Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

A comparison of methods to compute the potential of mean force.

Chemphyschem

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Most processes occurring in a system are determined by the relative free energy between two or more states because the free energy is a measure of the probability of finding the system in a given state. When the two states of interest are connected by a pathway, usually called reaction coordinate, along which the free-energy profile is determined, this profile or potential of mean force (PMF) will also yield the relative free energy of the two states. Twelve different methods to compute a PMF are reviewed and compared, with regard to their precision, for a system consisting of a pair of methane molecules in aqueous solution. We analyze all combinations of the type of sampling (unbiased, umbrella-biased or constraint-biased), how to compute free energies (from density of states or force averaging) and the type of coordinate system (internal or Cartesian) used for the PMF degree of freedom. The method of choice is constraint-bias simulation combined with force averaging for either an internal or a Cartesian PMF degree of freedom.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      10.1002/cphc.200600527
      17131434

      Comments

      Comment on this article