17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      The Affordable Care Act In The Heart Of The Opioid Crisis: Evidence From West Virginia

      1 , 2 , 3 , 4
      Health Affairs
      Health Affairs (Project Hope)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          West Virginia is the epicenter of a national opioid crisis. We examine trends in treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) among individuals enrolled in the West Virginia Medicaid expansion program under the Affordable Care Act using 2014–2016 claims data. Expanding Medicaid could provide services to populations that may previously have had limited access to OUD treatment. We thus sought to understand trends over time in OUD diagnosis and treatment, especially with medications. About 5.5% of all enrollees were diagnosed with OUD per year, and the monthly prevalence of OUD diagnoses nearly tripled during this three-year period. The ratio of individuals filling buprenorphine to the number diagnosed with OUD was around one-third in early 2014, increasing to more than 75% by late 2016. Mean annual duration of filled buprenorphine increased from 161 days in 2014 to 185 days in 2016, and most individuals filling buprenorphine also received counseling and drug testing during the study period. The growing use of medication treatment for OUD in the West Virginia Medicaid expansion provides an opportunity to reduce overdose deaths.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Confronting the stigma of opioid use disorder--and its treatment.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Premium subsidies, the mandate, and Medicaid expansion: Coverage effects of the Affordable Care Act.

            Using premium subsidies for private coverage, an individual mandate, and Medicaid expansion, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has increased insurance coverage. We provide the first comprehensive assessment of these provisions' effects, using the 2012-2015 American Community Survey and a triple-difference estimation strategy that exploits variation by income, geography, and time. Overall, our model explains 60% of the coverage gains in 2014-2015. We find that coverage was moderately responsive to price subsidies, with larger gains in state-based insurance exchanges than the federal exchange. The individual mandate's exemptions and penalties had little impact on coverage rates. The law increased Medicaid among individuals gaining eligibility under the ACA and among previously-eligible populations ("woodwork effect") even in non-expansion states, with no resulting reductions in private insurance. Overall, exchange premium subsidies produced 40% of the coverage gains explained by our ACA policy measures, and Medicaid the other 60%, of which 1/2 occurred among previously-eligible individuals.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Validation of key behaviourally based mental health diagnoses in administrative data: suicide attempt, alcohol abuse, illicit drug abuse and tobacco use

              Background Observational research frequently uses administrative codes for mental health or substance use diagnoses and for important behaviours such as suicide attempts. We sought to validate codes (International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition, clinical modification diagnostic and E-codes) entered in Veterans Health Administration administrative data for patients with depression versus a gold standard of electronic medical record text ("chart notation"). Methods Three random samples of patients were selected, each stratified by geographic region, gender, and year of cohort entry, from a VHA depression treatment cohort from April 1, 1999 to September 30, 2004. The first sample was selected from patients who died by suicide, the second from patients who remained alive on the date of death of suicide cases, and the third from patients with a new start of a commonly used antidepressant medication. Four variables were assessed using administrative codes in the year prior to the index date: suicide attempt, alcohol abuse/dependence, drug abuse/dependence and tobacco use. Results Specificity was high (≥ 90%) for all four administrative codes, regardless of the sample. Sensitivity was ≤75% and was particularly low for suicide attempt (≤ 17%). Positive predictive values for alcohol dependence/abuse and tobacco use were high, but barely better than flipping a coin for illicit drug abuse/dependence. Sensitivity differed across the three samples, but was highest in the suicide death sample. Conclusions Administrative data-based diagnoses among VHA records have high specificity, but low sensitivity. The accuracy level varies by different diagnosis and by different patient subgroup.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Affairs
                Health Affairs
                Health Affairs (Project Hope)
                0278-2715
                1544-5208
                April 2019
                April 2019
                : 38
                : 4
                : 633-642
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Brendan Saloner () is an assistant professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, in Baltimore, Maryland.
                [2 ]Rachel Landis is a graduate student in public policy at George Washington University, in Washington, D.C.
                [3 ]Bradley D. Stein is a senior physician policy researcher at the RAND Corporation in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
                [4 ]Colleen L. Barry is the Fred and Julie Soper Professor and chair of the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
                Article
                10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05049
                7066526
                30933592
                43a19a90-f418-4ea8-a3d7-269c410fca4d
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content1,490

                Cited by10

                Most referenced authors98