18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Myofilament Calcium Sensitivity: Role in Regulation of In vivo Cardiac Contraction and Relaxation

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Myofilament calcium sensitivity is an often-used indicator of cardiac muscle function, often assessed in disease states such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). While assessment of calcium sensitivity provides important insights into the mechanical force-generating capability of a muscle at steady-state, the dynamic behavior of the muscle cannot be sufficiently assessed with a force-pCa curve alone. The equilibrium dissociation constant (K d) of the force-pCa curve depends on the ratio of the apparent calcium association rate constant (k on) and apparent calcium dissociation rate constant (k off) of calcium on TnC and as a stand-alone parameter cannot provide an accurate description of the dynamic contraction and relaxation behavior without the additional quantification of k on or k off, or actually measuring dynamic twitch kinetic parameters in an intact muscle. In this review, we examine the effect of length, frequency, and beta-adrenergic stimulation on myofilament calcium sensitivity and dynamic contraction in the myocardium, the effect of membrane permeabilization/mechanical- or chemical skinning on calcium sensitivity, and the dynamic consequences of various myofilament protein mutations with potential implications in contractile and relaxation behavior.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regulation of contraction in striated muscle.

          Ca(2+) regulation of contraction in vertebrate striated muscle is exerted primarily through effects on the thin filament, which regulate strong cross-bridge binding to actin. Structural and biochemical studies suggest that the position of tropomyosin (Tm) and troponin (Tn) on the thin filament determines the interaction of myosin with the binding sites on actin. These binding sites can be characterized as blocked (unable to bind to cross bridges), closed (able to weakly bind cross bridges), or open (able to bind cross bridges so that they subsequently isomerize to become strongly bound and release ATP hydrolysis products). Flexibility of the Tm may allow variability in actin (A) affinity for myosin along the thin filament other than through a single 7 actin:1 tropomyosin:1 troponin (A(7)TmTn) regulatory unit. Tm position on the actin filament is regulated by the occupancy of NH-terminal Ca(2+) binding sites on TnC, conformational changes resulting from Ca(2+) binding, and changes in the interactions among Tn, Tm, and actin and as well as by strong S1 binding to actin. Ca(2+) binding to TnC enhances TnC-TnI interaction, weakens TnI attachment to its binding sites on 1-2 actins of the regulatory unit, increases Tm movement over the actin surface, and exposes myosin-binding sites on actin previously blocked by Tm. Adjacent Tm are coupled in their overlap regions where Tm movement is also controlled by interactions with TnT. TnT also interacts with TnC-TnI in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. All these interactions may vary with the different protein isoforms. The movement of Tm over the actin surface increases the "open" probability of myosin binding sites on actins so that some are in the open configuration available for myosin binding and cross-bridge isomerization to strong binding, force-producing states. In skeletal muscle, strong binding of cycling cross bridges promotes additional Tm movement. This movement effectively stabilizes Tm in the open position and allows cooperative activation of additional actins in that and possibly neighboring A(7)TmTn regulatory units. The structural and biochemical findings support the physiological observations of steady-state and transient mechanical behavior. Physiological studies suggest the following. 1) Ca(2+) binding to Tn/Tm exposes sites on actin to which myosin can bind. 2) Ca(2+) regulates the strong binding of M.ADP.P(i) to actin, which precedes the production of force (and/or shortening) and release of hydrolysis products. 3) The initial rate of force development depends mostly on the extent of Ca(2+) activation of the thin filament and myosin kinetic properties but depends little on the initial force level. 4) A small number of strongly attached cross bridges within an A(7)TmTn regulatory unit can activate the actins in one unit and perhaps those in neighboring units. This results in additional myosin binding and isomerization to strongly bound states and force production. 5) The rates of the product release steps per se (as indicated by the unloaded shortening velocity) early in shortening are largely independent of the extent of thin filament activation ([Ca(2+)]) beyond a given baseline level. However, with a greater extent of shortening, the rates depend on the activation level. 6) The cooperativity between neighboring regulatory units contributes to the activation by strong cross bridges of steady-state force but does not affect the rate of force development. 7) Strongly attached, cycling cross bridges can delay relaxation in skeletal muscle in a cooperative manner. 8) Strongly attached and cycling cross bridges can enhance Ca(2+) binding to cardiac TnC, but influence skeletal TnC to a lesser extent. 9) Different Tn subunit isoforms can modulate the cross-bridge detachment rate as shown by studies with mutant regulatory proteins in myotubes and in in vitro motility assays. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: distribution of disease genes, spectrum of mutations, and implications for a molecular diagnosis strategy.

            Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is an autosomal-dominant disorder in which 10 genes and numerous mutations have been reported. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic screening of these genes in a large population, to evaluate the distribution of the disease genes, and to determine the best molecular strategy in clinical practice. The entire coding sequences of 9 genes (MYH7, MYBPC3, TNNI3, TNNT2, MYL2, MYL3, TPM1, ACTC, andTNNC1) were analyzed in 197 unrelated index cases with familial or sporadic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Disease-causing mutations were identified in 124 index patients ( approximately 63%), and 97 different mutations, including 60 novel ones, were identified. The cardiac myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC3) and beta-myosin heavy chain (MYH7) genes accounted for 82% of families with identified mutations (42% and 40%, respectively). Distribution of the genes varied according to the prognosis (P=0.036). Moreover, a mutation was found in 15 of 25 index cases with "sporadic" hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (60%). Finally, 6 families had patients with more than one mutation, and phenotype analyses suggested a gene dose effect in these compound-heterozygous, double-heterozygous, or homozygous patients. These results might have implications for genetic diagnosis strategy and, subsequently, for genetic counseling. First, on the basis of this experience, the screening of already known mutations is not helpful. The analysis should start by testing MYBPC3 and MYH7 and then focus on TNNI3, TNNT2, and MYL2. Second, in particularly severe phenotypes, several mutations should be searched. Finally, sporadic cases can be successfully screened.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Regulation of cardiac contractile function by troponin I phosphorylation.

              Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a key regulatory protein in cardiac muscle contraction and relaxation, linking Ca(2+)-troponin C binding with activation of crossbridge reactions with the thin filament. In recent years, it has become increasingly apparent that myofilament properties as well as changes in intracellular Ca(2+) have a major role in the dynamic modulation of contractile function. The phosphorylation of specific serine and threonine residues on cTnI by several different kinases represents a major physiological mechanism for alteration of myofilament properties. Furthermore, altered thin filament function plays an important role in the contractile dysfunction associated with heart failure. Modification of cTnI by protein kinases A and C has been extensively studied with especially useful information deriving from (a) in vitro studies in reconstituted detergent-skinned fibre bundles in which endogenous cTnI was replaced with various targeted cTnI mutants and (b) transgenic animals in which endogenous cTnI was similarly manipulated through overexpression of cardiomyocyte-targeted cTnI mutants. cTnI may also be specifically modified by protein kinase G, p21-activated kinases and by dephosphorylation. This review focuses on recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of cTnI modification by these kinases and the consequent functional effects both under physiological conditions and in pathophysiological settings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Physiol
                Front Physiol
                Front. Physiol.
                Frontiers in Physiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-042X
                16 December 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 562
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus, OH, USA
                [2] 2Dorothy M. Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus, OH, USA
                [3] 3Medical Scientist Training Program and Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus, OH, USA
                [4] 4Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus, OH, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: P. Bryant Chase, Florida State University, USA

                Reviewed by: Beata M. Wolska, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA; David Grant Allen, University of Sydney, Australia; Rosana A. Bassani, University of Campinas, Brazil; Bertrand C. W. Tanner, Washington State University, USA

                *Correspondence: Paul M. L. Janssen janssen.10@ 123456osu.edu

                This article was submitted to Striated Muscle Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology

                Article
                10.3389/fphys.2016.00562
                5159616
                28018228
                43b86034-508b-4703-9c3b-9d4259f140e5
                Copyright © 2016 Chung, Biesiadecki, Ziolo, Davis and Janssen.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 07 September 2016
                : 07 November 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 72, Pages: 9, Words: 7876
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: R01HL113084
                Award ID: R56HL091986
                Award ID: R01HL114940
                Funded by: American Heart Association 10.13039/100000968
                Award ID: 16GRNT27760114
                Categories
                Physiology
                Review

                Anatomy & Physiology
                muscle,twitch,kinetics,desensitize,sensitize
                Anatomy & Physiology
                muscle, twitch, kinetics, desensitize, sensitize

                Comments

                Comment on this article