1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women undergoing balloon mitral valvotomy for rheumatic mitral stenosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Rheumatic mitral stenosis constitutes a major cause of acquired heart disease complicating pregnancy in India. In the present study, we have studied the fetal and maternal outcomes of women undergoing balloon mitral valvotomy during pregnancy.

          Methods and results

          49 pregnant ladies were included in this study in whom balloon mitral valvotomy was performed. The mean age of these patients was 25.7 ± 3.1 years. The mean gestational age was 23.5 ± 5.2 weeks (12–36 weeks). The procedure was successful in 48 patients (95.9%). Mean two-dimensional MVA increased from baseline value of 0.93 ± 0.17 cm 2 to 1.75 ± 0.27 cm 2 ( p value <0.0001). Pre-procedure peak pulmonary artery pressure was 43.05 ± 15.88 mmHg, which decreased to 22.31 ± 6.36 mmHg ( p value <0.0001). Hemodynamic data showed pre-BMV left atrial mean pressure of 29.6 ± 6.6 mmHg, which decreased to 13.7 ± 4.8 mmHg after the procedure ( p value <0.0001). Mean fluoroscopy time was 6.4 ± 1.2 min. There was no maternal mortality in our study. One procedure had to be abandoned, because of failed septal puncture. One of the patients developed cardiac tamponade and another patient developed severe mitral regurgitation, which were managed medically. The patient who developed severe mitral regurgitation later underwent mitral valve replacement. Post-procedure follow-up showed an improvement in NYHA status by at least one class in 81.3% of patients. Thirty-nine (81.3%) patients had a term normal vaginal delivery and 8 (16.7%) underwent cesarean section for obstetric indications. One of the patients had abortion on the second day of the procedure.

          Conclusion

          Percutaneous mitral valvotomy during pregnancy is safe and provides excellent symptomatic relief and hemodynamic improvement. This should be considered as the treatment of choice when managing pregnant women with severe mitral stenosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The effect of valvular heart disease on maternal and fetal outcome of pregnancy.

          The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between valvular heart disease (VHD) and maternal and fetal outcome in a relatively large group of patients by a comparison to a well-matched control group. Available information regarding outcome of pregnancy in women with VHD is limited to either anecdotal reports or small series of patients without an appropriate control. A better understanding of the effects of valvular abnormalities on pregnancy outcome is of value for risk assessment and the design of a therapeutic plan. A retrospective evaluation was made of 66 pregnancies in 64 women with VHD cared for at a tertian-care center with a high-risk obstetrics/cardiology clinic and 66 individually selected normal pregnant women matched in age, ethnicity, obstetrical and medical history, time of initial prenatal care, and year of pregnancy. Women with VHD had a significantly higher incidence of congestive heart failure (38% vs. 0%; p < 0.00001), arrhvthmias (15% vs. 0%, p = 0.002), initiation or increase of cardiac medications (41% vs. 2%, p < 0.0001), and hospitalizations (35% vs. 2%, p < 0.0001). Mortality, however, occurred in only one patient (2% vs. 0%, p = NS) with aortic stenosis (AS) and coarctation. Moreover, VHD also had an effect on fetal outcome, resulting in an increased preterm delivery (23% vs. 6%, p = 0.03), intrauterine growth retardation (21% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001), and a reduced birth weight (2,897 +/- 838 g vs. 3,366 +/- 515 g, p = 0.0003). Increased maternal morbidity and unfavorable fetal outcome were seen mostly in patients with moderate and severe mitral stenosis (MS) and AS. Pregnancy in women with MS and AS is associated with marked increase in maternal morbidity and unfavorable effect on fetal outcome, which are related to severity of disease. Despite high maternal morbidity, mortality is rare.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Valvular heart disease and pregnancy part I: native valves.

            Pregnancy in patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) continues to pose a challenge to both physicians and their patients and could be associated with an unfavorable maternal as well as fetal outcome. The purpose of this paper is to review the available clinical data and provide recommendations for the management of patients with VHD during gestation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Percutaneous balloon versus surgical closed commissurotomy for mitral stenosis. A prospective, randomized trial.

              We performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing percutaneous balloon commissurotomy with surgical closed commissurotomy in 40 patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis. Data were analyzed by investigators who were masked to treatment assignment or phase of study. Patients randomized to balloon (n = 20) or surgical (n = 20) commissurotomy had severe mitral stenosis without significant baseline differences (left atrial pressure, 26.1 +/- 4.2 versus 27.6 +/- 6.2 mm Hg; mitral valve gradient, 18.0 +/- 4.2 versus 19.7 +/- 6.3 mm Hg; mitral valve area, 1.0 +/- 0.2 versus 1.0 +/- 0.4 cm2, respectively). At 1-week follow-up after balloon commissurotomy, pulmonary wedge pressure was 14.3 +/- 7.2 mm Hg; mitral valve gradient was 9.6 +/- 5.1 mm Hg; and mitral valve area was 1.6 +/- 0.6 cm2 (all p less than 0.0001). At 1-week follow-up after surgical closed commissurotomy, wedge pressure was 13.7 +/- 5.4 mm Hg; mitral valve gradient was 9.4 +/- 4.2 mm Hg (both p less than 0.0001); and mitral valve area was 1.6 +/- 0.7 cm2 (p less than 0.003). At 8-month follow-up, improvement occurred in both groups: Mitral valve area was 1.6 +/- 0.6 cm2 in the balloon commissurotomy group (p less than 0.002) and was 1.8 +/- 0.6 cm2 in the surgical closed commissurotomy group (p less than 0.0001). There was no difference between the groups at 1-week or 8-month follow-up (all p greater than 0.4). One case of severe mitral regurgitation occurred in each group; complications were otherwise related to transseptal catheterization. There was no death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Cost analysis revealed that balloon commissurotomy may substantially exceed the cost of surgical commissurotomy in developing countries, whereas it may represent a significant savings in industrialized nations. We conclude that percutaneous balloon commissurotomy and surgical closed commissurotomy result in comparable hemodynamic improvement that is sustained through 8 months of follow-up.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Indian Heart J
                Indian Heart J
                Indian Heart Journal
                Elsevier
                0019-4832
                Nov-Dec 2016
                20 May 2016
                : 68
                : 6
                : 780-782
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India
                [b ]Department of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala 673008, India. Tel.: +91 9847015011.Department of Cardiology, Government Medical CollegeKozhikodeKerala673008India vinayakumard@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S0019-4832(16)30063-3
                10.1016/j.ihj.2016.04.017
                5143819
                27931546
                457edf59-ecbe-4566-83b6-680d6e440076
                © 2016 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier B.V.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 September 2015
                : 19 April 2016
                Categories
                Original Article

                mitral stenosis,balloon mitral valvotomy,pregnancy
                mitral stenosis, balloon mitral valvotomy, pregnancy

                Comments

                Comment on this article