4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Muscle Strength and Flexibility in Male Marathon Runners: The Role of Age, Running Speed and Anthropometry

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most studies on marathon runners have focused on physiological parameters determining performance, whereas neuromuscular aspects, such as muscle strength and flexibility, have received less attention. Thus, the aim of the present study was to examine the relationship of age, body composition, and running speed with muscle strength and flexibility of recreational marathon runners. Male marathon runners ( n = 130, age 44.1 ± 8.6 years, height 176 ± 6 cm, body mass 77 ± 9 body mass index 24.7 ± 2.6 kg.m –2, and race speed 10.29 ± 1.87 km/h) were separated into eight age groups (<30, 30–35, 55–60, >60 years). Four weeks before competing in a marathon, participants performed the sit-and-reach test (SAR), squat jumps (SJ), and countermovement jumps (CMJ), and four isometric muscle strength tests (right and left handgrip, lifting with knees extended and flexed), providing an index of overall isometric muscle strength in absolute (kg) relative to body mass values (kg.kg –1 body mass). Afterward, participants competed and finished the Athens Classic Marathon (2017), and race speed was used as an index of running performance. As an average for the whole sample, SAR was 17.6 ± 8.5 cm, SJ was 24.3 ± 4.2 cm, CMJ was 25.8 ± 4.8 cm, overall isometric muscle strength was 386 ± 59 kg in absolute values and 5.06 ± 0.78 kg/kg of body mass in relative terms. The older age groups had the lowest scores in SJ ( p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.298) and CMJ ( p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.304), whereas no age-related difference in SAR ( p = 0.908, η p 2 = 0.022), absolute ( p = 0.622, η p 2 = 0.042) and relative isometric muscle strength ( p = 0.435, η p 2 = 0.055) was shown. Race speed correlated moderately with relative isometric strength ( r = 0.42, p < 0.001), but not with the other neuromuscular measures ( r < 0.13, p > 0.130). In summary, age-related differences were shown in jumping ability, but not in flexibility and isometric muscle strength. Although these parameters - except relative strength - did not relate to running speed, they were components of health-related physical fitness. Consequently, coaches and runners should consider exercises that include stretching and strengthening in their weekly program to ensure adequate levels for all components of health-related physical fitness.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Lower extremity stiffness: implications for performance and injury

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Criterion-Related Validity of Sit-and-Reach Tests for Estimating Hamstring and Lumbar Extensibility: a Meta-Analysis.

            The main purpose of the present meta-analysis was to examine the scientific literature on the criterion-related validity of sit-and-reach tests for estimating hamstring and lumbar extensibility. For this purpose relevant studies were searched from seven electronic databases dated up through December 2012. Primary outcomes of criterion-related validity were Pearson´s zero-order correlation coefficients (r) between sit-and-reach tests and hamstrings and/or lumbar extensibility criterion measures. Then, from the included studies, the Hunter- Schmidt´s psychometric meta-analysis approach was conducted to estimate population criterion- related validity of sit-and-reach tests. Firstly, the corrected correlation mean (rp), unaffected by statistical artefacts (i.e., sampling error and measurement error), was calculated separately for each sit-and-reach test. Subsequently, the three potential moderator variables (sex of participants, age of participants, and level of hamstring extensibility) were examined by a partially hierarchical analysis. Of the 34 studies included in the present meta-analysis, 99 correlations values across eight sit-and-reach tests and 51 across seven sit-and-reach tests were retrieved for hamstring and lumbar extensibility, respectively. The overall results showed that all sit-and-reach tests had a moderate mean criterion-related validity for estimating hamstring extensibility (rp = 0.46-0.67), but they had a low mean for estimating lumbar extensibility (rp = 0. 16-0.35). Generally, females, adults and participants with high levels of hamstring extensibility tended to have greater mean values of criterion-related validity for estimating hamstring extensibility. When the use of angular tests is limited such as in a school setting or in large scale studies, scientists and practitioners could use the sit-and-reach tests as a useful alternative for hamstring extensibility estimation, but not for estimating lumbar extensibility. Key PointsOverall sit-and-reach tests have a moderate mean criterion-related validity for estimating hamstring extensibility, but they have a low mean validity for estimating lumbar extensibility.Among all the sit-and-reach test protocols, the Classic sit-and-reach test seems to be the best option to estimate hamstring extensibility.End scores (e.g., the Classic sit-and-reach test) are a better indicator of hamstring extensibility than the modifications that incorporate fingers-to-box distance (e.g., the Modified sit-and-reach test).When angular tests such as straight leg raise or knee extension tests cannot be used, sit-and-reach tests seem to be a useful field test alternative to estimate hamstring extensibility, but not to estimate lumbar extensibility.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluation of Four Vertical Jump Tests: Methodology, Reliability, Validity, and Accuracy

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Physiol
                Front Physiol
                Front. Physiol.
                Frontiers in Physiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-042X
                16 October 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 1301
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Exercise Physiology Laboratory , Nikaia, Greece
                [2] 2School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica , Athens, Greece
                [3] 3Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Camilo José Cela University , Madrid, Spain
                [4] 4Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [5] 5Medbase St. Gallen Am Vadianplatz , St. Gallen, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Henner Hanssen, University of Basel, Switzerland

                Reviewed by: Mark Pfeiffer, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany; Gennaro Boccia, University of Turin, Italy

                *Correspondence: Beat Knechtle, beat.knechtle@ 123456hispeed.ch

                This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology

                Article
                10.3389/fphys.2019.01301
                6805725
                31681011
                486f397a-bcc6-4d24-9ad9-54469d388016
                Copyright © 2019 Nikolaidis, Del Coso, Rosemann and Knechtle.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 02 July 2019
                : 27 September 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 40, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Categories
                Physiology
                Original Research

                Anatomy & Physiology
                aging,isometric muscle strength,race speed,range of motion,athlete
                Anatomy & Physiology
                aging, isometric muscle strength, race speed, range of motion, athlete

                Comments

                Comment on this article