110
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effectiveness of interventions for reducing stigma related to substance use disorders: a systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          This study provides a systematic review of existing research that has empirically evaluated interventions designed to reduce stigma related to substance use disorders.

          Methods

          A comprehensive review of electronic databases was conducted to identify evaluations of substance use disorder related stigma interventions. Studies that met inclusion criteria were synthesized and assessed using systematic review methods.

          Results

          Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was moderately strong. Interventions of three studies (23%) focused on people with substance use disorders (self-stigma), three studies (23%) targeted the general public (social stigma) and seven studies (54%) focused on medical students and other professional groups (structural stigma). Nine interventions (69%) used approaches that included education and/or direct contact with people who have substance use disorders. All but one study indicated their interventions produced positive effects on at least one stigma outcome measure. None of the interventions have been evaluated across different settings or populations.

          Conclusions

          A range of interventions demonstrate promise for achieving meaningful improvements in stigma related to substance use disorders. The limited evidence indicates that self-stigma can be reduced through therapeutic interventions such as group-based acceptance and commitment therapy. Effective strategies for addressing social stigma include motivational interviewing and communicating positive stories of people with substance use disorders. For changing stigma at a structural level, contact-based training and education programs targeting medical students and professionals (e.g. police, counsellors) are effective.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An attribution model of public discrimination towards persons with mental illness.

          In this study, we build on previous work by developing and estimating a model of the relationships between causal attributions (e.g., controllability, responsibility), familiarity with mental illness, dangerousness, emotional responses (e.g., pity, anger, fear), and helping and rejecting responses. Using survey data containing responses to hypothetical vignettes, we examine these relationships in a sample of 518 community college students. Consistent with attribution theory, causal attributions affect beliefs about persons' responsibility for causing their condition, beliefs which in turn lead to affective reactions, resulting in rejecting responses such as avoidance, coercion, segregation, and withholding help. However, consistent with a danger appraisal hypothesis, the effects of perceptions of dangerousness on helping and rejecting responses are unmediated by responsibility beliefs. Much of the dangerousness effects operate by increasing fear, a particularly strong predictor of support for coercive treatment. The results from this study also suggest that familiarity with mental illness reduces discriminatory responses.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            On stigma and its consequences: evidence from a longitudinal study of men with dual diagnoses of mental illness and substance abuse.

            Numerous studies have demonstrated a strong connection between the experience of stigma and the well-being of the stigmatized. But in the area of mental illness there has been controversy surrounding the magnitude and duration of the effects of labeling and stigma. One of the arguments that has been used to downplay the importance of these factors is the substantial body of evidence suggesting that labeling leads to positive effects through mental health treatment. However, as Rosenfield (1997) points out, labeling can simultaneously induce both positive consequences through treatment and negative consequences through stigma. In this study we test whether stigma has enduring effects on well-being by interviewing 84 men with dual diagnoses of mental disorder and substance abuse at two points in time--at entry into treatment, when they were addicted to drugs and had many psychiatric symptoms and then again after a year of treatment, when they were far less symptomatic and largely drug- and alcohol-free. We found a relatively strong and enduring effect of stigma on well-being. This finding indicates that stigma continues to complicate the lives of the stigmatized even as treatment improves their symptoms and functioning. It follows that if health professionals want to maximize the well-being of the people they treat, they must address stigma as a separate and important factor in its own right.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stigma, discrimination and the health of illicit drug users.

              Persons who use illicit drugs are stigmatized in the United States. The conferral of a deviant social status on illicit drug users may serve to discourage use. However, stigmatization may also adversely affect the health of those who use illicit drugs, through exposure to chronic stress such as discrimination and as a barrier to accessing care. We hypothesized that aspects of stigma and discrimination would be associated with mental and physical health among illicit drug users. Using street outreach techniques, 1008 illicit drug users were interviewed about stigma and discrimination related to their drug use, and their health. We measured discrimination related to drug use, alienation, perceived devaluation, and responses to discrimination and stigma. Health measures included mental and physical health measures from the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, depression symptoms from the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale, and a sum of health conditions. In adjusted models, discrimination and alienation were both associated with poorer mental health, and only discrimination was associated with poorer physical health. Angry responses to discrimination and stigma were associated with poorer mental health. The association of stigma and discrimination with poor health among drug users suggests the need for debate on the relative risks and benefits of stigma and discrimination in this context.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Addiction
                add
                Addiction (Abingdon, England)
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                0965-2140
                1360-0443
                January 2012
                : 107
                : 1
                : 39-50
                Affiliations
                [1 ]simpleForensic Psychiatric Services Commission, BC Mental Health and Addiction Services Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada
                [2 ]simpleSimon Fraser University, School of Criminology Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
                [3 ]simpleSimon Fraser University, Faculty of Health Sciences Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: James D. Livingston, Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission, BC Mental Health and Addiction Services, 70 Colony Farm Road, Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada V3C 5X9. E-mail: jlivingston@ 123456forensic.bc.ca

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms

                Article
                10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03601.x
                3272222
                21815959
                482fa4c6-c0d3-411b-9e66-76d0f0bff773
                © 2011 The Authors, Addiction © 2011 Society for the Study of Addiction

                Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.

                History
                : 17 April 2011
                : 14 June 2011
                : 29 July 2011
                Categories
                Reviews

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                substance use disorders,intervention studies,systematic review,stigma

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log