103
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Encoding of Naturalistic Stimuli by Local Field Potential Spectra in Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recordings of local field potentials (LFPs) reveal that the sensory cortex displays rhythmic activity and fluctuations over a wide range of frequencies and amplitudes. Yet, the role of this kind of activity in encoding sensory information remains largely unknown. To understand the rules of translation between the structure of sensory stimuli and the fluctuations of cortical responses, we simulated a sparsely connected network of excitatory and inhibitory neurons modeling a local cortical population, and we determined how the LFPs generated by the network encode information about input stimuli. We first considered simple static and periodic stimuli and then naturalistic input stimuli based on electrophysiological recordings from the thalamus of anesthetized monkeys watching natural movie scenes. We found that the simulated network produced stimulus-related LFP changes that were in striking agreement with the LFPs obtained from the primary visual cortex. Moreover, our results demonstrate that the network encoded static input spike rates into gamma-range oscillations generated by inhibitory–excitatory neural interactions and encoded slow dynamic features of the input into slow LFP fluctuations mediated by stimulus–neural interactions. The model cortical network processed dynamic stimuli with naturalistic temporal structure by using low and high response frequencies as independent communication channels, again in agreement with recent reports from visual cortex responses to naturalistic movies. One potential function of this frequency decomposition into independent information channels operated by the cortical network may be that of enhancing the capacity of the cortical column to encode our complex sensory environment.

          Author Summary

          The brain displays rhythmic activity in almost all areas and over a wide range of frequencies and amplitudes. However, the role of these rhythms in the processing of sensory information is still unclear. To study the interplay between visual stimuli and ongoing oscillations in the brain, we developed a model of a local circuit of the visual cortex. We injected into the network the signal recorded in the thalamus of an anesthetized monkey watching a movie, to mimic the effect of a naturalistic stimulus arriving at the visual cortex. Our results are in striking agreement with recordings from the visual cortex. Furthermore, through manipulations of the signal and information analysis, we found that two specific frequency bands of the neurons' activity are used to encode independent stimuli features. These results describe how sensory stimuli can modulate frequency and amplitude of ongoing neural activity and how these modulations can be used to convey sensory information through the different layers of the brain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks.

          Gamma frequency oscillations are thought to provide a temporal structure for information processing in the brain. They contribute to cognitive functions, such as memory formation and sensory processing, and are disturbed in some psychiatric disorders. Fast-spiking, parvalbumin-expressing, soma-inhibiting interneurons have a key role in the generation of these oscillations. Experimental analysis in the hippocampus and the neocortex reveals that synapses among these interneurons are highly specialized. Computational analysis further suggests that synaptic specialization turns interneuron networks into robust gamma frequency oscillators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neural correlations, population coding and computation.

            How the brain encodes information in population activity, and how it combines and manipulates that activity as it carries out computations, are questions that lie at the heart of systems neuroscience. During the past decade, with the advent of multi-electrode recording and improved theoretical models, these questions have begun to yield answers. However, a complete understanding of neuronal variability, and, in particular, how it affects population codes, is missing. This is because variability in the brain is typically correlated, and although the exact effects of these correlations are not known, it is known that they can be large. Here, we review studies that address the interaction between neuronal noise and population codes, and discuss their implications for population coding in general.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Rhythms of the Brain

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Comput Biol
                plos
                ploscomp
                PLoS Computational Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1553-734X
                1553-7358
                December 2008
                December 2008
                12 December 2008
                : 4
                : 12
                : e1000239
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Statistical Physics, Institute for Scientific Interchange, Turin, Italy
                [2 ]Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Italian Institute of Technology, Genoa, Italy
                [3 ]Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
                [5 ]Division of Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Laboratory of Neurophysics and Physiology, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
                [7 ]CNRS UMR 8119, Paris, France
                University College London, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: NKL. Performed the experiments: NKL. Analyzed the data: AM SP. Wrote the paper: AM SP NB. Conceived and designed the simulations: AM SP NB. Performed the simulations: AM NB. Read and commented on the paper: AM SP NKL NB. Defined the general questions: SP NKL NB.

                Article
                08-PLCB-RA-0569R2
                10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000239
                2585056
                19079571
                456f8200-f663-4ece-a9f0-46fbb12975c3
                Mazzoni et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 5 August 2008
                : 28 October 2008
                Page count
                Pages: 20
                Categories
                Research Article
                Computational Biology/Computational Neuroscience
                Neuroscience/Sensory Systems
                Neuroscience/Theoretical Neuroscience

                Quantitative & Systems biology
                Quantitative & Systems biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article