25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      BikeMaps.org: A Global Tool for Collision and Near Miss Mapping

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There are many public health benefits to cycling, such as chronic disease reduction and improved air quality. Real and perceived concerns about safety are primary barriers to new ridership. Due to limited forums for official reporting of cycling incidents, lack of comprehensive data is limiting our ability to study cycling safety and conduct surveillance. Our goal is to introduce BikeMaps.org, a new website developed by the authors for crowd-source mapping of cycling collisions and near misses. BikeMaps.org is a global mapping system that allows citizens to map locations of cycling incidents and report on the nature of the event. Attributes collected are designed for spatial modeling research on predictors of safety and risk, and to aid surveillance and planning. Released in October 2014, within 2 months the website had more than 14,000 visitors and mapping in 14 countries. Collisions represent 38% of reports (134/356) and near misses 62% (222/356). In our pilot city, Victoria, Canada, citizens mapped data equivalent to about 1 year of official cycling collision reports within 2 months via BikeMaps.org. Using report completeness as an indicator, early reports indicate that data are of high quality with 50% being fully attributed and another 10% having only one missing attribute. We are advancing this technology, with the development of a mobile App, improved data visualization, real-time altering of hazard reports, and automated open-source tools for data sharing. Researchers and citizens interested in utilizing the BikeMaps.org technology can get involved by encouraging citizen mapping in their region.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: a review of the literature

            Background Bicycling has the potential to improve fitness, diminish obesity, and reduce noise, air pollution, and greenhouse gases associated with travel. However, bicyclists incur a higher risk of injuries requiring hospitalization than motor vehicle occupants. Therefore, understanding ways of making bicycling safer and increasing rates of bicycling are important to improving population health. There is a growing body of research examining transportation infrastructure and the risk of injury to bicyclists. Methods We reviewed studies of the impact of transportation infrastructure on bicyclist safety. The results were tabulated within two categories of infrastructure, namely that at intersections (e.g. roundabouts, traffic lights) or between intersections on "straightaways" (e.g. bike lanes or paths). To assess safety, studies examining the following outcomes were included: injuries; injury severity; and crashes (collisions and/or falls). Results The literature to date on transportation infrastructure and cyclist safety is limited by the incomplete range of facilities studied and difficulties in controlling for exposure to risk. However, evidence from the 23 papers reviewed (eight that examined intersections and 15 that examined straightaways) suggests that infrastructure influences injury and crash risk. Intersection studies focused mainly on roundabouts. They found that multi-lane roundabouts can significantly increase risk to bicyclists unless a separated cycle track is included in the design. Studies of straightaways grouped facilities into few categories, such that facilities with potentially different risks may have been classified within a single category. Results to date suggest that sidewalks and multi-use trails pose the highest risk, major roads are more hazardous than minor roads, and the presence of bicycle facilities (e.g. on-road bike routes, on-road marked bike lanes, and off-road bike paths) was associated with the lowest risk. Conclusion Evidence is beginning to accumulate that purpose-built bicycle-specific facilities reduce crashes and injuries among cyclists, providing the basis for initial transportation engineering guidelines for cyclist safety. Street lighting, paved surfaces, and low-angled grades are additional factors that appear to improve cyclist safety. Future research examining a greater variety of infrastructure would allow development of more detailed guidelines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                30 March 2015
                2015
                : 3
                : 53
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Spatial Pattern Analysis and Research (SPAR) Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Victoria , Victoria, BC, Canada
                [2] 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Center for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Simon Fraser University , Vancouver, BC, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jay E. Maddock, Texas A&M University, USA

                Reviewed by: Katie M. Heinrich, Kansas State University, USA; James Aaron Hipp, Washington University in St. Louis, USA

                *Correspondence: Trisalyn A. Nelson, Spatial Pattern Analysis and Research (SPAR) Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3060 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 3R4, Canada e-mail: trisalyn@ 123456uvic.ca

                This article was submitted to Public Health Education and Promotion, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health.

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2015.00053
                4378118
                25870852
                4664ca43-7f3e-464c-ad48-30db783ff0f0
                Copyright © 2015 Nelson, Denouden, Jestico, Laberee and Winters.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 February 2015
                : 16 March 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 26, Pages: 8, Words: 5590
                Funding
                Funded by: Canada’s National Science and Engineering Research Council
                Funded by: Canadian Automobile Association
                Funded by: Capital Regional District’s Active Transportation Special Event Funding Program
                Categories
                Public Health
                Technology Report

                active transportation,bicycling safety,near miss,citizen science,cycling safety surveillance

                Comments

                Comment on this article