18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health research participants are not receiving research results: a collaborative solution is needed

      letter
      1 , , 2 , 3
      Trials
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Health research participants want the results of the studies in which they participate but do not typically receive them. Researchers generally express support for sharing results with participants but, in practice, may be unprepared or unwilling to do so. Many funders call for increased dissemination of research results beyond academic and clinical audiences, but few funders sponsor research to improve result sharing with participants. Although the solution appears straightforward (e.g., funders could incentivize researchers to share results with participants), there are critical gaps in knowledge that suggest the need for a more deliberate approach. For example, what ethical or practical concerns discourage researchers from returning results to participants? What exactly do participants plan to do with the results that they would like to receive? What are the best channels of communication for sharing results with particular participant populations? To address these knowledge gaps, we argue for a collaborative process to develop a research agenda related to result sharing with participants. With support and encouragement by funders, such research should evaluate the effects of different types of results (and results from different types of studies) on participants’ behaviors, attitudes, and emotions; it should also examine the researchers’ ethical, financial, logistical, methodological, and skill-related concerns and constraints related to sharing results with participants. Over time, collaborative research between researchers and participants can yield an evolving set of evidence-based guidelines for ethical, effective result sharing with participants.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Communicating the Results of Clinical Research to Participants: Attitudes, Practices, and Future Directions

          The authors discuss the available data on the effects of communicating aggregate and individual research results on participants, investigators, and the research enterprise.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research.

            Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has been promoted as an approach to understanding complex health problems not amenable to research conducted solely by outside investigators. Although broad dissemination of research results is a key element of the CBPR approach, existing dissemination efforts have not been assessed. In this systematic review, researchers evaluated studies utilizing the CBPR approach to characterize dissemination of research results beyond scientific publication. Specifically, the focus was on dissemination to community participants and the general public. The literature search encompassed articles published between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009. Corresponding authors were also invited to complete a web-based survey. Data were collected and analyzed between July 1, 2008, and March 8, 2010. In all, 101 articles met inclusion criteria. All articles were assessed for the quality of community involvement in research. Scores ranged from 1.4 to 3.0 (on a 3-point scale), with a mean of 2.3. The 21 articles in which an intervention was evaluated were scored for the rigor of research methods. Scores ranged from 2.0 to 2.9 (on a 3-point scale), with a mean of 2.4. Dissemination beyond scientific publication was reported in 48% of publications with varying levels of detail. However, among survey respondents, 98% reported dissemination of results to community participants and 84% reported dissemination to the general public. Among research meeting strict criteria for inclusion as CBPR, dissemination beyond scientific publication is largely occurring. However, myriad challenges to timely and widespread dissemination remain, and current dissemination to community participants and the general public is variable. Copyright © 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination.

              The study identifies the experiences, preferences, and perceptions of research participants regarding dissemination of research findings at the participant level and community level.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                crlong2@uams.edu
                StewartMaryK@uams.edu
                pamcelfish@uams.edu
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                2 October 2017
                2 October 2017
                2017
                : 18
                : 449
                Affiliations
                [1 ]College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Division of Health Services Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, AR USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4687 1637, GRID grid.241054.6, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, , University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, ; Little Rock, AR USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2151 0999, GRID grid.411017.2, College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, , University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, ; Fayetteville, AR USA
                Article
                2200
                10.1186/s13063-017-2200-4
                5625845
                28969665
                49382611-ada2-4072-be34-25256336f6b1
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 25 April 2017
                : 17 September 2017
                Categories
                Commentary
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article