58
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Programmable self-assembly of three-dimensional nanostructures from 10 4 unique components

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) are widely used to construct nanoscale structures with ever increasing complexity 114 for possible applications in fields as diverse as structural biology, biophysics, synthetic biology and photonics. The nanostructures are formed through one-pot self-assembly, with early examples typically containing on the order of 10 unique DNA strands. The introduction of DNA origami 4 , which uses many staple strands to fold one long scaffold strand into a desired structure, gave access to kilo- to mega-dalton nanostructures containing about 10 2 unique DNA strands 6, 7, 10, 13 . Aiming for even larger DNA origami structures is in principle possible 15, 16 , but faces the challenge of having to manufacture and route an increasingly long scaffold strand. An alternative and in principle more readily scalable approach uses DNA brick assembly 8, 9 , which doesn’t need a scaffold and instead uses hundreds of short DNA brick strands that self-assemble according to specific inter-brick interactions. First-generation bricks used to create 3D structures are 32-nt long with four 8-nt binding domains that directed 10 2 distinct bricks into well-formed assemblies, but attempts to create larger structures encountered practical challenges and had limited success. 9 Here we show that a new generation of DNA bricks with longer binding domains makes it possible to self-assemble 0.1 – 1 giga-dalton three-dimensional nanostructures from 10 4 unique components, including a 0.5 giga-dalton cuboid containing 30,000 unique bricks and a 1 giga-dalton rotationally symmetric tetramer. We also assemble a cuboid containing 10,000 bricks and 20,000 uniquely addressable ‘nano-voxels’ that serves as a molecular canvas for three-dimensional sculpting, with introduction of sophisticated user-prescribed 3D cavities yielding structures such as letters, a complex helicoid and a teddy bear. We anticipate that, with further optimization, even larger assemblies might be accessible and prove useful as scaffolds or for positioning functional components.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

          For the past 25 years NIH Image and ImageJ software have been pioneers as open tools for the analysis of scientific images. We discuss the origins, challenges and solutions of these two programs, and how their history can serve to advise and inform other software projects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy.

            Recent advances in far-field fluorescence microscopy have led to substantial improvements in image resolution, achieving a near-molecular resolution of 20 to 30 nanometers in the two lateral dimensions. Three-dimensional (3D) nanoscale-resolution imaging, however, remains a challenge. We demonstrated 3D stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) by using optical astigmatism to determine both axial and lateral positions of individual fluorophores with nanometer accuracy. Iterative, stochastic activation of photoswitchable probes enables high-precision 3D localization of each probe, and thus the construction of a 3D image, without scanning the sample. Using this approach, we achieved an image resolution of 20 to 30 nanometers in the lateral dimensions and 50 to 60 nanometers in the axial dimension. This development allowed us to resolve the 3D morphology of nanoscopic cellular structures.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes

              Molecular self-assembly offers a ‘bottom-up’ route to fabrication with subnanometre precision of complex structures from simple components1. DNA has proven a versatile building block2–5 for programmable construction of such objects, including two-dimensional crystals6, nanotubes7–11, and three-dimensional wireframe nanopolyhedra12–17. Templated self-assembly of DNA18 into custom two-dimensional shapes on the megadalton scale has been demonstrated previously with a multiple-kilobase ‘scaffold strand’ that is folded into a flat array of antiparallel helices by interactions with hundreds of oligonucleotide ‘staple strands’19, 20. Here we extend this method to building custom three-dimensional shapes formed as pleated layers of helices constrained to a honeycomb lattice. We demonstrate the design and assembly of nanostructures approximating six shapes — monolith, square nut, railed bridge, genie bottle, stacked cross, slotted cross — with precisely controlled dimensions ranging from 10 to 100 nm. We also show hierarchical assembly of structures such as homomultimeric linear tracks and of heterotrimeric wireframe icosahedra. Proper assembly requires week-long folding times and calibrated monovalent and divalent cation concentrations. We anticipate that our strategy for self-assembling custom three-dimensional shapes will provide a general route to the manufacture of sophisticated devices bearing features on the nanometer scale.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                26 October 2017
                06 December 2017
                06 June 2018
                : 552
                : 7683
                : 72-77
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [2 ]Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
                [3 ]Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried Munich, Germany
                [4 ]Department of Physics and Center for Nanoscience, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80539 Munich, Germany
                [5 ]Centre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS UMR 5048, INSERM U1054, F-34000 Montpellier, France
                [6 ]Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
                [7 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
                [8 ]Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [9 ]Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS UMR 5203, INSERM U1191, F-34000 Montpellier, France
                [10 ]Department of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
                Article
                NIHMS913984
                10.1038/nature24648
                5786436
                29219968
                4587694e-0823-4835-866d-be8cb4743565

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article