+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Indicadores de deseo, autoerotismo e impulsividad sexual en mujeres de la Ciudad de México Translated title: Desire, Autoerotic and Sexual Impulsivity Indicators in Women from Mexico City

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          El propósito de este trabajo fue describir indicadores de deseo sexual, impulsividad sexual y autoerotismo en 402 mujeres entre 17 y 35 años de edad residentes de la Ciudad de México. Se encontraron relaciones positivas entre los factores de autoeficacia sexual y cuatro de los seis factores de deseo sexual (atracción, excitación, romanticismo y entrega) y sólo una relación negativa entre autoeficacia y culpabilidad sexual. La impulsividad sexual correlacionó positivamente con culpabilidad sexual. El deseo de autoerotismo se vinculó negativamente con los factores de autoeficacia y culpabilidad sexual. Tanto en los grupos divididos por edad como en los grupos divididos por haber o no iniciado una vida sexual activa; se encontraron algunas diferencias significativas siendo las mujeres con más edad y las que habían ya iniciado su vida sexual, las que obtuvieron las medias más altas en los factores de deseo sexual (entrega y excitación).

          Translated abstract

          The purpose of this study was to describe indicators of sexual desire, sexual impulsivity and auto-eroticism in 402 women aged between 17 and 35 years living in Mexico City. Positive relationships were found between the factors sexual self-efficacy and four of the six factors of sexual desire ('attraction', 'excitement', 'romance' and 'sexual surrender') and only one negative relationship between 'self-efficacy' and 'sexual guilt'. 'Sexual impulsivity' correlated positively with sexual guilt. 'Autoerotic desire' correlated negatively with the factors 'self-efficacy' and 'sexual guilt'. Some significant differences were found between age groups and between those classified as being or not sexually active. The group of elder women and of those who had already started their sexual life obtained the highest averages in the factors 'sexual surrender' and 'excitement'.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Gender differences in erotic plasticity: the female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive.

          Responding to controversies about the balance between nature and culture in determining human sexuality, the author proposes that the female sex drive is more malleable than the male in response to sociocultural and situational factors. A large assortment of evidence supports 3 predictions based on the hypothesis of female erotic plasticity: (a) Individual women will exhibit more variation across time than men in sexual behavior, (b) female sexuality will exhibit larger effects than male in response to most specific sociocultural variables, and (c) sexual attitude-behavior consistency will be lower for women than men. Several possible explanations for female erotic plasticity are reviewed, including adaptation to superior male political and physical power, the centrality of female change (from no to yes) as a prerequisite for intercourse, and the idea that women have a milder sex drive than men.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Is There a Gender Difference in Strength of Sex Drive? Theoretical Views, Conceptual Distinctions, and a Review of Relevant Evidence

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of masturbation and associated factors in a British national probability survey.

              A stratified probability sample survey of the British general population, aged 16 to 44 years, was conducted from 1999 to 2001 (N = 11,161) using face-to-face interviewing and computer-assisted self-interviewing. We used these data to estimate the population prevalence of masturbation, and to identify sociodemographic, sexual behavioral, and attitudinal factors associated with reporting this behavior. Seventy-three percent of men and 36.8% of women reported masturbating in the 4 weeks prior to interview (95% confidence interval 71.5%-74.4% and 35.4%-38.2%, respectively). A number of sociodemographic and behavioral factors were associated with reporting masturbation. Among both men and women, reporting masturbation increased with higher levels of education and social class and was more common among those reporting sexual function problems. For women, masturbation was more likely among those who reported more frequent vaginal sex in the last four weeks, a greater repertoire of sexual activity (such as reporting oral and anal sex), and more sexual partners in the last year. In contrast, the prevalence of masturbation was lower among men reporting more frequent vaginal sex. Both men and women reporting same-sex partner(s) were significantly more likely to report masturbation. Masturbation is a common sexual practice with significant variations in reporting between men and women.

                Author and article information

                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Acta de investigación psicológica
                Acta de investigación psicol
                Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Psicología (México )
                April 2013
                : 3
                : 1
                : 1031-1040
                [1 ] Universidad Iberoamericana Mexico
                [2 ] Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo Mexico


                Product Information: SciELO Mexico
                Nuclear Science & Technology
                Psychology, Applied
                Psychology, Developmental
                Psychology, Educational
                Psychology, Experimental


                Comment on this article