23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Spirometry in children

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Respiratory disorders are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality in children. Spirometry is a useful investigation for diagnosing and monitoring a variety of paediatric respiratory diseases, but it is underused by primary care physicians and paediatricians treating children with respiratory disease. We now have a better understanding of respiratory physiology in children, and newer computerised spirometry equipment is available with updated regional reference values for the paediatric age group. This review evaluates the current literature for indications, test procedures, quality assessment, and interpretation of spirometry results in children. Spirometry may be useful for asthma, cystic fibrosis, congenital or acquired airway malformations and many other respiratory diseases in children. The technique for performing spirometry in children is crucial and is discussed in detail. Most children, including preschool children, can perform acceptable spirometry. Steps for interpreting spirometry results include identification of common errors during the test by applying acceptability and repeatability criteria and then comparing test parameters with reference standards. Spirometry results depict only the pattern of ventilation, which may be normal, obstructive, restrictive, or mixed. The diagnosis should be based on both clinical features and spirometry results. There is a need to encourage primary care physicians and paediatricians treating respiratory diseases in children to use spirometry after adequate training.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of late preterm birth on longitudinal lung spirometry in school age children and adolescents.

          Rates of preterm birth have increased in most industrialised countries but data on later lung function of late preterm births are limited. A study was undertaken to compare lung function at 8-9 and 14-17 years in children born late preterm (33-34 and 35-36 weeks gestation) with children of similar age born at term (≥37 weeks gestation). Children born at 25-32 weeks gestation were also compared with children born at term. All births from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (n=14 049) who had lung spirometry at 8-9 years of age (n=6705) and/or 14-17 years of age (n=4508) were divided into four gestation groups. At 8-9 years of age, all spirometry measures were lower in the 33-34-week gestation group than in controls born at term but were similar to the spirometry decrements observed in the 25-32-week gestation group. The 35-36-week gestation group and term group had similar values. In the late preterm group, at 14-17 years of age forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were not significantly different from the term group but FEV(1)/FVC and forced expiratory flow at 25-75% FVC (FEF(25-75%)) remained significantly lower than term controls. Children requiring mechanical ventilation in infancy at 25-32 and 33-34 weeks gestation had in general lower airway function (FEV(1) and FEF(25-75)) at both ages than those not ventilated in infancy. Children born at 33-34 weeks gestation have significantly lower lung function values at 8-9 years of age, similar to decrements observed in the 25-32-week group, although some improvements were noted by 14-17 years of age.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Diagnostic spirometry in primary care: Proposed standards for general practice compliant with American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society recommendations: a General Practice Airways Group (GPIAG)1 document, in association with the Association for Respiratory Technology & Physiology (ARTP)2 and Education for Health3 1 www.gpiag.org 2 www.artp.org 3 www.educationforhealth.org.uk.

            Primary care spirometry services can be provided by trained primary care staff, peripatetic specialist services, or through referral to hospital-based or laboratory spirometry. The first of these options is the focus of this Standards Document. It aims to provide detailed information for clinicians, managers and healthcare commissioners on the key areas of quality required for diagnostic spirometry in primary care--including training requirements and quality assurance. These proposals and recommendations are designed to raise the standard of spirometry and respiratory diagnosis in primary care and to provide the impetus for debate, improvement and maintenance of quality for diagnostic (rather than screening) spirometry performed in primary care. This document should therefore challenge current performance and should constitute an aspirational guide for delivery of this service.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality control for spirometry in preschool children with and without lung disease.

              The reliability of spirometry is dependent on strict quality control. We examined whether quality control criteria recommended for adults could be applied to children aged 2-5 years. Forty-two children with cystic fibrosis and 37 healthy children attempted spirometry during their first visit to our laboratory. Whereas 59 children (75%) were able to produce a technically satisfactory forced expiration lasting 0.5 second, only 46 (58%) could produce an expiration lasting 1 second, with the youngest children having the most difficulty. Start of test criteria for adults were inappropriate for this age group, with only 16 of 59 children producing a volume of back extrapolation as a proportion of forced vital capacity of less than 5%, whereas all but 4 could produce a volume of back extrapolation of 80 ml or less. More than 90% of children were able to produce a second forced vital capacity and a second forced expired volume in 0.75 second within 10% of their highest. Errors in the spirometry software resulted in inaccurate reporting of expiratory duration and inappropriate timed expired volumes in some children. We describe recommendations for modified start of test and repeatability criteria for this age group, and for improvements in software to facilitate better quality control.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Prim Care Respir J
                Prim Care Respir J
                Primary Care Respiratory Journal: Journal of the General Practice Airways Group
                Nature Publishing Group
                1471-4418
                1475-1534
                June 2013
                29 May 2013
                : 22
                : 2
                : 221-229
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pediatrics, Government Medical College and Hospital , Sector-32, Chandigarh-160030, India
                Author notes
                [* ]Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Government Medical College and Hospital , Sector-32, Chandigarh-160030, India. Tel: +91-9872308656 Fax: +91-172-2608488 E-mail: drkanaram@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                pcrj201342
                10.4104/pcrj.2013.00042
                6442789
                23732636
                4791e1a8-9b7a-4119-836b-e48d04f5baf7
                Copyright © 2013 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK
                History
                : 15 December 2012
                : 08 February 2013
                : 17 February 2013
                Categories
                Clinical Review

                spirometry,preschool children,forced vital capacity,forced expiratory volume in one second

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log