17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Characterization and Dating of Blue Ballpoint Pen Inks Using Principal Component Analysis of UV-Vis Absorption Spectra, IR Spectroscopy, and HPTLC : CHARACTERIZATION AND DATING OF BLUE BALLPOINT

      , , ,
      Journal of Forensic Sciences
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Application of the micro-FTIR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and XRF method examination of inks.

          In routine examination of inks on questioned documents non-destructive analytical methods, such as microscopic and optical techniques are applied first. However, they are often insufficient to identify the inks used for the preparation of the document. In such cases, it is necessary to apply chemical methods that normally cause partial destruction of the examined material. The aim of this work was to evaluate the possibility of discrimination between inks by the use of spectrometric methods, i.e. micro-FTIR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and XRF. About 70 samples of blue and black ballpoint pen and gel inks were examined. It was found that about 90% of the samples of the same type and colour could be distinguished using these methods.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multivariate chemometrics for the forensic discrimination of blue ball-point pen inks based on their Vis spectra.

            Fifty blue ball-point pen inks of five different brands were examined on the basis of the Vis spectrum of their ethanolic solutions with a view to achieving good discrimination between them. Samples were dissolved in absolute ethanol and their absorbance values in the range of 400-750 nm, after appropriate transformations, were used as variables in the multivariate statistical techniques of cluster analysis (CA), principal component analysis (PCA) and discriminant analysis (DA). These techniques were used successively so that an effective and meaningful discriminant model was calculated in the final step. The initial 351 variables (log10 transformed ink absorption values at each wavelength) were subjected to a K-means CA over the objects (samples) and only 20 variables were retained. Principal component analysis was used to detect any outliers (four samples were removed) and the remaining samples were re-subjected to PCA to decide how many variables to enter into DA and whether original variables or components should be used. It was found that the first three principal components (in accordance with the Kaiser criterion) were good descriptors of the 20 original variables (96.97% of the data variance was explained) and their use as latent variables in DA lead to low average variable redundancy (33.6%) in the discriminant model. The calculated model had a Wilks' lambda of 8.98 x 10(-5) and was statistically significant at the P = 0.05 level. The post hoc classification of the training dataset was 100% correct. From the DA results and the component loadings it was found that discrimination was achieved on the basis of differences in the shape of the absorption bands as well as their relative intensities. The method was therefore deemed appropriate for supporting exclusionary forensic purposes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Classification and individualisation of black ballpoint pen inks using principal component analysis of UV–vis absorption spectra

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Forensic Sciences
                Wiley
                00221198
                July 2012
                July 2012
                March 05 2012
                : 57
                : 4
                : 1087-1093
                Article
                10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02091.x
                46b8829a-d5f5-4587-adce-a1c38cba04c3
                © 2012

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article