7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Don't characterize replications as successes or failures.

      1
      The Behavioral and brain sciences
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          No replication is truly direct, and I recommend moving away from the classification of replications as "direct" or "conceptual" to a framework in which we accept that treatment effects vary across conditions. Relatedly, we should stop labeling replications as successes or failures and instead use continuous measures to compare different studies, again using meta-analysis of raw data where possible.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Behav Brain Sci
          The Behavioral and brain sciences
          Cambridge University Press (CUP)
          1469-1825
          0140-525X
          January 2018
          : 41
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Statistics,Columbia University,New York,NY 10027.gelman@stat.columbia.eduhttp://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman.
          Article
          S0140525X18000638
          10.1017/S0140525X18000638
          31064510
          4931048f-34e1-450b-a6a2-03d0931294ba
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article