50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Health Literacy Practices and Educational Competencies for Health Professionals: A Consensus Study

      research-article
      , ,
      Journal of Health Communication
      Taylor & Francis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Health care professionals often lack adequate knowledge about health literacy and the skills needed to address low health literacy among patients and their caregivers. Many promising practices for mitigating the effects of low health literacy are not used consistently. Improving health literacy training for health care professionals has received increasing emphasis in recent years. The development and evaluation of curricula for health professionals has been limited by the lack of agreed-upon educational competencies in this area. This study aimed to identify a set of health literacy educational competencies and target behaviors, or practices, relevant to the training of all health care professionals. The authors conducted a thorough literature review to identify a comprehensive list of potential health literacy competencies and practices, which they categorized into 1 or more educational domains (i.e., knowledge, skills, attitudes) or a practice domain. The authors stated each item in operationalized language following Bloom's Taxonomy. The authors then used a modified Delphi method to identify consensus among a group of 23 health professions education experts representing 11 fields in the health professions. Participants rated their level of agreement as to whether a competency or practice was both appropriate and important for all health professions students. A predetermined threshold of 70% agreement was used to define consensus. After 4 rounds of ratings and modifications, consensus agreement was reached on 62 out of 64 potential educational competencies (24 knowledge items, 27 skill items, and 11 attitude items), and 32 out of 33 potential practices. This study is the first known attempt to develop consensus on a list of health literacy practices and to translate recommended health literacy practices into an agreed-upon set of measurable educational competencies for health professionals. Further work is needed to prioritize the competencies and practices in terms of relative importance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interventions for individuals with low health literacy: a systematic review.

          The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recently called for action on health literacy. An important first step is defining the current state of the literature about interventions designed to mitigate the effects of low health literacy. We performed an updated systematic review examining the effects of interventions that authors reported were specifically designed to mitigate the effects of low health literacy. We searched MEDLINE®, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), and the Cochrane Library databases (2003 forward for health literacy; 1966 forward for numeracy). Two reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for inclusion and included studies that examined outcomes by health literacy level and met other pre-specified criteria. One reviewer abstracted article information into evidence tables; a second checked accuracy. Two reviewers independently rated study quality using predefined criteria. Among 38 included studies, we found multiple discrete design features that improved comprehension in one or a few studies (e.g., presenting essential information by itself or first, presenting information so that the higher number is better, adding icon arrays to numerical information, adding video to verbal narratives). In a few studies, we also found consistent, direct, fair or good-quality evidence that intensive self-management interventions reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations; and intensive self- and disease-management interventions reduced disease severity. Evidence for the effects of interventions on other outcomes was either limited or mixed. Multiple interventions show promise for mitigating the effects of low health literacy and could be considered for use in clinical practice.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Physician overestimation of patient literacy: a potential source of health care disparities.

              To investigate physician overestimation of patient literacy level in a primary care setting. The study sample consisted of 12 non-academic primary care physicians and 100 patients from a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Hospital in Houston, Texas. Patient literacy level was measured on a 1-4 scale using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM). Physicians rated each patient's literacy level on a corresponding scale. Chi-square was used to test for association of patient race/ethnicity and gender with: (1) patient REALM level and (2) discrepancy between patient REALM level and physician rating of patient literacy level. Patient REALM level was not statistically significantly associated with patient race/ethnicity or gender. Physicians overestimated the REALM level for 54% of African American, 11% of white non-Hispanic, and 36% of other race/ethnicity patients (p<.01). Physicians commonly overestimate patients' literacy levels, and this apparently occurs more often with minority patients, and particularly with African Americans, than with white non-Hispanic patients. This discordance in estimation of patient's literacy level may be a source of disparities in health care.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Health Commun
                J Health Commun
                uhcm
                Journal of Health Communication
                Taylor & Francis
                1081-0730
                1087-0415
                4 October 2013
                December 2013
                : 18
                : Suppl 1
                : 82-102
                Affiliations
                Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
                Center for Health Policy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
                American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
                Author notes

                The authors thank Arthur Culbert, Ph.D., for his support and encouragement in this project. This work was sup ported in part by National Cancer Institute grants number 5K07 CA121457-05 and 3K07 CA121457 04S2 (Behavioral and Social Sci ences as Core Elements of the Medical School Curriculum) and Health Resources and Ser vices Administration grant number 1D58 HP15234 01-00 (Curriculum Activities for Learning Mood Disorders and Community Approaches to Residency Education [CALM CARE]).

                Address correspondence to Clifford A. Coleman, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA. E-mail: colemanc@ 123456ohsu.edu
                Article
                10.1080/10810730.2013.829538
                3814998
                24093348
                470eeb88-bc6e-453b-aefb-3b4152e408e0
                © Clifford A. Coleman, Stan Hudson, and Lucinda L. Maine

                This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Research Article

                Communication & Media studies
                Communication & Media studies

                Comments

                Comment on this article