3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effect of the type of anesthesia on the quality of postoperative recovery after orthopedic forearm surgery

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although the quality of postoperative recovery may be affected by factors, there are few investigations whether the type of anesthesia also affects it. In this single-blinded, prospective, observational study, we compared the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing orthopedic forearm surgery under general or regional anesthesia (brachial plexus block).

          Methods

          Ninety-seven subjects, aged 18–65 years and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, undergoing orthopedic forearm surgery, were allocated to general or regional anesthesia group. The quality of postoperative recovery was assessed using a validated Korean version of Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40K) questionnaire. Patients were surveyed three times, the day before surgery (baseline) and 1st and 7th day after the surgery, and the scores of both groups were compared.

          Results

          We analyzed 47 and 50 patients in general and regional anesthesia, respectively. The global QoR-40K score and those of each of its five dimensions were not significantly different between the two groups at baseline, 1st and 7th day postoperatively. In two-way RM ANOVA, the global QoR-40K score at postoperative 1st day was significantly lower than that of baseline (P < 0.001) and postoperative 7th day (P < 0.001), respectively, in both general and regional anesthesia groups. However, there was no significant difference at each timepoint between the two groups.

          Conclusions

          The present study suggests that brachial plexus block with intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion does not improve the quality of postoperative recovery compared to sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia with remifentanil infusion in patients undergoing orthopedic forearm surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales.

          Several quality of recovery (QoR) health status scales have been developed to quantify the patient's experience after anesthesia and surgery, but to date, it is unclear what constitutes the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). That is, what minimal change in score would indicate a meaningful change in a patient's health status?
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.

            Quality of recovery after anaesthesia is an important measure of the early postoperative health status of patients. We attempted to develop a valid, reliable and responsive measure of quality of recovery after anaesthesia and surgery. We studied 160 patients and asked them to rate postoperative recovery using three methods: a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), a nine-item questionnaire and a 50-item questionnaire; the questionnaires were repeated later on the same day. From these results, we developed a 40-item questionnaire as a measure of quality of recovery (QoR-40; maximum score 200). We found good convergent validity between QoR-40 and VAS (r = 0.68, P < 0.001). Construct validity was supported by a negative correlation with duration of hospital stay (rho = -0.24, P < 0.001) and a lower mean QoR-40 score in women (162 (SD 26)) compared with men (173 (17)) (P = 0.002). There was also good test-retest reliability (intra-class ri = 0.92, P < 0.001), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93, P < 0.001) and split-half coefficient (alpha = 0.83, P < 0.001). The standardized response mean, a measure of responsiveness, was 0.65. The QoR-40 was completed in less than 6.3 (4.9) min. We believe that the QoR-40 is a good objective measure of quality of recovery after anaesthesia and surgery. It would be a useful end-point in perioperative clinical studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on emergence agitation and quality of recovery after nasal surgery.

              Emergence agitation is common after nasal surgery. We investigated the effects of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion on emergence agitation and quality of recovery after nasal surgery in adult patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Anesthesiol
                Korean J Anesthesiol
                KJA
                Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
                Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
                2005-6419
                2005-7563
                February 2020
                9 October 2019
                : 73
                : 1
                : 58-66
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
                [2 ]Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Dong-Chan Kim, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, 20, Gunji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju 54907, Korea Tel: +82-63-250-1241 Fax: +82-63-250-1240 Email: dckim@ 123456jbnu.ac.kr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-790X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8211-3831
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8771-488X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3910-454X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9619-2008
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-1129
                Article
                kja-19352
                10.4097/kja.19352
                7000287
                31597228
                44401647-d3e2-42cb-947d-16fe0738112f
                Copyright © The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2020

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 20 August 2019
                : 6 October 2019
                : 8 October 2019
                Categories
                Clinical Research Article

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                general anesthesia,general surgery,orthopedic surgery,postoperative recovery,quality,regional anesthesia

                Comments

                Comment on this article