6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions

      , , , ,
      The Journal of Academic Librarianship
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Utilizing and Adapting the Delphi Method for Use in Qualitative Research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis

              Predatory journals are spurious scientific outlets that charge fees for editorial and publishing services that they do not provide. Their lack of quality assurance of published articles increases the risk that unreliable research is published and thus jeopardizes the integrity and credibility of research as a whole. There is increasing awareness of the risks associated with predatory publishing, but efforts to address this situation are hampered by the lack of a clear definition of predatory outlets. Blacklists of predatory journals and whitelists of legitimate journals have been developed but not comprehensively examined. By systematically analyzing these lists, this study provides insights into their utility and delineates the different notions of quality and legitimacy in scholarly publishing used. This study contributes to a better understanding of the relevant concepts and provides a starting point for the development of a robust definition of predatory journals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                The Journal of Academic Librarianship
                The Journal of Academic Librarianship
                Elsevier BV
                00991333
                January 2023
                January 2023
                : 49
                : 1
                : 102659
                Article
                10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102659
                47ecaec3-2abc-4c26-af8d-7648afc4ba20
                © 2023

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-017

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-012

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029

                https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article