43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reducing stigma among healthcare providers to improve mental health services (RESHAPE): protocol for a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial of a stigma reduction intervention for training primary healthcare workers in Nepal

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Non-specialist healthcare providers, including primary and community healthcare workers, in low- and middle-income countries can effectively treat mental illness. However, scaling-up mental health services within existing health systems has been limited by barriers such as stigma against people with mental illness. Therefore, interventions are needed to address attitudes and behaviors among non-specialists. Aimed at addressing this gap, REducing Stigma among Healthc Are Providers to Improv E mental health services (RESHAPE) is an intervention in which social contact with mental health service users is added to training for non-specialist healthcare workers integrating mental health services into primary healthcare.

          Methods

          This protocol describes a mixed methods pilot and feasibility study in primary care centers in Chitwan, Nepal. The qualitative component will include key informant interviews and focus group discussions. The quantitative component consists of a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial (c-RCT), which will establish parameters for a future effectiveness study of RESHAPE compared to training as usual (TAU). Primary healthcare facilities (the cluster unit, k = 34) will be randomized to TAU or RESHAPE. The direct beneficiaries of the intervention are the primary healthcare workers in the facilities ( n = 150); indirect beneficiaries are their patients ( n = 100). The TAU condition is existing mental health training and supervision for primary healthcare workers delivered through the Programme for Improving Mental healthcarE (PRIME) implementing the mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP). The primary objective is to evaluate acceptability and feasibility through qualitative interviews with primary healthcare workers, trainers, and mental health service users. The secondary objective is to collect quantitative information on health worker outcomes including mental health stigma (Social Distance Scale), clinical knowledge (mhGAP), clinical competency (ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors, ENACT), and implicit attitudes (Implicit Association Test, IAT), and patient outcomes including stigma-related barriers to care, daily functioning, and symptoms.

          Discussion

          The pilot and feasibility study will contribute to refining recommendations for implementation of mhGAP and other mental health services in primary healthcare settings in low-resource health systems. The pilot c-RCT findings will inform an effectiveness trial of RESHAPE to advance the evidence-base for optimal approaches to training and supervision for non-specialist providers.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02793271

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: a systematic review update

            Background Interventions that have a better than random chance of increasing nurses' use of research are important to the delivery of quality patient care. However, few reports exist of successful research utilization in nursing interventions. Systematic identification and evaluation of individual characteristics associated with and predicting research utilization may inform the development of research utilization interventions. Objective To update the evidence published in a previous systematic review on individual characteristics influencing research utilization by nurses. Methods As part of a larger systematic review on research utilization instruments, 12 online bibliographic databases were searched. Hand searching of specialized journals and an ancestry search was also conducted. Randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational study designs examining the association between individual characteristics and nurses' use of research were eligible for inclusion. Studies were limited to those published in the English, Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian languages. A vote counting approach to data synthesis was taken. Results A total of 42,770 titles were identified, of which 501 were retrieved. Of these 501 articles, 45 satisfied our inclusion criteria. Articles assessed research utilization in general (n = 39) or kinds of research utilization (n = 6) using self-report survey measures. Individual nurse characteristics were classified according to six categories: beliefs and attitudes, involvement in research activities, information seeking, education, professional characteristics, and socio-demographic/socio-economic characteristics. A seventh category, critical thinking, emerged in studies examining kinds of research utilization. Positive relationships, at statistically significant levels, for general research utilization were found in four categories: beliefs and attitudes, information seeking, education, and professional characteristics. The only characteristic assessed in a sufficient number of studies and with consistent findings for the kinds of research utilization was attitude towards research; this characteristic had a positive association with instrumental and overall research utilization. Conclusions This review reinforced conclusions in the previous review with respect to positive relationships between general research utilization and: beliefs and attitudes, and current role. Furthermore, attending conferences/in-services, having a graduate degree in nursing, working in a specialty area, and job satisfaction were also identified as individual characteristics important to research utilization. While these findings hold promise as potential targets of future research utilization interventions, there were methodological problems inherent in many of the studies that necessitate their findings be replicated in further research using more robust study designs and multivariate assessment methods.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS).

              Mental health provider attitudes toward organizational change have not been well studied. Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) into real-world settings represent organizational change that may be limited or facilitated by provider attitudes toward adoption of new treatments, interventions, and practices. A brief measure of mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of EBPs was developed and attitudes were examined in relation to a set of provider individual difference and organizational characteristics. Participants were 322 public sector clinical service workers from 51 programs providing mental health services to children and adolescents and their families. Four dimensions of attitudes toward adoption of EBPs were identified: (1) intuitive Appeal of EBP, (2) likelihood of adopting EBP given Requirements to do so, (3) Openness to new practices, and (4) perceived Divergence of usual practice with research-based/academically developed interventions. Provider attitudes varied by education level, level of experience, and organizational context. Attitudes toward adoption of EBPs can be reliably measured and vary in relation to individual differences and service context. EBP implementation plans should include consideration of mental health service provider attitudes as a potential aid to improve the process and effectiveness of dissemination efforts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                bkohrt@gwu.edu
                mark.jordans@kcl.ac.uk
                liz.turner@duke.edu
                kathleen.sikkema@duke.edu
                luitelnp@gmail.com
                sauharda.rai@gmail.com
                daisy.singla@utoronto.ca
                jagannathlc@gmail.com
                crick.lund@uct.ac.za
                vikram_patel@hms.harvard.edu
                Journal
                Pilot Feasibility Stud
                Pilot Feasibility Stud
                Pilot and Feasibility Studies
                BioMed Central (London )
                2055-5784
                24 January 2018
                24 January 2018
                2018
                : 4
                : 36
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7961, GRID grid.26009.3d, Duke Global Health Institute, , Duke University, ; Durham, USA
                [2 ]Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Baluwatar, Nepal
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9510, GRID grid.253615.6, Department of Psychiatry, , George Washington University, ; 2120 L St NW, Suite #600, Washington, DC 20037 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, GRID grid.13097.3c, King’s College London, , Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, ; London, UK
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7961, GRID grid.26009.3d, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, , Duke University, ; Durham, USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7961, GRID grid.26009.3d, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, , Duke University, ; Durham, USA
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, GRID grid.17063.33, Department of Psychiatry, Sinai Health System and University of Toronto, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0473 9881, GRID grid.416166.2, Lunenfeld-Tanebaum Research Institute, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [9 ]Independent Citizens Coalition Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 1151, GRID grid.7836.a, Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, , University of Cape Town, ; Cape Town, South Africa
                [11 ]GRID grid.471010.3, Sangath, ; Porvorim, Goa India
                [12 ]ISNI 000000041936754X, GRID grid.38142.3c, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, , Harvard University, ; Boston, USA
                [13 ]ISNI 000000041936754X, GRID grid.38142.3c, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, , Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, USA
                Article
                234
                10.1186/s40814-018-0234-3
                5781273
                29403650
                458b3e47-4a5d-4096-b3f9-f2e74674936a
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 7 July 2017
                : 16 January 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000025, National Institute of Mental Health;
                Award ID: K01MH104310
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002992, Department for International Development, UK Government;
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                attitudes,competence,low- and middle-income countries,mental health,non-specialists,primary care,service users,task-shifting,training,stigma

                Comments

                Comment on this article