10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Biomechanical Comparison of INTERTAN Nail and Gamma3 Nail for Intertrochanteric Fractures

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To compare the biomechanical stabilities of Gamma3 nail and INTERTAN nail (ITN) for stable (AO/OTA 31A1.1) and unstable (AO/OTA 31A2.2) femoral intertrochanteric fracture.

          Methods

          Twenty‐four synthetic femora were randomly divided into four groups. After internal fixation (Gamma3 nail or ITN) had been implanted, stable and unstable intertrochanteric fracture models were produced. A cyclic testing protocol with increasing loads was performed for both stable and unstable intertrochanteric fracture models, and then torsional test and axial compression failure test were conducted. Stiffness, failure load, torque, and fragment displacement were recorded.

          Results

          For stable fracture model: fragment displacement in ITN group were smaller than Gamma3 nail group (Gamma3 nail: 1.66 ± 0.13 mm; ITN: 1.55 ± 0.1 mm); stiffness (Gamma3 nail: 1142.6 ± 161.1 N/mm, ITN: 1159.3 ± 203.5 N/mm, P = 0.872) and failure load (Gamma3 nail: 5715.42 ± 616.34 N, ITN: 5690.27 ± 625.59 N, P = 0. 951) of the two nails were similar after cyclic test; torque of the ITN group was larger than the Gamma3 nail group. For unstable fracture model: fragment displacement in ITN group was significantly smaller than in the Gamma3 nail group when the axial load was larger than 800 N (Gamma3 nail: 3.59 ± 0.19 mm; ITN: 2.93 ± 0.28 mm); ITN group showed a significantly higher failure load than Gamma3 nail group (Gamma3 nail: 2942.77 ± 573.4 N, ITN: 3672.3 ± 790.5 N, P = 0. 011); torque was significantly higher for the ITN group compared to the Gamma3 nail group for three different angles.

          Conclusions

          Both ITN and Gamma3 nail can maintain sufficient biomechanical stability for stable intertrochanteric fractures, but ITN was a better choice for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

          Abstract

          The biomechanical properties of the Gamma3 nail and the ITN were similar for stable fracture model. The ITN reduced torsional movement of the femoral head and relative movement between fracture fragments in unstable fracture model. Both ITN and Gamma3 nail can be used for stable intertrochanteric fractures. However, ITN was a better choice for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.

          A new method of fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures that involves the use of an intramedullary nail that interlocks proximally into the femoral head was introduced in the early 1990s. Anecdotal observation of practice patterns during the Part II (oral) American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery examination suggested that the use of this method had increased substantially in recent years in comparison with the more traditional sliding compression screw technique. A study of the Part II database was undertaken to detect changing patterns of care for intertrochanteric fractures. During the process of Board certification, candidates for the Part II (oral) examination submit a six-month surgical case list and patient data into a secure database. The database was searched for all intertrochanteric fractures (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code 820.20 or 820.21) over a seven-year period (1999 through 2006). The cases were categorized by intramedullary nail or plate fixation on the basis of surgeon-reported Current Procedural Terminology codes. Relative utilization of the two devices was analyzed according to year and region, and the devices were compared in terms of complications and outcomes. A dramatic change in practice was demonstrated, with the intramedullary nail fixation rate increasing from 3% in 1999 to 67% in 2006. Regional variation was substantial. The highest rate of utilization of intramedullary nail fixation was recorded by candidates from the South, Southeast, and Southwest, who converted to the new technology faster than those in the Northeast, Northwest, and Midwest. Overall, patients managed with plate fixation had slightly less pain and deformity in comparison with those managed with intramedullary nailing, with no significant differences being identified in terms of function or satisfaction. Patients managed with intramedullary nailing had more procedure-related complications, particularly bone fracture. From 1999 to 2006, a dramatic change in surgeon preference for the fixation device used for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures has occurred among young orthopaedic surgeons. This change has occurred despite a lack of evidence in the literature supporting the change and in the face of the potential for more complications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Epidemiology of hip fractures

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail.

              To compare the results between a new intramedullary Gamma nail and a compression hip screw in the treatment of trochanteric fractures. Prospective randomized. Level 1 trauma center. Two hundred ten consecutive patients older than 65 years with trochanteric femoral fractures. Treatment with a compression hip screw or a new design of the Trochanteric Gamma nail (180 mm in length with a mediolateral angle of 4 degrees and available only with a proximal diameter of 17 mm and distal diameter of 11 mm). Operative and fluoroscopy times, blood loss, functional outcome, complication rate, and failure of fixation. The Trochanteric Gamma nail was used in 104 patients and the compression hip screw in 106. The 2 groups were similar in terms of their preoperative data, with a median follow-up of 13.6 months (range 12-30). The results show no difference in operating time (P = 0.21), but the Trochanteric Gamma nail group had a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (P = 0.006), and the number of patients transfused and the mean of units of blood transfused were significantly less in the Trochanteric Gamma nail group (P = 0.013, 0.046, respectively). Mortality within 12 months was similar in both groups (P = 0.83). All fractures were radiographically healed at the last visit. There was no difference in intraoperative and postoperative complications or rate of fixation failure between the 2 groups, and no case of secondary shaft fracture of the femur was encountered in this study. In the entire series, there was no difference in the functional outcome (P = 0.74), but the postoperative walking ability was better in those patients with unstable fractures who were treated with the Trochanteric Gamma nail (P = 0.017). The new Trochanteric Gamma nail is an effective method for the treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients. The indication for either Trochanteric Gamma nail or compression hip screw is similar in stable fractures, but we recommend the use of the Trochanteric Gamma nail for unstable trochanteric fractures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tjmxl2017@sina.com
                Journal
                Orthop Surg
                Orthop Surg
                10.1111/(ISSN)1757-7861
                OS
                Orthopaedic Surgery
                John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd (Melbourne )
                1757-7853
                1757-7861
                20 November 2020
                December 2020
                : 12
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/os.v12.6 )
                : 1990-1997
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Orthopeadics Clinical College Tianjin Medical University Tianjin China
                [ 2 ] Department of Arthroscopy Tianjin Hospital Tianjin China
                [ 3 ] Department of Orthopeadics Tianjin Hospital Tianjin China
                [ 4 ] Orthopeadics Institute Tianjin Hospital Tianjin China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Address for correspondence Xin‐long Ma, Orthopeadics Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, No. 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China 300070; Department of Orthopeadics, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406 Jiefangnan Road, Tianjin, China 300211 Tel: 086‐13752546693; Fax: 086‐022 28332917; E‐mail: tjmxl2017@ 123456sina.com
                [†]

                Wei Luo and Xin Fu contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6540-6816
                Article
                OS12853
                10.1111/os.12853
                7767685
                33215879
                44824f4d-5a0d-4e86-b977-38f8f36419fe
                © 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 15 August 2020
                : 02 October 2020
                : 02 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 8, Words: 4405
                Categories
                Scientific Article
                Scientific Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.6 mode:remove_FC converted:27.12.2020

                biomechanical testing,gamma3 nail,intertan nail,intertrochanteric fractures

                Comments

                Comment on this article