10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Sex Recognition through Midflight Mating Duets in Culex Mosquitoes Is Mediated by Acoustic Distortion

      , ,
      Current Biology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sexual recognition through wing-beat frequency matching was first demonstrated in Toxorhynchites brevipalpis, where wing-beat frequencies of males and females are similar. Here we show frequency matching in Culex quinquefasciatus, where the wing-beat frequencies of males and females differ considerably. The wing-beat frequencies converge not on the fundamental but on the nearest shared harmonic (usually female's third and male's second). Frequencies in this range are, however, too high to elicit phasic sensory-neural responses from the Johnston's organ (JO) or to drive the mosquito's motor neurons. Potential cues for frequency matching are difference tones produced by nonlinear mixing of male and female flight tones in the vibrations of the mosquito's antennae. Receptor potentials and neural-motor activity were recorded in response to difference tones produced when a mosquito was stimulated simultaneously by two tones at frequencies outside the phasic response range of the JO but within range of the antennal vibrations. We demonstrate sexual recognition through matching of flight-tone harmonics in Culex mosquitoes and suggest that difference tones are used as an error signal for frequency matching beyond the frequency range of the JO's sensory-neural range. This is the first report of acoustic distortion being exploited as a sensory cue, rather than existing as an epiphenomenon.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Current Biology
          Current Biology
          Elsevier BV
          09609822
          March 2009
          March 2009
          : 19
          : 6
          : 485-491
          Article
          10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.059
          19269180
          4738fd04-7358-43bd-9a18-94d244b59726
          © 2009

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article