10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      China’s science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research environment: A snapshot

      research-article
      1 , 2 , * , 2 , 3
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In keeping with China’s President Xi Jinping’s “Chinese Dream,” China has set a goal of becoming a world-class innovator by 2050. China’s higher education Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) research environment will play a pivotal role in influencing whether China is successful in transitioning from a manufacturing-based economy to an innovation-driven, knowledge-based economy. Past studies on China’s research environment have been primarily qualitative in nature or based on anecdotal evidence. In this study, we surveyed STEM faculty from China’s top 25 universities to get a clearer understanding of how faculty members view China’s overall research environment. We received 731 completed survey responses, 17% of which were from individuals who received terminal degrees from abroad and 83% of which were from individuals who received terminal degrees from domestic institutions of higher education. We present results on why returnees decided to study abroad, returnees’ decisions to return to China, and differences in perceptions between returnees and domestic degree holders on the advantages of having a foreign degree. The top five challenges to China’s research environment identified by survey respondents were: a promotion of short-term thinking and instant success (37% of all respondents); research funding (33%); too much bureaucratic or governmental intervention (31%); the evaluation system (27%); and a reliance on human relations (26%). Results indicated that while China has clearly made strides in its higher education system, there are numerous challenges that must be overcome before China can hope to effectively produce the kinds of innovative thinkers that are required if it is to achieve its ambitious goals. We also raise questions about the current direction of education and inquiry in China, particularly indications that government policy is turning inward, away from openness that is central to innovative thinking.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys

          R. Groves (2006)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            GUANXI: CONNECTIONS AS SUBSTITUTES FOR FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              On the Intricacies of the Chinese Guanxi: A Process Model of Guanxi Development

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                3 April 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 4
                : e0195347
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Science and Technology Policy Institute, Washington DC, United States of America
                [2 ] Center for Nanotechnology in Society, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America
                [3 ] Department of Global Studies, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States of America
                Iowa State University, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4643-2880
                Article
                PONE-D-17-41885
                10.1371/journal.pone.0195347
                5882148
                29614123
                48aa3273-7539-435a-ba47-04baf1f8e158
                © 2018 Han, Appelbaum

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 28 November 2017
                : 20 March 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001, National Science Foundation;
                Award ID: SES 0938099
                Award Recipient :
                This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation ( www.nsf.gov) under Grant No. SES 0938099 awarded to the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at the University of California, Santa Barbara (CNS-UCSB) to RPA. NSF and CNS-UCSB had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Science Policy
                Research Funding
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                Surveys
                People and Places
                Geographical Locations
                Asia
                China
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Education
                Schools
                Universities
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Educational Status
                Graduates
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                Science Policy
                Research Integrity
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Custom metadata
                Original survey data, free response answers in both Chinese and English translation, and coding of free response answers are publically available at Figshare: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5619316.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article