57
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Application of change point analysis to daily influenza-like illness emergency department visits

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The utility of healthcare utilization data from US emergency departments (EDs) for rapid monitoring of changes in influenza-like illness (ILI) activity was highlighted during the recent influenza A (H1N1) pandemic. Monitoring has tended to rely on detection algorithms, such as the Early Aberration Reporting System (EARS), which are limited in their ability to detect subtle changes and identify disease trends.

          Objective

          To evaluate a complementary approach, change point analysis (CPA), for detecting changes in the incidence of ED visits due to ILI.

          Methodology and principal findings

          Data collected through the Distribute project ( isdsdistribute.org), which aggregates data on ED visits for ILI from over 50 syndromic surveillance systems operated by state or local public health departments were used. The performance was compared of the cumulative sum (CUSUM) CPA method in combination with EARS and the performance of three CPA methods (CUSUM, structural change model and Bayesian) in detecting change points in daily time-series data from four contiguous US states participating in the Distribute network. Simulation data were generated to assess the impact of autocorrelation inherent in these time-series data on CPA performance. The CUSUM CPA method was robust in detecting change points with respect to autocorrelation in time-series data (coverage rates at 90% when −0.2≤ρ≤0.2 and 80% when −0.5≤ρ≤0.5). During the 2008–9 season, 21 change points were detected and ILI trends increased significantly after 12 of these change points and decreased nine times. In the 2009–10 flu season, we detected 11 change points and ILI trends increased significantly after two of these change points and decreased nine times. Using CPA combined with EARS to analyze automatically daily ED-based ILI data, a significant increase was detected of 3% in ILI on April 27, 2009, followed by multiple anomalies in the ensuing days, suggesting the onset of the H1N1 pandemic in the four contiguous states.

          Conclusions and significance

          As a complementary approach to EARS and other aberration detection methods, the CPA method can be used as a tool to detect subtle changes in time-series data more effectively and determine the moving direction (ie, up, down, or stable) in ILI trends between change points. The combined use of EARS and CPA might greatly improve the accuracy of outbreak detection in syndromic surveillance systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Implementing syndromic surveillance: a practical guide informed by the early experience.

          Syndromic surveillance refers to methods relying on detection of individual and population health indicators that are discernible before confirmed diagnoses are made. In particular, prior to the laboratory confirmation of an infectious disease, ill persons may exhibit behavioral patterns, symptoms, signs, or laboratory findings that can be tracked through a variety of data sources. Syndromic surveillance systems are being developed locally, regionally, and nationally. The efforts have been largely directed at facilitating the early detection of a covert bioterrorist attack, but the technology may also be useful for general public health, clinical medicine, quality improvement, patient safety, and research. This report, authored by developers and methodologists involved in the design and deployment of the first wave of syndromic surveillance systems, is intended to serve as a guide for informaticians, public health managers, and practitioners who are currently planning deployment of such systems in their regions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The bioterrorism preparedness and response Early Aberration Reporting System (EARS).

            Data from public health surveillance systems can provide meaningful measures of population risks for disease, disability, and death. Analysis and evaluation of these surveillance data help public health practitioners react to important health events in a timely manner both locally and nationally. Aberration detection methods allow the rapid assessment of changes in frequencies and rates of different health outcomes and the characterization of unusual trends or clusters. The Early Aberration Reporting System (EARS) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention allows the analysis of public health surveillance data using available aberration detection methods. The primary purpose of EARS is to provide national, state, and local health departments with several alternative aberration detection methods. EARS helps assist local and state health officials to focus limited resources on appropriate activities during epidemiological investigations of important public health events. Finally, EARS allows end users to select validated aberration detection methods and modify sensitivity and specificity thresholds to values considered to be of public health importance by local and state health departments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Outbreak detection through automated surveillance: a review of the determinants of detection.

              Public health agencies and other groups have invested considerable resources in automated surveillance systems over the last decade. These systems generally follow syndromes in pre-diagnostic data drawn from sources such as emergency department visits. A main goal of syndromic surveillance systems is to detect outbreaks rapidly and the number of studies evaluating outbreak detection has increased recently. This paper reviews these studies with the goal of identifying the determinants of outbreak detection in automated syndromic surveillance systems. The review identified 35 studies with 22 studies (63%) relying on naturally occurring outbreaks and 13 studies (37%) relying on simulated outbreaks. In general, the results from these studies suggest that syndromic surveillance systems are capable of detecting some types of disease outbreaks rapidly with high sensitivity. The determinants of detection included characteristics of the system and of the outbreak. Influential system characteristics included representativeness, the outbreak detection algorithm, and the specificity of the algorithm. Important outbreak characteristics included the magnitude and shape of the signal and the timing of the outbreak. Future evaluations should aim to address inconsistencies in the evidence noted in this review and to identify the potential influence of other factors on outbreak detection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Am Med Inform Assoc
                J Am Med Inform Assoc
                jamia
                amiajnl
                Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
                BMJ Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                1067-5027
                1527-974X
                Nov-Dec 2012
                : 19
                : 6
                : 1075-1081
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Public Health Surveillance and Informatics Program Office, Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, & Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [2 ]Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
                [3 ]McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [4 ]International Society for Disease Surveillance, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [5 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [6 ]Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal, Direction de santé publique, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [7 ]Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [8 ]National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Office of Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Taha A Kass-Hout, Public Health Surveillance and Informatics Program Office, Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, & Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; kasshout@ 123456gmail.com

                All authors revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the version submitted for review. This article is original work, not currently under review elsewhere and no part of this article has previously been published.

                Article
                amiajnl-2011-000793
                10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000793
                3534458
                22759619
                471b29eb-b4e9-4699-8278-94aa82aea335
                Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

                History
                : 21 December 2011
                : 15 May 2012
                Categories
                Research and Applications
                1506

                Bioinformatics & Computational biology
                outbreaks,simulation of complex systems (at all levels: molecules to work groups to organizations),algorithm,detecting disease outbreaks and biological threats,change point analysis,disease,monitoring the health of populations,public health,surveillance

                Comments

                Comment on this article