77
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preventing Chronic Disease in Women of Reproductive Age: Opportunities for Health Promotion and Preventive Services

      brief-report
      , MD, MPH, , PhD
      Preventing Chronic Disease
      Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Improving the health of women of reproductive age extends beyond focusing on pregnancy and birth outcomes. Approaching women's health from a life course perspective offers an opportunity to reduce overall and pregnancy-related illnesses and deaths and to eliminate disparities through enhanced health promotion and disease prevention (1). Recent evaluations suggest that pregnancy-related illnesses and deaths resulting from chronic disease may be increasing. In 2009, the average age for mothers at first birth was 28 years, compared with 21.4 years in 1970 (2). Older women have an increased prevalence of chronic medical conditions, leading to higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. According to a nationally representative study examining trends in US hospitalizations from 1995-2006, the severity of chronic heart disease among women hospitalized during pregnancy may have increased (3). Additionally, data from the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth) indicate shifts in the proportion of maternal deaths from traditional direct causes of maternal deaths (eg, caused by hemorrhage or infection) toward more chronic conditions, particularly cardiovascular diseases (4). Women of reproductive age also are experiencing increases in the prevalence of chronic disease–related risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, high cholesterol, and asthma (5). Despite these increases, prevention opportunities exist to improve women's health during their reproductive years and beyond and to improve the health of future generations. In the November 2011 issue of Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD), articles by Farr et al (6), Tong et al (7), Hayes et al (8), and Amparo et al (9) highlighted the prevalence of chronic disease conditions and risk factors that affect the health of women of reproductive age, including behavioral and environmental factors such as smoking, alcohol use, depression, physical inactivity, and lack of access to health services. Additionally, Farr et al (10), Tovar et al (11), Robbins et al (12), and Zera et al (13) summarized various chronic disease screening recommendations and interventions targeted to reach women of reproductive age and improve their health throughout life. Health promotion for women of reproductive age includes increasing epidemiology capacity at the state, local, territorial, and tribal level to effectively use data related to chronic disease prevalence and risk. As an example, as part of the CDC Maternal and Child Health Epidemiology Program, researchers assigned to state health departments collaborate in maternal and child health and chronic disease programs in a partnership with states and the Maternal and Child Health Bureau in the Health Resource Services Administration. In the November 2011 issue of PCD, Hayes et al (8) and Cheng and Patel (14) illustrated well the importance of building capacity at county and state health department and even clinic levels to address chronic disease prevention in women of reproductive age. The US Department of Health and Human Services adoption of the Institute of Medicine's recommendations of preventive services for women (www.iom.edu/reports/2011/clinical-preventive-services-for-women-closing-the-gaps.aspx) provides an opportunity to further extend clinical guidance for women's reproductive and wellness health screening through the Affordable Care Act. These recommendations provide no-cost coverage for 1) an annual well-woman preventive health visit, including preconception care, and additional visits depending on a woman's health status, needs, and other risk factors; 2) an array of contraceptives approved by the Food and Drug Administration; 3) human papillomavirus testing as part of cervical cancer screening; 4) annual counseling for sexually transmitted infections and screening for human immunodeficiency virus in sexually active women; 5) screening for gestational diabetes in pregnant women; and 6) comprehensive support and counseling for breastfeeding. Adapted from earlier released guidelines of the World Health Organization (15), the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (16) has been adopted by public health and clinical organizations such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (17). In 2010, CDC developed national guidelines that provide evidence-based information on safe and effective options for contraception for various medical conditions affecting US reproductive-aged women, including teenagers. Safe and effective use of and ready access to contraception may optimize a woman's health by providing additional time to address a preexisting health condition or risk factor (eg, diabetes, hypertension, smoking) before pregnancy and by preventing unintended pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with poor health. CDC's Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) (www.cdc.gov/prams), an annual survey of women with a recent live birth, provides coverage of nearly 80% of births nationwide and monitors not only trends in certain chronic diseases (eg, diabetes, hypertension, postpartum depressive symptoms) but also trends in key risk behaviors underlying many chronic diseases (eg, obesity, tobacco use, physical inactivity). PRAMS data on preconception and interconception care indicators can help programs anticipate prevention needs (18). For example, findings from Louisiana PRAMS on the prevalence of chronic disease risk factors among women of reproductive age influenced the development and implementation of a preconception health awareness project, The Stork Reality. This project targeted women who do not have regular medical homes to provide preconception and interconception health services (www.storkreality.com). Surveillance of state health policies (eg, state tobacco control policies, smoke-free air laws, spending, taxes on cigarettes) can also be evaluated with PRAMS data to examine their effect on health outcomes before, during, and after pregnancy. A key strategy to improve the health of reproductive-aged women is to improve their continuity of care beyond pregnancy. Reproductive and postpartum health visits offer opportunities for providers to promote preventive care, screen for chronic diseases, and provide referrals to appropriate interventions. Further research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of interventions initiated during reproductive and postpartum health care visits, such as those that aim to reduce smoking, obesity and overweight, hypertension, high cholesterol, and diabetes (eg, screening for chronic diseases and associated risk factors during family planning or sexually transmitted disease clinic visits). Through existing funding initiatives and new funding opportunities from the Affordable Care Act, approaches for broad public health interventions can improve the health of women of reproductive age by supporting activities that address social policies, systems, and practices that improve population health. A public health approach to chronic disease prevention through community-based prevention efforts can help address health promotion among women of reproductive age.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1998 to 2005.

          To estimate the risk of women dying from pregnancy complications in the United States and to examine the risk factors for and changes in the medical causes of these deaths. De-identified copies of death certificates for women who died during or within 1 year of pregnancy and matching birth or fetal death certificates for 1998 through 2005 were received by the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System from the 50 states, New York City, and Washington, DC. Causes of death and factors associated with them were identified, and pregnancy-related mortality ratios (pregnancy-related deaths per 100,000 live births) were calculated. The aggregate pregnancy-related mortality ratio for the 8-year period was 14.5 per 100,000 live births, which is higher than any period in the previous 20 years of the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System. African-American women continued to have a three- to four-fold higher risk of pregnancy-related death. The proportion of deaths attributable to hemorrhage and hypertensive disorders declined from previous years, whereas the proportion from medical conditions, particularly cardiovascular, increased. Seven causes of death--hemorrhage, thrombotic pulmonary embolism, infection, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cardiomyopathy, cardiovascular conditions, and noncardiovascular medical conditions--each contributed 10% to 13% of deaths. The reasons for the reported increase in pregnancy-related mortality are unclear; possible factors include an increase in the risk of women dying, changed coding with the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, and the addition by states of pregnancy checkboxes to the death certificate. State-based maternal death reviews and maternal quality collaboratives have the potential to identify deaths, review the factors associated with them, and take action on the findings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Postpartum Screening for Diabetes Among Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

            Introduction To make recommendations for future clinical, public health, and research practices for women with abnormal glucose tolerance during pregnancy, we reviewed the latest evidence regarding rates of postpartum diabetes screening and types of screening tests. Methods We searched PubMed for journal articles published from January 2008 through December 2010 that reported on postpartum screening and studies designed to prevent progression to type 2 diabetes among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Two authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts from 265 articles. Results From 34% to 73% of women with GDM completed postpartum glucose screening. Predictors of higher screening rates included older age, nulliparity, and higher income or education. Screening rates varied by race/ethnicity; Asian women were more likely to be screened than were other racial/ethnic minorities. Women who received prenatal care, who were treated with insulin during pregnancy, or who completed a 6-week postpartum visit were also more likely to receive screening. A moderate proportion of women screened had type 2 diabetes (1.2%-4.5%) or prediabetes (12.2%-36.0%). Conclusion Rates of postpartum screening among women with a history of GDM are low; only half of women in most populations are screened. Our findings can inform future screening initiatives designed to overcome barriers to screening for both providers and patients. Well-designed lifestyle interventions specific to women with a history of abnormal glucose tolerance during pregnancy and also studies to determine the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions will be important to help prevent progression to diabetes among these high-risk women.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chronic heart disease and severe obstetric morbidity among hospitalisations for pregnancy in the USA: 1995-2006.

              to describe changes in characteristics of delivery and postpartum hospitalisations with chronic heart disease from 1995 to 2006. cross-sectional study. USA, nationwide hospital discharge data. a total of 47 882 817 delivery hospitalisations and 660 038 postpartum hospitalisations. adjusted odds ratios describing the associations between chronic maternal heart disease and severe obstetric complications were obtained from multivariable logistic models. The contribution of chronic heart disease to severe morbidity was estimated using adjusted population-attributable fractions. prevalence and trends in chronic heart disease, rate and risk of severe obstetric complications. in 2004-2006, about 1.4% of delivery hospitalisations were complicated with chronic heart disease. No substantial changes in the overall prevalence of chronic heart disease among hospitalisations for delivery were observed from 1995-1997 to 2004-2006. Even so, a linear increase was found for specific congenital heart disease, cardiac dysrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure (P < 0.01). During this same period the rate of postpartum hospitalisations with chronic heart disease tripled (P < 0.01). Severe complications during hospitalisations for delivery among women with chronic heart disease were more common in 2004-2006 than in 1995-1997. In 2004-2006, 64.5% of the cases of acute myocardial infarction, 57.5% of the instances of cardiac arrest/ventricular fibrillation, 27.8% of in-hospital mortality and 26.0% of the cases of adult respiratory distress syndrome were associated with hospitalisations with chronic heart disease. in the USA chronic heart disease among women hospitalised during pregnancy may have increased in severity from 1995 to 2006.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta Georgia
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
                ,
                Journal
                Prev Chronic Dis
                Prev Chronic Dis
                Preventing Chronic Disease
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                1545-1151
                2012
                12 January 2012
                : 9
                : E34
                Affiliations
                National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta Georgia
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
                Article
                PCDv9_11_0281
                10.5888/pcd9.110281
                3310066
                22239749
                46c52cd6-3a94-478d-8b35-c1ca982a5f0f
                Copyright @ 2012
                History
                Categories
                Editorial

                Health & Social care
                Health & Social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article