0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Responses of Serum LH and FSH to the Removal of Steroid Feedback Inhibition

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sex differences in the serum gonadotropin responses to the removal of feedback inhibition were studied in rats which had been given chronic implants of testosterone (T) capsules at the time of castration. Following capsule removal, serum LH increased significantly within 24 h in males, but only after 3 or 4 days in females. Adult females, sterilized with a single injection of 10 μg of testosterone propionate (TP) on postnatal day 3, 4, or 5, showed a rapid ‘male-like’ LH response to removal of the T capsules. However, the rise in circulating LH after capsule removal in adult females treated with 500 μg of TP on day 4 of age was even slower than that observed in control females. The pituitary LH responses to a single intravenous injection of LHRH were similar in androgenized and control females when tested after castration; however, a significantly impaired response was seen in the 500-μg TP females during T treatment. Although the T capsules used in these studies suppressed circulating LH in control and androgenized females, basal serum FSH titers 3 weeks after ovariectomy and T-capsule implantation, especially in the low-dose androgenized females, were significantly elevated when compared with intact values. Reliable sex differences were not observed in the FSH response to T-capsule removal. To examine the neural control of the ‘postcastration’ response of circulating gonadotropins, male and female rats were subjected to anterior deafferentation of the hypothalamus (AD) at the time of gonadectomy and T-capsule implantation. 3 weeks later, the capsules were removed. The LH response to T-capsule removal was similar in AD and sham-cut males, with significant increases being observed after 1 day. Plasma LH titers in the AD females paralleled those of the sham-cut females, with neither group showing a sustained increase until 3 days after T-capsule removal. These findings indicate that the rapid LH response to the removal of feedback inhibition which is characteristic of males, can be induced in females by neonatal, low-dose androgen treatment. A high dose of androgen administered neonatally did not masculinize the LH response to the removal of feedback inhibition possibly due to a disruptive effect on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. In addition, the anterior inputs to the medial basal hypothalamus, which are necessary for cyclic gonadotropin secretion in female rats, do not appear to be responsible for sex differences in the ‘postcastration’ LH response.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          NEN
          Neuroendocrinology
          10.1159/issn.0028-3835
          Neuroendocrinology
          S. Karger AG
          0028-3835
          1423-0194
          1983
          1983
          27 March 2008
          : 37
          : 2
          : 122-130
          Affiliations
          Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.; Department of Anatomy and Brain Research Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif., USA
          Article
          123530 Neuroendocrinology 1983;37:122–130
          10.1159/000123530
          6412151
          © 1983 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article