6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Evolution of self-rated health status in the elderly: cross-sectional vs. longitudinal estimates.

      Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
      Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Mass Index, Comorbidity, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Geriatric Assessment, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Questionnaires, Self Concept, Smoking, Socioeconomic Factors, Spain

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We assessed the perceived health status evolution among elderly subjects and examined the age-related differences in perceived health when comparing estimates obtained from cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Data come from a cohort of non-institutionalized individuals aged 65 years or older, living in Barcelona, Spain. One thousand three hundred fifteen (1315) elderly were successfully interviewed at baseline in 1986 and 754 (84.6% of the eligible) at the re-assessment (1993-1994). Estimates of change in perceived health status were calculated based on cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. Cross-sectionally, no significant differences in the proportion of individuals with poor self-rated health were found (40.5 vs. 42.5%, P = 0.90). Among survivors, the proportion of individuals with poor health increased from 37.8% to 55.1% (P < 0.01), an 8.7-fold decline of perceived health when compared with the cross-sectional estimates. Comorbidity (aOR 2.1; 95%CI: 1.4-3.3) and no education (aOR 1.9; 95%CI: 1.1-3.2) were associated with a decline in health status after adjusting by baseline health status. We recommend the use of longitudinal studies to understand the evolution of perceived health in the elderly.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article