26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lactobacillus plantarum producing a Chlamydia trachomatis antigen induces a specific IgA response after mucosal booster immunization

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mucosal immunity is important for the protection against a wide variety of pathogens. Traditional vaccines administered via parenteral routes induce strong systemic immunity, but they often fail to generate mucosal IgA. In contrast, bacteria-based vaccines comprise an appealing strategy for antigen delivery to mucosal sites. Vaginal infection with Chlamydia trachomatis can develop into upper genital tract infections that can lead to infertility. Therefore, the development of an effective vaccine against Chlamydia is a high priority. In the present study, we have explored the use of a common lactic acid bacterium, Lactobacillus plantarum, as a vector for delivery of a C. trachomatis antigen to mucosal sites. The antigen, referred as Hirep2 (H2), was anchored to the surface of L. plantarum cells using an N-terminal lipoprotein anchor. After characterization, the constructed strain was used as an immunogenic agent in mice. We explored a heterologous prime-boost strategy, consisting of subcutaneous priming with soluble H2 antigen co-administered with CAF01 adjuvant, followed by an intranasal boost with H2-displaying L. plantarum. The results show that, when used as a booster, the recombinant L. plantarum strain was able to evoke cellular responses. Most importantly, booster immunization with the Lactobacillus-based vaccine induced generation of antigen-specific IgA in the vaginal cavity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1.

          The 3,308,274-bp sequence of the chromosome of Lactobacillus plantarum strain WCFS1, a single colony isolate of strain NCIMB8826 that was originally isolated from human saliva, has been determined, and contains 3,052 predicted protein-encoding genes. Putative biological functions could be assigned to 2,120 (70%) of the predicted proteins. Consistent with the classification of L. plantarum as a facultative heterofermentative lactic acid bacterium, the genome encodes all enzymes required for the glycolysis and phosphoketolase pathways, all of which appear to belong to the class of potentially highly expressed genes in this organism, as was evident from the codon-adaptation index of individual genes. Moreover, L. plantarum encodes a large pyruvate-dissipating potential, leading to various end-products of fermentation. L. plantarum is a species that is encountered in many different environmental niches, and this flexible and adaptive behavior is reflected by the relatively large number of regulatory and transport functions, including 25 complete PTS sugar transport systems. Moreover, the chromosome encodes >200 extracellular proteins, many of which are predicted to be bound to the cell envelope. A large proportion of the genes encoding sugar transport and utilization, as well as genes encoding extracellular functions, appear to be clustered in a 600-kb region near the origin of replication. Many of these genes display deviation of nucleotide composition, consistent with a foreign origin. These findings suggest that these genes, which provide an important part of the interaction of L. plantarum with its environment, form a lifestyle adaptation region in the chromosome.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Immunomodulatory mechanisms of lactobacilli

            Abstract Over the past decade it has become clear that lactobacilli and other probiotic and commensal organisms can interact with mucosal immune cells or epithelial cells lining the mucosa to modulate specific functions of the mucosal immune system. The most well understood signalling mechanisms involve the innate pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors, nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptors and C-type lectin receptors. Binding of microbe-associated molecular patterns with these receptors can activate antigen presenting cells and modulate their function through the expression of surface receptors, secreted cytokines and chemokines. In vitro the cytokine response of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and dendritic cells to lactobacilli can be strikingly different depending on both the bacterial species and the strain. Several factors have been identified in lactobacilli that influence the immune response in vitro and in vivo including cell surface carbohydrates, enzymes modifying the structure of lipoteichoic acids and metabolites. In mice mechanistic studies point to a role for the homeostatic control of inducible T regulatory cells in the mucosal tissues as one possible immunomodulatory mechanism. Increasing evidence also suggests that induction of epithelial signalling by intestinal lactobacilli can modulate barrier functions, defensin production and regulate inflammatory signalling. Other probiotic mechanisms include modulation of the T cell effector subsets, enhancement of humoral immunity and interactions with the epithelial-associated dendritic cells and macrophages. A major challenge for the future will be to gain more knowledge about the interactions occurring between lactobacilli and the host in vivo and to understand the molecular basis of innate signalling in response to whole bacteria which trigger multiple signalling pathways.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lactobacilli differentially modulate expression of cytokines and maturation surface markers in murine dendritic cells.

              Dendritic cells (DC) play a pivotal immunoregulatory role in the Th1, Th2, and Th3 cell balance and are present throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, DC may be targets for modulation by gut microbes, including ingested probiotics. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that species of Lactobacillus, important members of the gut flora, differentially activate DC. Bone marrow-derived murine DC were exposed to various lethally irradiated Lactobacillus spp. and resultant culture supernatants were analyzed for IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, and TNF-alpha. Substantial differences were found among strains in the capacity to induce IL-12 and TNF-alpha production in the DC. Similar but less pronounced differences were observed among lactobacilli in the induction of IL-6 and IL-10. Although all strains up-regulated surface MHC class II and B7-2 (CD86), which is indicative of DC maturation, those lactobacilli with greatest capacity to induce IL-12 were most effective. Remarkably, Lactobacillus reuteri DSM12246, a poor IL-12 inducer, inhibited IL-12, IL-6, and TNF-alpha induction by the otherwise strong cytokine inducer L. casei CHCC3139, while IL-10 production remained unaltered. In analogous fashion, L. reuteri reduced L. casei-induced up-regulation of B7-2. These results suggest that different species of Lactobacillus exert very different DC activation patterns and, furthermore, at least one species may be capable of inhibiting activities of other species in the genus. Thus, the potential exists for Th1/Th2/Th3-driving capacities of the gut DC to be modulated according to composition of gut microflora, including ingested probiotics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                3 May 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 5
                : e0176401
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), 1432 Ås, Norway
                [2 ]Statens Serum Institut, Department of Infectious Disease Immunology, Copenhagen, Denmark
                University of California, San Francisco, Universit of California, Berkeley and the Childrens Hospital Oakland Research Institute, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: JD FF GM VE KK.

                • Formal analysis: KK JD.

                • Funding acquisition: VE JD FF.

                • Investigation: IM KK LØ.

                • Project administration: VE KK JD FF GM.

                • Supervision: JD GM VE.

                • Validation: KK JD.

                • Writing – original draft: KK.

                • Writing – review & editing: JD FF GM VE.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2916-1521
                Article
                PONE-D-16-45379
                10.1371/journal.pone.0176401
                5415134
                28467432
                476b2ba0-1796-4efd-8ced-3cc3483ed10a
                © 2017 Kuczkowska et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 November 2016
                : 9 April 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 2, Pages: 16
                Funding
                This work was funded by a PhD fellowship from the Norwegian University of Life Sciences and the Globvac program of the Research Council of Norway ( http://www.forskningsradet.no/en/Home_page/1177315753906), through grant number 234502. This study was supported partly by the Danish Council for Independent Research Medical Sciences [Grant no.: DFF-4004-00424] ( http://ufm.dk/en/research-and-innovation/councils-and-commissions/the-danish-council-for-independent-research) and The Danish National Advanced Technology Foundation [069-2011-1] ( http://ufm.dk/en/research-and-innovation/councils-and-commissions/the-danish-council-for-independent-research). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Infectious Disease Control
                Vaccines
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Microbiology
                Medical Microbiology
                Microbial Pathogens
                Bacterial Pathogens
                Chlamydia Trachomatis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Pathogens
                Microbial Pathogens
                Bacterial Pathogens
                Chlamydia Trachomatis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Bacteria
                Chlamydia
                Chlamydia Trachomatis
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Infectious Diseases
                Infectious Disease Control
                Vaccines
                Booster Doses
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Immunologic Techniques
                Immunoassays
                Enzyme-Linked Immunoassays
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Immune Response
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Immune Response
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physiology
                Immune Physiology
                Antibodies
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Physiology
                Immune Physiology
                Antibodies
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Immune System Proteins
                Antibodies
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Immune System Proteins
                Antibodies
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biochemistry
                Proteins
                Immune System Proteins
                Antibodies
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Preventive Medicine
                Vaccination and Immunization
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Immunology
                Immunity
                Mucosal Immunity
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Immunology
                Immunity
                Mucosal Immunity
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article