4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Factors associated with the implementation of a vegetable and fruit program in a population of Australian elementary schools.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Implementation of vegetable and fruit programs in schools is less than optimal. This study aimed to identify, using a theoretical framework, factors associated with implementation of a school vegetable and fruit program; that provides a time in class for children to consume a piece of vegetable or fruit they have brought from home. Three hundred and three randomly selected school principals across the state of New South Wales, Australia responded to a 25-min telephone survey. Principals were asked if their school had implemented a vegetable and fruit program, and which of 12 factors from Damschroder's consolidated framework for implementation research had facilitated or impeded implementation. Multiple logistic regression models examined the association between such factors and program implementation. Seventy-eight percent of schools had a vegetable and fruit program. Schools were significantly more likely to implement the program if the principal believed that: the program was effective (OR = 2.97; P < 0.02); they had sufficient resources to implement the program (OR = 4.22; P < 0.0001); the program would not be difficult to implement (OR = 10.16; P< 0.0001) and that the program was as important as other school priorities (OR = 2.45; P < 0.02). Realizing the intended benefits of vegetable and fruit programs requires widespread implementation by schools. Consideration of principal beliefs about the program effectiveness, resources, difficultly and relative importance in program implementation strategies appear key to increasing program implementation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Health Educ Res
          Health education research
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          1465-3648
          0268-1153
          April 01 2017
          : 32
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, Locked Bag No 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287, Australia.
          [2 ] School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.
          [3 ] Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.
          [4 ] Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia.
          Article
          3096420
          10.1093/her/cyx038
          28380629
          466ab41f-0211-4f4f-a9ff-eb6710cc248e
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article