90
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An Incompatibility between a Mitochondrial tRNA and Its Nuclear-Encoded tRNA Synthetase Compromises Development and Fitness in Drosophila

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mitochondrial transcription, translation, and respiration require interactions between genes encoded in two distinct genomes, generating the potential for mutations in nuclear and mitochondrial genomes to interact epistatically and cause incompatibilities that decrease fitness. Mitochondrial-nuclear epistasis for fitness has been documented within and between populations and species of diverse taxa, but rarely has the genetic or mechanistic basis of these mitochondrial–nuclear interactions been elucidated, limiting our understanding of which genes harbor variants causing mitochondrial–nuclear disruption and of the pathways and processes that are impacted by mitochondrial–nuclear coevolution. Here we identify an amino acid polymorphism in the Drosophila melanogaster nuclear-encoded mitochondrial tyrosyl–tRNA synthetase that interacts epistatically with a polymorphism in the D. simulans mitochondrial-encoded tRNA Tyr to significantly delay development, compromise bristle formation, and decrease fecundity. The incompatible genotype specifically decreases the activities of oxidative phosphorylation complexes I, III, and IV that contain mitochondrial-encoded subunits. Combined with the identity of the interacting alleles, this pattern indicates that mitochondrial protein translation is affected by this interaction. Our findings suggest that interactions between mitochondrial tRNAs and their nuclear-encoded tRNA synthetases may be targets of compensatory molecular evolution. Human mitochondrial diseases are often genetically complex and variable in penetrance, and the mitochondrial–nuclear interaction we document provides a plausible mechanism to explain this complexity.

          Author Summary

          The ancient symbiosis between two prokaryotes that gave rise to the eukaryotic cell has required genomic cooperation for at least a billion years. Eukaryotic cells respire through the coordinated expression of their nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, both of which encode the proteins and RNAs required for mitochondrial transcription, translation, and aerobic respiration. Genetic interactions between these genomes are hypothesized to influence the effects of mitochondrial mutations on disease and drive mitochondrial–nuclear coevolution. Here we characterize the molecular cause and the cellular and organismal consequences of a mitochondrial–nuclear interaction in Drosophila between naturally occurring mutations in a mitochondrial tRNA and a nuclear-encoded tRNA synthetase. These mutations have little effect on their own; but, when combined, they severely compromise development and reproduction. tRNA synthetases attach the appropriate amino acid onto their cognate tRNA, and this reaction is required for efficient and accurate protein synthesis. We show that disruption of this interaction compromises mitochondrial function, providing hypotheses for the variable penetrance of diseases associated with mitochondrial tRNAs and for which pathways and processes are likely to be affected by mitochondrial–nuclear interactions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny.

          Comparative analysis of multiple genomes in a phylogenetic framework dramatically improves the precision and sensitivity of evolutionary inference, producing more robust results than single-genome analyses can provide. The genomes of 12 Drosophila species, ten of which are presented here for the first time (sechellia, simulans, yakuba, erecta, ananassae, persimilis, willistoni, mojavensis, virilis and grimshawi), illustrate how rates and patterns of sequence divergence across taxa can illuminate evolutionary processes on a genomic scale. These genome sequences augment the formidable genetic tools that have made Drosophila melanogaster a pre-eminent model for animal genetics, and will further catalyse fundamental research on mechanisms of development, cell biology, genetics, disease, neurobiology, behaviour, physiology and evolution. Despite remarkable similarities among these Drosophila species, we identified many putatively non-neutral changes in protein-coding genes, non-coding RNA genes, and cis-regulatory regions. These may prove to underlie differences in the ecology and behaviour of these diverse species.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Computational method to predict mitochondrially imported proteins and their targeting sequences.

            Most of the proteins that are used in mitochondria are imported through the double membrane of the organelle. The information that guides the protein to mitochondria is contained in its sequence and structure, although no direct evidence can be obtained. In this article, discriminant analysis has been performed with 47 parameters and a large set of mitochondrial proteins extracted from the SwissProt database. A computational method that facilitates the analysis and objective prediction of mitochondrially imported proteins has been developed. If only the amino acid sequence is considered, 75-97% of the mitochondrial proteins studied have been predicted to be imported into mitochondria. Moreover, the existence of mitochondrial-targeting sequences is predicted in 76-94% of the analyzed mitochondrial precursor proteins. As a practical application, the number of unknown yeast open reading frames that might be mitochondrial proteins has been predicted, which revealed that many of them are clustered.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Human mitochondrial tRNAs: biogenesis, function, structural aspects, and diseases.

              Mitochondria are eukaryotic organelles that generate most of the energy in the cell by oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Each mitochondrion contains multiple copies of a closed circular double-stranded DNA genome (mtDNA). Human (mammalian) mtDNA encodes 13 essential subunits of the inner membrane complex responsible for OXPHOS. These mRNAs are translated by the mitochondrial protein synthesis machinery, which uses the 22 species of mitochondrial tRNAs (mt tRNAs) encoded by mtDNA. The unique structural features of mt tRNAs distinguish them from cytoplasmic tRNAs bearing the canonical cloverleaf structure. The genes encoding mt tRNAs are highly susceptible to point mutations, which are a primary cause of mitochondrial dysfunction and are associated with a wide range of pathologies. A large number of nuclear factors involved in the biogenesis and function of mt tRNAs have been identified and characterized, including processing endonucleases, tRNA-modifying enzymes, and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. These nuclear factors are also targets of pathogenic mutations linked to various diseases, indicating the functional importance of mt tRNAs for mitochondrial activity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                January 2013
                January 2013
                31 January 2013
                : 9
                : 1
                : e1003238
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
                [3 ]Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
                University of Wisconsin–Madison, United States of America
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: CDM DMR KLM. Performed the experiments: CDM MAH MAS DNA DMR KLM. Analyzed the data: CDM MAH DMR KLM. Wrote the paper: KLM.

                [¤a]

                Current address: Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America

                [¤b]

                Current address: Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

                Article
                PGENETICS-D-12-02557
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1003238
                3561102
                23382693
                4635df47-12ee-4a94-87b1-7204cee92beb
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 11 October 2012
                : 27 November 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                This research was supported by funds from NIH NRSA GM072399 and NSF DEB-0839348 to CDM, NIH F31AG040925 to MAH, the Indiana University Hutton Honors College to MAS, NIH R01GM067862 and R01AG027849 to DMR, and NIH NRSA GM076812 and Indiana University to KLM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Developmental Biology
                Evolutionary Biology
                Genetics
                Model Organisms

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article