20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Seasonal Preservation Success of the Marine Dinoflagellate Coral Symbiont, Symbiodinium sp.

      research-article
      1 , 2 , * , 1 , 2
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Coral reefs are some of the most diverse and productive ecosystems on the planet, but are threatened by global and local stressors, mandating the need for incorporating ex situ conservation practices. One approach that is highly protective is the development of genome resource banks that preserve the species and its genetic diversity. A critical component of the reef are the endosymbiotic algae, Symbiodinium sp., living within most coral that transfer energy-rich sugars to their hosts. Although Symbiodinium are maintained alive in culture collections around the world, the cryopreservation of these algae to prevent loss and genetic drift is not well-defined. This study examined the quantum yield physiology and freezing protocols that resulted in survival of Symbiodinium at 24 h post-thawing. Only the ultra-rapid procedure called vitrification resulted in success whereas conventional slow freezing protocols did not. We determined that success also depended on using a thin film of agar with embedded Symbiodinium on Cryotops, a process that yielded a post-thaw viability of >50% in extracted and vitrified Symbiodinium from Fungia scutaria, Pocillopora damicornis and Porites compressa. Additionally, there also was a seasonal influence on vitrification success as the best post-thaw survival of F. scutaria occurred in winter and spring compared to summer and fall (P < 0.05). These findings lay the foundation for developing a viable genome resource bank for the world’s Symbiodinium that, in turn, will not only protect this critical element of coral functionality but serve as a resource for understanding the complexities of symbiosis, support selective breeding experiments to develop more thermally resilient strains of coral, and provide a ‘gold-standard’ genomics collection, allowing for full genomic sequencing of unique Symbiodinium strains.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Landscape ecology of algal symbionts creates variation in episodes of coral bleaching.

          Reef-building corals are obligate, mutualistic symbioses of heterotrophic animals and phototrophic dinoflagellates (Symbiodinium spp.). Contrary to the earlier, widely accepted belief that corals harbour only one symbiont, we found that the ecologically dominant Caribbean corals Montastraea annularis and M. faveolata can act as hosts to dynamic, multi-species communities of Symbiodinium. Composition of these communities follows gradients of environmental irradiance, implying that physiological acclimatization is not the only mechanism by which corals cope with environmental heterogeneity. The importance of this diversity was underlined by analysis of a natural episode of coral bleaching. Patterns of bleaching could be explained by the preferential elimination of a symbiont associated with low irradiance from the brightest parts of its distribution. Comparative analyses of symbionts before and after bleaching from the same corals supported this interpretation, and suggested that some corals were protected from bleaching by hosting an additional symbiont that is more tolerant of high irradiance and temperature. This 'natural experiment' suggests that temporal and spatial variability can favour the coexistence of diverse symbionts within a host, despite the potential for destabilizing competition among them.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method.

            Vitrification is frequently referred to as a novel technology of cryopreservation in embryology, although some young embryologists were born after its first successful application. Unfortunately, in spite of the accumulated evidence regarding its enormous potential value, most domestic animal and human laboratories use exclusively the traditional slow-rate freezing with its compromised efficiency and inconsistency. The purpose of this paper is to clarify terms and conditions, to summarize arguments supporting or disapproving the use of vitrification, and to outline its role among assisted reproductive technologies. To provide evidence for the potential significance of vitrification, achievements with the Cryotop technology, an advanced version of the "minimal volume approaches" is analyzed. This technology alone has resulted in more healthy babies after cryopreservation of blastocysts than any other vitrification technique, and more successful human oocyte vitrification resulting in normal births than any other cryopreservation method. The value of this method is also demonstrated by achievements in the field of domestic animal embryology. A modification of the technique using a hermetically sealed container for storage may help to eliminate potential dangers of disease transmission and open the way for widespread application for cryopreservation at all phases of oocyte and preimplantation embryo development in mammals.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Genetic diversity of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                30 September 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 9
                : e0136358
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Reproductive Sciences, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute- National Zoological Park, Front Royal, VA, United States of America
                [2 ]Hawai'i Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii, Kaneohe, HI, United States of America
                King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, SAUDI ARABIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: MH VLC. Performed the experiments: VLC. Analyzed the data: MH VLC. Wrote the paper: MH VLC.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-20507
                10.1371/journal.pone.0136358
                4589415
                26422237
                46723d0a-fc6e-44dd-afd3-12559dd79941
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 12 May 2015
                : 31 July 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Pages: 16
                Funding
                These experiments were sponsored by funding provided by the Smithsonian Institution ( http://www.si.edu), the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology ( http://www.uhawaii.edu/HIMB), the Roddenberry Foundation ( http://roddenberryfoundation.org/), the Anela Kolohe Foundation ( http://www.guidestar.org/organizations/54-6794278/anela-kolohe-foundation.aspx), Skippy Frank Translational Medicine Fund ( http://www.rockpa.org/page.aspx?pid=340), Compton Foundation ( https://www.comptonfoundation.org/), and the Cedar Hill Foundation (no website available). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All of the data is contained within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article