64
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A regulatory focus perspective on eating behavior: how prevention and promotion focus relates to emotional, external, and restrained eating

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          By applying regulatory focus theory (RFT) to the context of eating behavior, the present research examines the relations between individual differences in the two motivational orientations as conceptualized in RFT, that is, prevention-focused and promotion-focused self-regulation and emotional, external, and restrained eating. Building on a representative study conducted in the Netherlands ( N = 4,230), it is documented that individual differences in prevention focus are positively related to emotional eating whereas negligible associations are found in regards to external and restrained eating. Individual differences in promotion focus are positively related to external eating whereas negligible associations are found in regards to emotional and restrained eating. In relating RFT to different eating styles we were able to document significant relations of basic self-regulatory orientations with regard to essential daily behavior associated with health and well-being. The implications for changing eating styles are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity.

          This study tested whether cues associated with promotion and prevention regulatory foci influence creativity. The authors predicted that the "risky," explorative processing style elicited by promotion cues, relative to the risk-averse, perseverant processing style elicited by prevention cues, would facilitate creative thought. These predictions were supported by two experiments in which promotion cues bolstered both creative insight (Experiment 1) and creative generation (Experiment 2) relative to prevention cues. Experiments 3 and 4 provided evidence for the process account of these findings. suggesting that promotion cues, relative to prevention cues, produce a riskier response bias (Experiment 3) and bolster memory search for novel responses (Experiment 4). A final experiment provided evidence that individual differences in regulatory focus influence creative problem solving in a manner analogous to that of incidental promotion and prevention cues.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Emotional Eating Scale: the development of a measure to assess coping with negative affect by eating.

            The development of the Emotional Eating Scale (EES) is described. The factor solution replicated the scale's construction, revealing Anger/Frustration, Anxiety, and Depression subscales. All three subscales correlated highly with measures of binge eating, providing evidence of construct validity. None of the EES subscales correlated significantly with general measures of psychopathology. With few exceptions, changes in EES subscales correlated with treatment-related changes in binge eating. In support of the measure's discriminant efficiency, when compared with obese binge eaters, subscale scores of a sample of anxiety-disordered patients were significantly lower. Lack of correlation between a measure of cognitive restraint and EES subscales suggests that emotional eating may precipitate binge episodes among the obese independent of the level of restraint.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: regulatory focus and the "goal looms larger" effect.

              Three studies tested the hypothesis that regulatory focus, both as a chronic person variable and as a manipulated situational variable, differentially affects the strength of participants' approach and avoidance strategic motivations as they get closer to the goal. In 2 studies, flexion and extension arm pressure were used as on-line measures of approach and avoidance intensity, respectively. As predicted, the approach gradient was steeper for participants with a promotion focus on aspirations and gains than for participants with a prevention focus on responsibilities and nonlosses, whereas the reverse was true for the avoidance gradient. In a third study, the same pattern of results was found on a persistence measure of motivational strength. Participants with a promotion focus worked longer on anagrams closer to the goal when they were approach means for goal attainment than when they were avoidance means, whereas the reverse was true for participants with a prevention focus.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                20 November 2014
                2014
                : 5
                : 1314
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University Ulm, Germany
                [2] 2Knowledge Media Research Center Tübingen, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Boris C. Rodríguez-Martín, Central University “Marta Abreu” of Las Villas, Cuba

                Reviewed by: Floor Kroese, Utrecht University, Netherlands; Tracy Cheung, Utrecht University, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Stefan Pfattheicher, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Abteilung Sozialpsychologie, 89069 Ulm, Germany e-mail: stefan.pfattheicher@ 123456uni-ulm.de

                This article was submitted to Eating Behavior, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01314
                4238324
                25477840
                475e92fd-26bb-42d8-9d48-d1785cf8acc8
                Copyright © 2014 Pfattheicher and Sassenrath.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 05 September 2014
                : 29 October 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 62, Pages: 8, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                eating behavior,emotional eating,external eating,prevention focus,promotion focus,regulatory focus,restrained eating

                Comments

                Comment on this article