy, 3; sacral colpopexy, 13; and ureteral reimplant, 1). Mean patient age was 54 years. Mean body mass index was 26.2 kg/m(2). Mean operative time was 199 minutes. Mean estimated blood loss was 136 mL. No intraoperative complications occurred. Six patients required conversion to standard laparoscopy. Mean length of hospitalization was 3 days. Mean Visual Analog Pain Scale score at discharge was 1.5/10. At a mean follow-up of 11 months, 9 Clavien Grade II (transfusion, 7; urinary tract infection, 1; deep vein thrombosis, 1) and 2 Clavien Grade IIIb (recto-urethral fistula, 1; angioembolization, 1) surgical complications occurred. In our experience, LESS urologic surgery is feasible, offers improved cosmesis, and may offer decreased pain. Complications are consistent with the published data. Whether LESS urologic surgery is superior in comparison with standard laparoscopy is currently speculative.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Journal
                JSLS
                JSLS
                jsls
                jsls
                JSLS
                JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
                Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons (Miami, FL )
                1086-8089
                1938-3797
                Apr-Jun 2013
                : 17
                : 2
                : 285-291
                Affiliations
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
                Author notes

                Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

                Address correspondence to: Christian Schwentner, MD, FEBU, Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Telephone: +49-7071-29-80349, Fax: +49-7071-29-5092, E-mail: christian.schwentner@ 123456med.uni-tuebingen.de
                Article
                12-05-080
                10.4293/108680813X13654754534477
                3771796
                23925023
                434fc122-ec5b-4cac-9b65-274cbf53fd2a
                © 2013 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.

                History
                Categories
                Scientific Papers

                Surgery
                less,single-port,reusable platform,cost,nephrectomy
                Surgery
                less, single-port, reusable platform, cost, nephrectomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article