7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Riesgos psicosociales en personal de salud del Perú: análisis de propiedades psicométricas del ISTAS 21 Translated title: Psychosocial risks in Peruvian health personnel: analysis of psychometric properties of ISTAS 21 questionnaire

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Objetivo: Analizar las propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario ISTAS 21 para valorar los riesgos psicosociales en personal de salud hospitalario y de servicios de atención primaria que suministran cuidados a pacientes Covid-19. Metodología: Diseño descriptivo, transversal, en el que se analiza las propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario ISTAS 21, para valorar los riesgos psicosociales en personal de salud. Resultados: Se evaluaron 231 profesionales (M=34.9, DE = 9.36 años), provenientes de hospitales y servicios de atención primaria. El análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC) evidencia pobre ajuste para el modelo de 5 factores de la estructura original (RMSEA = .120, CFI = .660, TLI = .597, y SRMR = .140), por lo que se evalúa la estructura con un AFE, que explica el 50% de la varianza y posee 5 factores, con adecuada consistencia interna. Conclusión: El ISTAS 21 cuenta con evidencia de validez y adecuada consistencia interna; y puede ser usado para identificar riesgos psicosociales en personal de salud peruanos que atienden pacientes Covid-19.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties of the ISTAS 21 questionnaire to assess psychosocial risks in hospital and primary health care personnel who provide care to Covid-19 patients. Methodology: the study has a descriptive, cross-sectional design, in which the psychometric properties of the ISTAS 21 questionnaire to assess psychosocial risks in health personnel were analyzed. Results: 231 professionals (M=34.9, SD=9.36 years) from hospitals and primary care services were evaluated. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evidences poor fit for the 5-factor model of the original structure (RMSEA = .120, CFI = .660, TLI = .597, and SRMR = .140), so the structure is evaluated with an AFE, which explains 50% of the variance and has 5 factors, with adequate internal consistency. Conclusions: It is concluded that the ISTAS 21 has evidence of validity and adequate internal consistency; and can be used to identify psychosocial risks in Peruvian health personnel who care for Covid-19 patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Welcome to the Tidyverse

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges

            Highlights • Emergence of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China has caused a large global outbreak and major public health issue. • At 9 February 2020, data from the WHO has shown >37 000 confirmed cases in 28 countries (>99% of cases detected in China). • 2019-nCoV is spread by human-to-human transmission via droplets or direct contact. • Infection estimated to have an incubation period of 2–14 days and a basic reproduction number of 2.24–3.58. • Controlling infection to prevent spread of the 2019-nCoV is the primary intervention being used.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychological status of medical workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study

              Highlights • The psychological state of medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. • The medical staff had greater psychological distress than the administrative staff. • The front line medical staff were twice more likely to suffer anxiety and depression. • Effective strategies toward to improving the mental health were important.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                index
                Index de Enfermería
                Index Enferm
                Fundación Index (Granada, Granada, Spain )
                1132-1296
                1699-5988
                June 2022
                : 31
                : 2
                : 115-119
                Affiliations
                [2] Arequipa Arequipa orgnameUniversidad Católica de Santa María orgdiv1Escuela Profesional de Psicología Peru
                [3] Lima Lima orgnameUniversidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos orgdiv1Facultad de Medicina Peru
                [1] Arequipa Arequipa orgnameUniversidad Católica de Santa María orgdiv1Escuela de Medicina Humana orgdiv2Vicerrectorado de Investigación Peru
                Article
                S1132-12962022000200014 S1132-1296(22)03100200014
                47db2bda-e979-428b-b451-3750dcd39b52

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 23 June 2021
                : 23 August 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 35, Pages: 5
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Instrumentos

                riesgos psicosociales,trabajadores de salud,Covid-19,Psychometric analysis,ISTAS 21,health workers,psychosocial risks,Análisis psicométrico

                Comments

                Comment on this article