63
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Differential Performance of a Specialist and Two Generalist Herbivores and Their Parasitoids on Plantago lanceolata

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The ability to cope with plant defense chemicals differs between specialist and generalist species. In this study, we examined the effects of the concentration of the two main iridoid glycosides (IGs) in Plantago lanceolata, aucubin and catalpol, on the performance of a specialist and two generalist herbivores and their respective endoparasitoids. Development of the specialist herbivore Melitaea cinxia was unaffected by the total leaf IG concentration in its host plant. By contrast, the generalist herbivores Spodoptera exigua and Chrysodeixis chalcites showed delayed larval and pupal development on plant genotypes with high leaf IG concentrations, respectively. This result is in line with the idea that specialist herbivores are better adapted to allelochemicals in host plants on which they are specialized. Melitaea cinxia experienced less post-diapause larval and pupal mortality on its local Finnish P. lanceolata than on Dutch genotypes. This could not be explained by differences in IG profiles, suggesting that M. cinxia has adapted in response to attributes of its local host plants other than to IG chemistry. Development of the specialist parasitoid Cotesia melitaearum was unaffected by IG variation in the diet of its host M. cinxia, a response that was concordant with that of its host. By contrast, the development time responses of the generalist parasitoids Hyposoter didymator and Cotesia marginiventris differed from those of their generalist hosts, S. exigua and C. chalcites. While their hosts developed slowly on high-IG genotypes, development time of H. didymator was unaffected. Cotesia marginiventris actually developed faster on hosts fed high-IG genotypes, although they then had short adult longevity. The faster development of C. marginiventris on hosts that ate high-IG genotypes is in line with the “immunocompromized host” hypothesis, emphasizing the potential negative effects of toxic allelochemicals on the host’s immune response.

          Related collections

          Most cited references75

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Butterflies and Plants: A Study in Coevolution

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

            The extent to which an organism is selected to invest in defences against pathogens and parasites depends on the advantages that ensue should infection occur, but also on the costs of maintaining defences in the absence of infection. The presence of heritable variation in resistance suggests that costs exist, but we know very little about the nature or magnitude of these costs in natural populations of animals. A powerful technique for identifying trade-offs between fitness components is the study of correlated responses to artificial selection. We have selected Drosophila melanogaster for improved resistance against an endoparasitoid, Asobara tabida. Endoparasitoids are insects whose larvae develop internally within the body of other insects, eventually killing them, although their hosts can sometimes survive attack by mounting a cellular immune response. We found that reduced larval competitive ability in unparasitized D. melanogaster is a correlated response to artificial selection for improved resistance against A. tabida. The strength of selection for competitive ability and parasitoid resistance is likely to vary temporally and spatially, which may explain the observed heritable variation in resistance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sequestration of defensive substances from plants by Lepidoptera.

              A number of aposematic butterfly and diurnal moth species sequester unpalatable or toxic substances from their host plants rather than manufacturing their own defensive substances. Despite a great diversity in their life histories, there are some general features in the selective utilization of plant secondary metabolites to achieve effective protection from predators. This review illustrates the biochemical, physiological, and ecological characteristics of phytochemical-based defense systems that can shed light on the evolution of the widely developed sequestering lifestyles among the Lepidoptera.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                talsma.reudler@jyu.fi
                Journal
                J Chem Ecol
                Journal of Chemical Ecology
                Springer-Verlag (New York )
                0098-0331
                1573-1561
                21 June 2011
                21 June 2011
                July 2011
                : 37
                : 7
                : 765-778
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, NIOO-KNAW, P.O. Box 50, NL-6700 AB Wageningen, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Centre of Excellence in Evolutionary Research, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
                [3 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Corson Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
                [4 ]Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
                Article
                9983
                10.1007/s10886-011-9983-7
                3125503
                21691810
                45486449-5e61-4304-b35d-548e776c38f3
                © The Author(s) 2011
                History
                : 28 February 2011
                : 3 June 2011
                : 8 June 2011
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

                Ecology
                spodoptera exigua,cotesia marginiventris,melitaea cinxia,chrysodeixis chalcites,immunocompromised host,hyposoter didymator,chemical defense,cotesia melitaearum,iridoid glycosides,multitrophic interactions

                Comments

                Comment on this article