15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pancreatic Islet-Autonomous Insulin and Smoothened-Mediated Signaling Modulate Identity Changes of Glucagon + α-Cells

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The mechanisms restricting regeneration and maintaining cell identity following injury are poorly characterized in higher vertebrates. Upon β-cell loss, 1–2% of the glucagon-producing α-cells spontaneously engage in insulin production in mice. Here we explore the mechanisms inhibiting α-cell plasticity. We show that the adaptive α-cell identity changes are constrained by intra-islet Insulin- and Smoothened-mediated signaling, among others. The combination of β-cell loss, or insulin signaling inhibition, with Smoothened inactivation in α- or δ-cells, stimulates insulin production in more α-cells. These findings suggest that removing constitutive “brake signals” is crucial for neutralizing the refractoriness to adaptive cell-fate changes. It appears that cell identity maintenance is an active process mediated by repressive signals, released by neighbor cells, curbing an intrinsic trend of differentiated cells to change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Pdx1 maintains β cell identity and function by repressing an α cell program.

          Pdx1 is a homeobox-containing transcription factor that plays a key role in pancreatic development and adult β cell function. In this study, we traced the fate of adult β cells after Pdx1 deletion. As expected, β-cell-specific removal of Pdx1 resulted in severe hyperglycemia within days. Surprisingly, a large fraction of Pdx1-deleted cells rapidly acquired ultrastructural and physiological features of α cells, indicating that a robust cellular reprogramming had occurred. Reprogrammed cells exhibited a global transcriptional shift that included derepression of the α cell transcription factor MafB, resulting in a transcriptional profile that closely resembled that of α cells. These findings indicate that Pdx1 acts as a master regulator of β cell fate by simultaneously activating genes essential for β cell identity and repressing those associated with α cell identity. We discuss the significance of these findings in the context of the emerging notion that loss of β cell identity contributes to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adaptive changes in pancreatic beta cell fractional area and beta cell turnover in human pregnancy

            Aims/hypothesis We sought to establish the extent and basis for adaptive changes in beta cell numbers in human pregnancy. Methods Pancreas was obtained at autopsy from women who had died while pregnant (n = 18), post-partum (n = 6) or were not pregnant at or shortly before death (controls; n = 20). Pancreases were evaluated for fractional pancreatic beta cell area, islet size and islet fraction of beta cells, beta cell replication (Ki67) and apoptosis (TUNEL), and indirect markers of beta cell neogenesis (insulin-positive cells in ducts and scattered beta cells in pancreas). Results The pancreatic fractional beta cell area was increased by ∼1.4-fold in human pregnancy, with no change in mean beta cell size. In pregnancy there were more small islets rather than an increase in islet size or beta cells per islet. No increase in beta cell replication or change in beta cell apoptosis was detected, but duct cells positive for insulin and scattered beta cells were increased with pregnancy. Conclusions/interpretation The adaptive increase in beta cell numbers in human pregnancy is not as great as in most reports in rodents. This increase in humans is achieved by increased numbers of beta cells in apparently new small islets, rather than duplication of beta cells in existing islets, which is characteristic of pregnancy in rodents. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1809-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diabetes Recovery By Age-Dependent Conversion of Pancreatic δ-Cells Into Insulin Producers

              Total or near-total loss of insulin-producing β-cells is a situation found in diabetes (Type 1, T1D) 1,2 . Restoration of insulin production in T1D is thus a major medical challenge. We previously observed in mice in which β-cells are completely ablated that the pancreas reconstitutes new insulin-producing cells in absence of autoimmunity 3 . The process involves the contribution of islet non-β-cells; specifically, glucagon-producing α-cells begin producing insulin by a process of reprogramming (transdifferentiation) without proliferation 3 . Here we studied the influence of age on β-cell reconstitution from heterologous islet cells after near-total β-cell loss. We found that senescence does not alter α-cell plasticity: α-cells can reprogram to produce insulin from puberty through adulthood, and also in aged individuals, even a long-time after β-cell loss. In contrast, prior to puberty there is no detectable α-cell conversion, although β-cell reconstitution after injury is more efficient, always leading to diabetes recovery; it occurs through a newly discovered mechanism: the spontaneous en masse reprogramming of somatostatin-producing δ-cells. The younglings display “somatostatin-to-insulin” δ-cell conversion, involving de-differentiation, proliferation and re-expression of islet developmental regulators. This juvenile adaptability relies, at least in part, upon combined action of FoxO1 and downstream effectors. Restoration of insulin producing-cells from non-β-cell origins is thus enabled throughout life via δ- or α-cell spontaneous reprogramming. A landscape with multiple intra-islet cell interconversion events is emerging, thus offering new perspectives.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                100890575
                21417
                Nat Cell Biol
                Nat. Cell Biol.
                Nature cell biology
                1465-7392
                1476-4679
                19 September 2018
                22 October 2018
                November 2018
                22 April 2019
                : 20
                : 11
                : 1267-1277
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Genetic Medicine & Development, iGE3 and Centre facultaire du diabète, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1 rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva-4, Switzerland
                [2 ]Present address: Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
                [3 ]Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Diabetes Research, University of Bergen, N-5020-1 Bergen, Norway
                [4 ]Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA
                [5 ]Department of Metabolism & Endocrinology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
                [6 ]Department of Metabolic Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
                [7 ]Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Center for Stem Cell Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
                [8 ]Department of Pediatrics and Cellular & Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego,9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0695
                [9 ]Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Program in Developmental Biology, and Center for Stem Cell Biology, 9415E MRBIV, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
                Author notes

                AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

                V.C., F.T., L.G., S.C., D.B. and K.F. performed all the experiments and most analyses. T.M., H.K, C.E.W. and M.S. provided transgenic lines. M.K.T., S.G., S.C., K.F. and L.V.G analyzed RNA-Seq data. M.A.M. and A.B.O. generated the Sst-rtTA knock-in mouse line. K.F., F.T., V.C., L.G., S.C., D.O. and P.L.H. conceived the experiments and wrote the manuscript.

                [* ]Correspondence should be addressed to pedro.herrera@ 123456unige.ch
                Article
                NIHMS1507071
                10.1038/s41556-018-0216-y
                6215453
                30361701
                48a240cc-9335-4714-9075-0c5368890e24

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article