40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
5 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine for the Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19 in Africa: Caution for Inappropriate Off-label Use in Healthcare Settings

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract.

          The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 pandemic has spread to Africa, where nearly all countries have reported laboratory-confirmed cases of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Although there are ongoing clinical trials of repurposed and investigational antiviral and immune-based therapies, there are as yet no scientifically proven, clinically effective pharmacological treatments for COVID-19. Among the repurposed drugs, the commonly used antimalarials chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have become the focus of global scientific, media, and political attention despite a lack of randomized clinical trials supporting their efficacy. Chloroquine has been used worldwide for about 75 years and is listed by the WHO as an essential medicine to treat malaria. Hydroxychloroquine is mainly used as a therapy for autoimmune diseases. However, the efficacy and safety of CQ/HCQ for the treatment of COVID-19 remains to be defined. Indiscriminate promotion and widespread use of CQ/HCQ have led to extensive shortages, self-treatment, and fatal overdoses. Shortages and increased market prices leave all countries vulnerable to substandard and falsified medical products, and safety issues are especially concerning for Africa because of its healthcare system limitations. Much needed in Africa is a cross-continental collaborative network for coordinated production, distribution, and post-marketing surveillance aligned to low-cost distribution of any approved COVID-19 drug; this would ideally be piggybacked on existing global aid efforts. Meanwhile, African countries should strongly consider implementing prescription monitoring schemes to ensure that any off-label CQ/HCQ use is appropriate and beneficial during this pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

          Summary Background Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described. Methods In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death. Findings 191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients). Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03–1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61–12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64–128·55; p=0·0033) on admission. Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0–24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors. The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days. Interpretation The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage. Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future. Funding Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial

            Background Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been found to be efficient on SARS-CoV-2, and reported to be efficient in Chinese COV-19 patients. We evaluate the role of hydroxychloroquine on respiratory viral loads. Patients and methods French Confirmed COVID-19 patients were included in a single arm protocol from early March to March 16th, to receive 600mg of hydroxychloroquine daily and their viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs was tested daily in a hospital setting. Depending on their clinical presentation, azithromycin was added to the treatment. Untreated patients from another center and cases refusing the protocol were included as negative controls. Presence and absence of virus at Day6-post inclusion was considered the end point. Results Six patients were asymptomatic, 22 had upper respiratory tract infection symptoms and eight had lower respiratory tract infection symptoms. Twenty cases were treated in this study and showed a significant reduction of the viral carriage at D6-post inclusion compared to controls, and much lower average carrying duration than reported of untreated patients in the literature. Azithromycin added to hydroxychloroquine was significantly more efficient for virus elimination. Conclusion Despite its small sample size our survey shows that hydroxychloroquine treatment is significantly associated with viral load reduction/disappearance in COVID-19 patients and its effect is reinforced by azithromycin.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a SARS-CoV-2 receptor: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic target

              A novel infectious disease, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was detected in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. The disease (COVID-19) spread rapidly, reaching epidemic proportions in China, and has been found in 27 other countries. As of February 27, 2020, over 82,000 cases of COVID-19 were reported, with > 2800 deaths. No specific therapeutics are available, and current management includes travel restrictions, patient isolation, and supportive medical care. There are a number of pharmaceuticals already being tested [1, 2], but a better understanding of the underlying pathobiology is required. In this context, this article will briefly review the rationale for angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor as a specific target. SARS-CoV-2 and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) use ACE2 receptor to facilitate viral entry into target cells SARS-CoV-2 has been sequenced [3]. A phylogenetic analysis [3, 4] found a bat origin for the SARS-CoV-2. There is a diversity of possible intermediate hosts for SARS-CoV-2, including pangolins, but not mice and rats [5]. There are many similarities of SARS-CoV-2 with the original SARS-CoV. Using computer modeling, Xu et al. [6] found that the spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV have almost identical 3-D structures in the receptor-binding domain that maintains van der Waals forces. SARS-CoV spike protein has a strong binding affinity to human ACE2, based on biochemical interaction studies and crystal structure analysis [7]. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV spike proteins share 76.5% identity in amino acid sequences [6] and, importantly, the SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV spike proteins have a high degree of homology [6, 7]. Wan et al. [4] reported that residue 394 (glutamine) in the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD), corresponding to residue 479 in SARS-CoV, can be recognized by the critical lysine 31 on the human ACE2 receptor [8]. Further analysis even suggested that SARS-CoV-2 recognizes human ACE2 more efficiently than SARS-CoV increasing the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to transmit from person to person [4]. Thus, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was predicted to also have a strong binding affinity to human ACE2. This similarity with SARS-CoV is critical because ACE2 is a functional SARS-CoV receptor in vitro [9] and in vivo [10]. It is required for host cell entry and subsequent viral replication. Overexpression of human ACE2 enhanced disease severity in a mouse model of SARS-CoV infection, demonstrating that viral entry into cells is a critical step [11]; injecting SARS-CoV spike into mice worsened lung injury. Critically, this injury was attenuated by blocking the renin-angiotensin pathway and depended on ACE2 expression [12]. Thus, for SARS-CoV pathogenesis, ACE2 is not only the entry receptor of the virus but also protects from lung injury. We therefore previously suggested that in contrast to most other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV became highly lethal because the virus deregulates a lung protective pathway [10, 12]. Zhou et al. [13] demonstrated that overexpressing ACE2 from different species in HeLa cells with human ACE2, pig ACE2, civet ACE2 (but not mouse ACE2) allowed SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication, thereby directly showing that SARS-CoV-2 uses ACE2 as a cellular entry receptor. They further demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 does not use other coronavirus receptors such as aminopeptidase N and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 [13]. In summary, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein directly binds with the host cell surface ACE2 receptor facilitating virus entry and replication. Enrichment distribution of ACE2 receptor in human alveolar epithelial cells (AEC) A key question is why the lung appears to be the most vulnerable target organ. One reason is that the vast surface area of the lung makes the lung highly susceptible to inhaled viruses, but there is also a biological factor. Using normal lung tissue from eight adult donors, Zhao et al. [14] demonstrated that 83% of ACE2-expressing cells were alveolar epithelial type II cells (AECII), suggesting that these cells can serve as a reservoir for viral invasion. In addition, gene ontology enrichment analysis showed that the ACE2-expressing AECII have high levels of multiple viral process-related genes, including regulatory genes for viral processes, viral life cycle, viral assembly, and viral genome replication [14], suggesting that the ACE2-expressing AECII facilitate coronaviral replication in the lung. Expression of the ACE2 receptor is also found in many extrapulmonary tissues including heart, kidney, endothelium, and intestine [15–19]. Importantly, ACE2 is highly expressed on the luminal surface of intestinal epithelial cells, functioning as a co-receptor for nutrient uptake, in particular for amino acid resorption from food [20]. We therefore predict that the intestine might also be a major entry site for SARS-CoV-2 and that the infection might have been initiated by eating food from the Wuhan market, the putative site of the outbreak. Whether SARS-CoV-2 can indeed infect the human gut epithelium has important implications for fecal–oral transmission and containment of viral spread. ACE2 tissue distribution in other organs could explain the multi-organ dysfunction observed in patients [21–23]. Of note, however, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [24], whether a person can get COVID-19 by touching surfaces or objects that have virus on them and then touching mucus membranes is yet to be confirmed. Potential approaches to address ACE2-mediated COVID-19 There are several potential therapeutic approaches (Fig. 1). Spike protein-based vaccine. Development of a spike1 subunit protein-based vaccine may rely on the fact that ACE2 is the SARS-CoV-2 receptor. Cell lines that facilitate viral replication in the presence of ACE2 may be most efficient in large-scale vaccine production. Inhibition of transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) activity. Hoffman et al. [25] recently demonstrated that initial spike protein priming by transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) is essential for entry and viral spread of SARS-CoV-2 through interaction with the ACE2 receptor [26, 27]. The serine protease inhibitor camostat mesylate, approved in Japan to treat unrelated diseases, has been shown to block TMPRSS2 activity [28, 29] and is thus an interesting candidate. Blocking ACE2 receptor. The interaction sites between ACE2 and SARS-CoV have been identified at the atomic level and from studies to date should also hold true for interactions between ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2. Thus, one could target this interaction site with antibodies or small molecules. Delivering excessive soluble form of ACE2. Kuba et al. [10] demonstrated in mice that SARS-CoV downregulates ACE2 protein (but not ACE) by binding its spike protein, contributing to severe lung injury. This suggests that excessive ACE2 may competitively bind with SARS-CoV-2 not only to neutralize the virus but also rescue cellular ACE2 activity which negatively regulates the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) to protect the lung from injury [12, 30]. Indeed, enhanced ACE activity and decreased ACE2 availability contribute to lung injury during acid- and ventilator-induced lung injury [12, 31, 32]. Thus, treatment with a soluble form of ACE2 itself may exert dual functions: (1) slow viral entry into cells and hence viral spread [7, 9] and (2) protect the lung from injury [10, 12, 31, 32]. Notably, a recombinant human ACE2 (rhACE2; APN01, GSK2586881) has been found to be safe, with no negative hemodynamic effects in healthy volunteers and in a small cohort of patients with ARDS [33–35]. The administration of APN01 rapidly decreased levels of its proteolytic target peptide angiotensin II, with a trend to lower plasma IL-6 concentrations. Our previous work on SARS-CoV pathogenesis makes ACE2 a rational and scientifically validated therapeutic target for the current COVID-19 pandemic. The availability of recombinant ACE2 was the impetus to assemble a multinational team of intensivists, scientists, and biotech to rapidly initiate a pilot trial of rhACE2 in patients with severe COVID-19 (Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT04287686). Fig. 1 Potential approaches to address ACE2-mediated COVID-19 following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The finding that SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV use the ACE2 receptor for cell entry has important implications for understanding SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility and pathogenesis. SARS-CoV and likely SARS-CoV-2 lead to downregulation of the ACE2 receptor, but not ACE, through binding of the spike protein with ACE2. This leads to viral entry and replication, as well as severe lung injury. Potential therapeutic approaches include a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-based vaccine; a transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) inhibitor to block the priming of the spike protein; blocking the surface ACE2 receptor by using anti-ACE2 antibody or peptides; and a soluble form of ACE2 which should slow viral entry into cells through competitively binding with SARS-CoV-2 and hence decrease viral spread as well as protecting the lung from injury through its unique enzymatic function. MasR—mitochondrial assembly receptor, AT1R—Ang II type 1 receptor
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Am J Trop Med Hyg
                Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg
                tpmd
                tropmed
                The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
                The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
                0002-9637
                1476-1645
                June 2020
                22 April 2020
                22 April 2020
                : 102
                : 6
                : 1184-1188
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Infectious Diseases Outpatient Clinic, Cameroon and Infectious Diseases Society of Cameroon, Yaoundé, Douala, Cameroon;
                [2 ]Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa;
                [3 ]Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium;
                [4 ]Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa;
                [5 ]Department of Nursing, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria;
                [6 ]Institute of Human Virology and Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;
                [7 ]International Research Center of Excellence, Institute of Human Virology Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria;
                [8 ]Department of Paediatrics, University of Cape Coast School of Medical Sciences, Cape Coast, Ghana;
                [9 ]Department of Medical Microbiology and Virology, National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo;
                [10 ]Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Fann, Université Cheik Anta-Diop, Dakar, Sénégal;
                [11 ]Unit of Infectious Diseases, Treichville University Teaching Hospital, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire;
                [12 ]Unité de Dermatologie et Infectiologie, Unité de Formation et de Recherche, Université Félix Houphouet Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire;
                [13 ]University of Kigali School of Public Health, Kigali, Rwanda;
                [14 ]Erasme Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium;
                [15 ]Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, Centre for Clinical Microbiology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [16 ]National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
                [17 ]Center for Infectious Diseases, at Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa;
                [18 ]Department of International Health and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland;
                [19 ]University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health and Center for Global Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
                Author notes
                [* ]Address correspondence to Jean B. Nachega, Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Department of Epidemiology and Center for Global Health, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, 130 DeSoto St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15261. E-mail: jbn16@ 123456pitt.edu

                Disclosure: Nachega is an infectious disease internist and epidemiologist supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grant number 5U01AI069521 (Stellenbosch University Clinical Trial Unit (CTU) of AIDS Clinical Trial Group [ACTG]) as well as NIH/Fogarty International Center (FIC) grant numbers 1R25TW011217-01 (African Association for Health Professions Education and Research) and 1D43TW010937-01A1 (the University of Pittsburgh HIV-Comorbidities Research Training Program in South Africa). He serves on the scientific program committee of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH) and is a senior fellow alumni of the European Developing Countries Clinical Trial Partnership (EDCTP). Muyembe-Tamfum has been on the front lines of Ebola research since 1970s, identifying nosocomial and burial transmission as two of the major causes of disease transmission, contributing to vaccine research, developing antisera therapy, and training a new generation of disease responders and Congolese laboratory. He is now leading the COVID-19 Task Force Response in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Sir Zumla is a co-PI of the Pan-African Network on Emerging and Re-Emerging Infections (PANDORA-ID-NET— https://www.pandora-id.net/) funded by the EDCTP, the EU Horizon 2020 Framework Program for Research and Innovation. Sir Zumla is in receipt of a National Institutes of Health Research senior investigator award. Seydi is an infectious diseases and tropical medicine expert and member of the COVID-19 Task Force Response in Senegal. Suleman is a Public Health Pharmacist supported by a NIH/Fogarty International Center (FIC) grant number 1R25TW011217-01 (African Association for Health Professions Education and Research). Dr. Sam-Agudu is a Pediatric Infectious Diseases clinician-scientist supported by the NIH/National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) grant R01HD089866, and by an NIH/FIC award under the Adolescent HIV Prevention and Treatment Implementation Science Alliance (AHISA), for the Central and West Africa Implementation Science Alliance (CAWISA). Prisca Olabisi Adejumo is a professor of Medical Surgical Nursing, a nurse educator supported by NIH/Fogarty International Center (FIC) grant number 1R25TW011217-01 (African Association for Health Professions Education and Research). All authors have an interest in emerging and reemerging pathogens and declare no conflicts of interest.

                Authors’ addresses: Pascale M. Abena, Infectious Diseases Outpatient Clinic, Douala, Cameroon, E-mail: abenamessomo@ 123456yahoo.fr . Eric H. Decloedt, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa, E-mail: ericdecloedt@ 123456sun.ac.za . Emmanuel Bottieau, Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium, E-mail: ebottieau@ 123456itg.be . Fatima Suleman, Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa, E-mail: sulemanf@ 123456ukzn.ac.za . Nadia A. Sam-Agudu, Institute of Human Virology Nigeria, International Research Center of ExcellenceAbuja, Nigeria, Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Institute of Human Virology, Baltimore, MD, and Department of Paediatrics, University of Cape Coast School of Medical Sciences, Cape Coast, Ghana, E-mail: nsamagudu@ 123456ihvnigeria.org . Jean-Jacques Muyembe TamFum, Department of Virology, National Instute of Bio-Medical Research (INRB), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Universite de Kinshasa, Microbiologie et Virologie Medicale, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, E-mail: jjmuyembet@ 123456gmail.com . Moussa Seydi, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Fann, Université Cheik Anta-Diop, Dakar, Sénégal, E-mail: seydi.moussa@ 123456gmail.com . Serge P. Eholie, Programme PAC-CI, N/A, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, E-mail: sergeholie@ 123456yahoo.fr . Edward J. Mills, School of Public Health, University of Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda, E-mail: emills@ 123456mteksciences.com . Oscar Kallay, Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University Clinics, Brussels, Belgium, E-mail: oscar_kallay@ 123456yahoo.fr . Alimuddin ZumlaFRCP, Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, Centre for Clinical Microbiology, University College London, London, United Kingdom, and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom, E-mail: a.zumla@ 123456ucl.ac.uk . Jean B Nachega, Center for Infectious Diseases, at Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa, Department of International Health and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, and University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health and Center for Global Health, Pittsburgh, PA, E-mail: jbn16@ 123456pitt.edu .

                Article
                tpmd200290
                10.4269/ajtmh.20-0290
                7253100
                32323646
                47b43cbf-0ef9-4cc9-bdaf-7976d322134d
                © The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 14 April 2020
                : 16 April 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 5
                Categories
                Perspective Piece

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content548

                Cited by57

                Most referenced authors2,443