33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Educational video-assisted versus conventional informed consent for trauma-related debridement surgery: a parallel group randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We investigated whether, in the emergency department (ED), educational video-assisted informed consent is superior to the conventional consent process, to inform trauma patients undergoing surgery about the procedure, benefits, risks, alternatives, and postoperative care.

          Methods

          We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial, with superiority study design. All trauma patients scheduled to receive trauma-related debridement surgery in the ED of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital were included. Patients were assigned to one of two education protocols. Participants in the intervention group watched an educational video illustrating informed consent information, whereas those in the control group read an informed consent document. The primary outcome was knowledge scores and the secondary outcome was assessment of patient satisfaction. A multivariable regression model, with predefined covariates, was used to analyze differences in knowledge scores and patient satisfaction levels between the groups.

          Results

          A total of 142 patients were enrolled, with 70 and 72 assigned to the intervention and control groups, respectively. Mean knowledge scores were higher in the intervention (72.57 ± 16.21 (SD)) than in the control (61.67 ± 18.39) group. By multivariate analysis, the intervention group had significantly greater differences in knowledge scores (coefficient: 7.646, 95% CI: 3.381–11.911). Age, injury severity score, and baseline knowledge score significantly affected the differences in knowledge scores. Significant improvements were observed in patients’ perception of statements addressing comprehension of the information provided, helpfulness of the supplied information for decision making, and satisfaction with the informed consent process. Multivariate analysis showed significant correlations between video education and patient satisfaction.

          Conclusions

          Both the educational approach and severity of injury may have an impact on patient understanding during the informed consent process in an emergency environment. Video-assisted informed consent may improve the understanding of surgery and satisfaction with the informed consent process for trauma patients in the ED. Institutions should develop structured methods and other strategies to better inform trauma patients, facilitate treatment decisions, and improve patient satisfaction.

          Trial registration

          The ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier is NCT01338480. The date of registration was April 18, 2011 (retrospectively registered).

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-018-0264-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent.

          The author summarizes emerging standards for informed consent as the underpinning of ethical research in humans.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making.

            Ours is an era in which patients seek greater engagement in health care choices, increasing the demand for high-quality information about clinical options. Providing support for informed choice is not straightforward, however, because of challenges faced by clinicians, health systems, and consumers. Greater use of written or electronic tools can help to clarify choices for patients, but decision aids cannot replace the human element in facilitating informed choice. The ideal solution is to couple information with high-quality decision counseling to help patients understand the potential risks, benefits, and uncertainties of clinical options and to assist them in selecting the option that best accommodates their personal preferences. Decision counseling can be offered by 3 types of providers: clinicians who lack formal informed-choice training ("usual care"), clinicians with formal informed-choice training, or trained third parties who function as impartial decision counselors. Controlled studies are needed to determine which model is best, but none appears to be ideal. The health care system cannot truly support informed decision making without correcting the underlying obstacles that impede patient access to needed information. New information technology solutions, training programs, and reimbursement schemes are necessary. Patient demand for guidance will only increase as clinical options multiply and the world of information continues its rapid growth. Today's health care system is unprepared for the convergence of these 2 burgeoning domains, and the need to address systemic deficiencies will grow more urgent over time.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effect of detailed, video-assisted anesthesia risk education on patient anxiety and the duration of the preanesthetic interview: a randomized controlled trial.

              Video-assisted patient education during the preanesthetic clinic visit is a new intervention to increase knowledge transfer to the patient regarding anesthesia procedure and risks. However, little is known about whether video-based patient education influences patient anxiety and the duration of the preanesthetic visit. Two hundred nine consecutive patients, who visited the anesthesia clinic before major operations, were randomly assigned to one of three groups: no-video (Group 1), video-before-interview (Group 2), and video-after-interview (Group 3). Anxiety levels were measured before and after the interview using the state trait anxiety inventory and a visual analog scale (anxiety). Patient knowledge regarding anesthesia technique, anesthesia-related risks, and patient satisfaction were assessed after the interview using standardized questionnaires. There were no significant differences in anxiety levels and patient satisfaction among the three groups. Patient knowledge was significantly higher in the video groups compared with the no-video group. The duration of the preanesthetic interview was significantly extended in Group 2 (video-before) (23.1 +/- 14.0 min), compared with Group 1 (no-video) (17.6 +/- 7.2 min), and Group 3 (video-after) (18.3 +/- 9.6 min). This difference was even more profound in subgroups of patients scheduled for anesthesia techniques with invasive monitoring. Our study suggests that the use of a video for detailed anesthesia risk education does not change patient anxiety, but leads to a better understanding of the procedure and risks of anesthesia. When the video is shown before the preanesthetic interview, the interview is longer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                yenko@ms16.hinet.net
                ytljwc@yahoo.com.tw
                doctor.tezu@gmail.com
                kmuh960090@gmail.com
                cybersphinx@msn.com
                +886-7-3121101 ext. 2633 , chiaju@kmu.edu.tw
                lshi2@jhu.edu
                d740113@cc.kmu.edu.tw
                lckaku@yahoo.com.tw
                Journal
                BMC Med Ethics
                BMC Med Ethics
                BMC Medical Ethics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6939
                9 March 2018
                9 March 2018
                2018
                : 19
                : 23
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9476 5696, GRID grid.412019.f, Department of Medical Humanities and Education, College of Medicine, , Kaohsiung Medical University, ; Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9476 5696, GRID grid.412019.f, Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, , Kaohsiung Medical University, ; Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9476 5696, GRID grid.412019.f, College of Nursing, , Kaohsiung Medical University, ; Kaohsiung, 807 Taiwan
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, GRID grid.21107.35, Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, , Johns Hopkins University, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                [6 ]Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9476 5696, GRID grid.412019.f, Department of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, , Kaohsiung Medical University, ; Kaohsiung, Taiwan
                Article
                264
                10.1186/s12910-018-0264-7
                5845218
                29523129
                4712b7f5-1fef-47db-9ab4-ab5d0690b590
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 5 August 2016
                : 5 March 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001868, National Science Council;
                Award ID: NSC 98-2410-H-037-009
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital
                Award ID: KMUH-98-P25
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Medicine
                informed consent,trauma,patient knowledge,patient satisfaction,emergency department
                Medicine
                informed consent, trauma, patient knowledge, patient satisfaction, emergency department

                Comments

                Comment on this article