155
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pilot studies for phase III trials - which are comparative randomized trials designed to provide preliminary evidence on the clinical efficacy of a drug or intervention - are routinely performed in many clinical areas. Also commonly know as "feasibility" or "vanguard" studies, they are designed to assess the safety of treatment or interventions; to assess recruitment potential; to assess the feasibility of international collaboration or coordination for multicentre trials; to increase clinical experience with the study medication or intervention for the phase III trials. They are the best way to assess feasibility of a large, expensive full-scale study, and in fact are an almost essential pre-requisite. Conducting a pilot prior to the main study can enhance the likelihood of success of the main study and potentially help to avoid doomed main studies. The objective of this paper is to provide a detailed examination of the key aspects of pilot studies for phase III trials including: 1) the general reasons for conducting a pilot study; 2) the relationships between pilot studies, proof-of-concept studies, and adaptive designs; 3) the challenges of and misconceptions about pilot studies; 4) the criteria for evaluating the success of a pilot study; 5) frequently asked questions about pilot studies; 7) some ethical aspects related to pilot studies; and 8) some suggestions on how to report the results of pilot investigations using the CONSORT format.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trials.

              Investigators often design clinical trials without knowing precisely the values of such necessary parameters as the variances or the event rates in the control group. In order to determine reasonable values for such parameters, they may design a small pilot study external to the main trial. In this paper we propose designs, which we term internal pilot studies, that designate a portion of the main trial as a pilot phase. At the end of the internal pilot study, the investigators recompute preselected parameters and recalculate required sample size. The study then proceeds with the modifications dictated by the internal pilot. Final analyses of the results incorporate all data, disregarding the fact that part of the data came from a pilot phase. As one example of this type of design, we consider a study to compare two normally distributed means. By simulation, we show a numerical example for which the effect of the procedure on the alpha-level is negligible, but the potential gain in power considerable. We urge considering a similar approach for a number of types of endpoints.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Medical Research Methodology
                BioMed Central
                1471-2288
                2010
                6 January 2010
                : 10
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada
                [2 ]Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton ON, Canada
                [3 ]Department of Medical Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline Inc., Mississauga ON, Canada
                [4 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada
                [5 ]Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo ON, Canada
                Article
                1471-2288-10-1
                10.1186/1471-2288-10-1
                2824145
                20053272
                44b25296-9010-4532-98c8-28952433a789
                Copyright ©2010 Thabane et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 9 August 2009
                : 6 January 2010
                Categories
                Commentary

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content287

                Cited by959

                Most referenced authors274